• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Entanglements of Technologies, Agency and Selfhood: Exploring the Complexity in Attitudes Toward Mental Health Chatbots.技术、能动性和自我认同的纠葛:探索对心理健康聊天机器人态度的复杂性。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;48(4):840-857. doi: 10.1007/s11013-024-09876-2. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
2
An Overview of Chatbot-Based Mobile Mental Health Apps: Insights From App Description and User Reviews.基于聊天机器人的移动心理健康应用概述:来自应用描述和用户评论的见解。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 May 22;11:e44838. doi: 10.2196/44838.
3
The Potential of Chatbots for Emotional Support and Promoting Mental Well-Being in Different Cultures: Mixed Methods Study.聊天机器人在不同文化中提供情感支持和促进心理健康的潜力:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 20;25:e51712. doi: 10.2196/51712.
4
Evaluation of the Current State of Chatbots for Digital Health: Scoping Review.评估数字健康领域的聊天机器人现状:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 19;25:e47217. doi: 10.2196/47217.
5
A Suite of Mobile Conversational Agents for Daily Stress Management (Popbots): Mixed Methods Exploratory Study.一套用于日常压力管理的移动对话代理(Popbots):混合方法探索性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 14;5(9):e25294. doi: 10.2196/25294.
6
Chatbots That Deliver Contraceptive Support: Systematic Review.提供避孕支持的聊天机器人:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 27;26:e46758. doi: 10.2196/46758.
7
A Mental Health and Well-Being Chatbot: User Event Log Analysis.心理健康与幸福感聊天机器人:用户事件日志分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jul 6;11:e43052. doi: 10.2196/43052.
8
Chatbots to Support Mental Wellbeing of People Living in Rural Areas: Can User Groups Contribute to Co-design?支持农村地区居民心理健康的聊天机器人:用户群体能否为协同设计做出贡献?
J Technol Behav Sci. 2021;6(4):652-665. doi: 10.1007/s41347-021-00222-6. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Validity of Chatbot Use for Mental Health Assessment: Experimental Study.用于心理健康评估的聊天机器人的有效性:实验研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Oct 31;10(10):e28082. doi: 10.2196/28082.
10
Effective provider communication for personal agency in mental health recovery: A cross-sectional study on Japanese users' perspectives.有效沟通助力精神健康康复:基于日本用户视角的横断面研究
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Dec;31(6):1164-1174. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13078. Epub 2024 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporalities of peer support: the role of digital platforms in the 'living presents' of mental ill-health.同伴支持的时间性:数字平台在心理健康“当下呈现”中的作用。
Health Sociol Rev. 2024 Mar;33(1):59-72. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2024.2322531. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
2
Beyond the hype: 'acceptable futures' for AI and robotic technologies in healthcare.超越炒作:人工智能和机器人技术在医疗保健领域的“可接受的未来”
AI Soc. 2023 Apr 22;39(4):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00146-023-01659-4.
3
User Experiences of Well-Being Chatbots.用户对健康聊天机器人的体验。
Hum Factors. 2024 Jun;66(6):1703-1723. doi: 10.1177/00187208231162453. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
4
Perceptions and Opinions of Patients About Mental Health Chatbots: Scoping Review.患者对心理健康聊天机器人的看法和意见:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 13;23(1):e17828. doi: 10.2196/17828.
5
Conversational agents and the making of mental health recovery.对话代理与心理健康康复的实现。
Digit Health. 2020 Nov 20;6:2055207620966170. doi: 10.1177/2055207620966170. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
6
Can digital data diagnose mental health problems? A sociological exploration of 'digital phenotyping'.数字数据能否诊断心理健康问题?“数字表型”的社会学探索。
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Nov;42(8):1873-1887. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13175. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用聊天机器人改善心理健康的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 13;22(7):e16021. doi: 10.2196/16021.
8
Using Psychological Artificial Intelligence (Tess) to Relieve Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial.使用心理人工智能(苔丝)缓解抑郁和焦虑症状:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Dec 13;5(4):e64. doi: 10.2196/mental.9782.
9
Digitising psychiatry? Sociotechnical expectations, performative nominalism and biomedical virtue in (digital) psychiatric praxis.数字化精神病学?(数字)精神病学实践中的社会技术期望、表现性唯名论和生物医学美德。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Oct;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12811. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
10
Recovery stories: An anthropological exploration of moral agency in stories of mental health recovery.康复故事:对心理健康康复故事中道德能动性的人类学探索
Transcult Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;53(4):427-44. doi: 10.1177/1363461516663124.

技术、能动性和自我认同的纠葛:探索对心理健康聊天机器人态度的复杂性。

Entanglements of Technologies, Agency and Selfhood: Exploring the Complexity in Attitudes Toward Mental Health Chatbots.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.

出版信息

Cult Med Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;48(4):840-857. doi: 10.1007/s11013-024-09876-2. Epub 2024 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11013-024-09876-2
PMID:39153178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11570556/
Abstract

Whilst chatbots for mental health are becoming increasingly prevalent, research on user experiences and expectations is relatively scarce and also equivocal on their acceptability and utility. This paper asks how people formulate their understandings of what might be appropriate in this space. We draw on data from a group of non-users who have experienced a need for support, and so can imagine self as therapeutic target-enabling us to tap into their imaginative speculations of the self in relation to the chatbot other and the forms of agency they see as being at play; unconstrained by a specific actual chatbot. Analysis points towards ambiguity over some key issues: whether the apps were seen as having a role in specific episodes of mental health or in relation to an ongoing project of supporting wellbeing; whether the chatbot could be viewed as having a therapeutic agency or was a mere tool; and how far these issues related to matters of the user's personal qualities or the specific nature of the mental health condition. A range of traditions, norms and practices were used to construct diverse expectations on whether chatbots could offer a solution to cost-effective mental health support at scale.

摘要

虽然用于心理健康的聊天机器人越来越普及,但关于用户体验和期望的研究相对较少,并且对于它们的可接受性和实用性也存在争议。本文探讨了人们如何理解在这个领域中什么是合适的。我们借鉴了一组没有使用过聊天机器人但有过支持需求的非用户的数据,这些人可以想象自己是治疗目标,使我们能够挖掘他们对自我与聊天机器人对方以及他们认为正在发挥作用的代理形式的想象推测;不受特定实际聊天机器人的限制。分析指出,一些关键问题存在歧义:应用程序是否被视为在特定的心理健康事件中发挥作用,还是在支持幸福感的持续项目中发挥作用;聊天机器人是否可以被视为具有治疗作用,还是仅仅是一种工具;以及这些问题在多大程度上与用户的个人素质或心理健康状况的特定性质有关。一系列传统、规范和实践被用来构建关于聊天机器人是否可以提供一种解决方案来实现具有成本效益的大规模心理健康支持的不同期望。