Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 17;9(1):e001531. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001531.
The calliper function is used for manual measurements of full thickness macular holes (FTMHs). We aimed to investigate whether a reproducible difference could be detected beyond interobserver variability between two commonly used manufacturers in their manual calliper facility in spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) for metrics related to FTMH.
This is a non-interventional, retrospective, observational study. Two independent observers examined 8 eyes (16 OCT) scans and 128 measurements (minimal linear diameter (MLD), basal diameter and hole height on both sides) of FTMHs, taken on Heidelberg Spectralis and Topcon Triton (OCT machines). The interobserver agreement and OCT machine agreement of measurements were analysed by Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Spectralis and Triton had 125 µm and 50 µm horizontal b-scan spacing, respectively.
Overall, we report high absolute agreement in interobserver (ICC 0.991 (95% CI 0.985 to 0.995, p<0.001)) and OCT machine (ICC 0.993 (95% CI 0.987 to 0.996, p<0.001)) variability. Lower horizontal resolution in Triton compared with Spectralis leads to interobserver variability, in smaller horizontal measurements. Lower horizontal scanning density in Spectralis lead to relatively large interobserver variation if different reference scans were chosen, and consistently smaller MLD measurements than Triton. Vertical measurements without 1:1 scaling lead to inaccurate exaggerated oblique vertical measurements. Calliper function appears otherwise identically calibrated.
We report excellent interobserver and OCT machine agreement in measurements. However, the paper shows several factors that could influence the reliability of measurements acquired in eyes with FTMHs, such as the dimension of the hole as well as different image resolution, density scanning protocols or vertical scaling of the OCT machines viewing platform.
卡尺功能用于全层黄斑裂孔(FTMH)的手动测量。我们旨在研究在光谱域光相干断层扫描(OCT)中,两种常用制造商的手动卡尺设备之间是否可以检测到超出观察者间变异性的重复性差异,用于与 FTMH 相关的指标。
这是一项非介入性、回顾性、观察性研究。两名独立观察者检查了 8 只眼(16 次 OCT)扫描和 128 次 FTMH 的测量(最小线性直径(MLD)、基底直径和两侧孔高),分别使用海德堡 Spectralis 和 Topcon Triton(OCT 机器)进行测量。通过 Bland-Altman 图和组内相关系数(ICC)分析评估观察者间和 OCT 机器间测量的一致性。Spectralis 和 Triton 的水平 B 扫描间距分别为 125μm 和 50μm。
总体而言,我们报告了观察者间(ICC 0.991(95%CI 0.985 至 0.995,p<0.001))和 OCT 机器(ICC 0.993(95%CI 0.987 至 0.996,p<0.001))变异性的高度一致性。与 Spectralis 相比,Triton 的水平分辨率较低,导致水平测量值较小的观察者间变异性。Spectralis 的水平扫描密度较低,如果选择不同的参考扫描,则导致观察者间变异性较大,并且 MLD 测量值始终比 Triton 小。没有 1:1 缩放的垂直测量会导致不准确的夸大的斜向垂直测量。卡尺功能似乎具有相同的校准精度。
我们报告了测量值的出色观察者间和 OCT 机器间一致性。然而,本文展示了几个可能影响 FTMH 眼中测量可靠性的因素,例如孔的尺寸以及不同的图像分辨率、密度扫描协议或 OCT 机器观察平台的垂直缩放。