Biotechnology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.
Nutr Diabetes. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s41387-024-00320-3.
The probiotic potential of Lacticacid bacteria has been studied in various medical complications, from gastrointestinal diseases to antibiotic resistance infections recently. Moreover, diabetic ulcer (DU) is known as one of the most significant global healthcare concerns, which comprehensively impacts the quality of life for these patients. Given that the conventional treatments of DUs have failed to prevent later complications completely, developing alternative therapies seems to be crucial.
We designed the stable oleogel-based formulation of viable probiotic cells, including Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus), Lactobacillus casei (L. casei), Lactobacillus fermentum (L. fermentum), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) individually to investigate their effect on wound healing process as an in vivo study. The wound repair process was closely monitored regarding morphology, biochemical, and histopathological changes over two weeks and compared it with the effects of topical tetracycline as an antibiotic approach. Furthermore, the antibiofilm activity of probiotic bacteria was assessed against some common pathogens.
The findings indicated that all tested lactobacillus groups (excluded L. casei) included in the oleogel-based formulation revealed a high potential for repairing damaged skin due to the considerably more levels of hydroxyproline content of tissue samples along with the higher numerical density of mature fibroblasts cell and volume density of hair follicles, collagen fibrils, and neovascularization in comparison with antibiotic and control groups. L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus showed the best potential of wound healing among all lactobacillus species, groups treated by tetracycline and control groups. Besides, L. rhamnosus showed a significant biofilm inhibition activity against tested pathogens.
This experiment demonstrated that the designed formulations containing probiotics, particularly L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus, play a central role in manipulating diabetic wound healing. It could be suggested as an encouraging nominee for diabetic wound-healing alternative approaches, though further studies in detailed clinical trials are needed.
最近,益生菌在各种医学并发症中的潜力已被研究,从胃肠道疾病到抗生素耐药性感染。此外,糖尿病溃疡(DU)是全球医疗保健关注的最重要问题之一,它严重影响了这些患者的生活质量。鉴于传统的 DU 治疗方法未能完全预防后期并发症,开发替代疗法似乎至关重要。
我们设计了稳定的基于油凝胶的活菌益生菌细胞制剂,包括鼠李糖乳杆菌(L. rhamnosus)、干酪乳杆菌(L. casei)、发酵乳杆菌(L. fermentum)和嗜酸乳杆菌(L. acidophilus),分别研究它们作为体内研究对伤口愈合过程的影响。在两周内密切监测伤口修复过程中的形态、生化和组织病理学变化,并将其与局部四环素(一种抗生素方法)的效果进行比较。此外,还评估了益生菌对一些常见病原体的抗生物膜活性。
研究结果表明,油凝胶制剂中包含的所有测试乳杆菌组(不包括 L. casei)由于组织样本中羟脯氨酸含量显著增加,以及成熟成纤维细胞数量密度、毛囊体积密度、胶原纤维和新生血管化等方面,都显示出修复受损皮肤的巨大潜力,与抗生素和对照组相比。与所有乳杆菌属相比,L. acidophilus 和 L. rhamnosus 在治疗组、四环素治疗组和对照组中表现出最好的伤口愈合潜力。此外,L. rhamnosus 对测试病原体显示出显著的生物膜抑制活性。
该实验表明,设计的含有益生菌的制剂,特别是 L. acidophilus 和 L. rhamnosus,在操纵糖尿病伤口愈合方面发挥着核心作用。它可以被推荐为糖尿病伤口愈合替代方法的有希望的候选者,尽管需要进一步的详细临床试验研究。