• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RPVBT联合化疗治疗单发、<3 cm、T2期膀胱癌患者的短期疗效

Short-term Outcome of RPVBT Combined with Chemotherapy for Patients with Single, < 3 cm, T2 Stage Bladder cancer.

作者信息

Zhang Zhihua, Wang Yashen, Luo Fei, Li Jian

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, No. 190 Jie-yuan Road, Hong-qiao District, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Biol Proced Online. 2024 Aug 20;26(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12575-024-00253-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12575-024-00253-2
PMID:39164627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11334510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the survival outcome of "radical" GreenLight photoselective vaporization of bladder tumor (RPVBT) in conjunction with postoperative chemotherapy for patients with single, < 3 cm in diameter, T2 stage muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with single, < 3 cm, T2 stage bladder cancer were treated with RPVBT combined with chemotherapy and were included in the RPVBT group. To compare the differences in survival outcome, 80 patients with Ta/T1 bladder cancer and 30 patients with T2 bladder cancer were included as controls. The 80 patients with Ta/T1 bladder cancer underwent GreenLight photoselective vaporization of bladder tumors(PVBT), while 30 patients with T2 bladder cancer underwent radical cystectomy (RC) combined with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Tumor recurrence and death were recorded, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were plotted to compare the survival difference between the RPVBT and control groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in comorbidities or living habits between the RPVBT and control groups. Blood loss [RPVBT: 20 (IQR10, 20) vs. RC: 100 (IQR90, 150) mL] and postoperative hospital stay [RPVBT: 5.5 (IQR5, 6), vs. RC: 10 (IQR8, 12) days] in the RPVBT group were significantly lower than that in the RC group. Urinary tract infection [RPVBT: 6 (15.8%) vs. PVBT: 14 (17.5%)] and bladder irritation sign [RPVBT: 11 (28.9%) vs. PVBT: 23 (28.8%) ] were the most common short-term complications in the RPVBT group, with no statistical difference between the RPVBT and PVBT group. The median follow-up time for survival endpoints was 22 (16, 27) months for the included patients after surgery. The outcomes of tumor recurrence at 12, 24, and 36 months were 2 (5.3%), 3 (7.9%), and 5 (13.2%) patients in the RPVBT groups, 13 (16.3%) and 3 (10%) patients experienced recurrence in the PVBT and RC groups at 36 months. No significant differences were noted among the three groups (P = 0.778). Additionally, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in RFS (P = 0.791) and OS (P = 0.689) among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that RPVBT combined with chemotherapy is a simple and feasible treatment option with fewer complications and satisfactory survival outcomes in patients with single, < 3 cm, T2 stage bladder cancer.

摘要

背景

探讨“根治性”绿激光选择性汽化膀胱肿瘤(RPVBT)联合术后化疗对直径<3 cm的单发T2期肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者的生存结局。

方法

38例直径<3 cm的单发T2期膀胱癌患者接受RPVBT联合化疗,纳入RPVBT组。为比较生存结局的差异,纳入80例Ta/T1期膀胱癌患者和30例T2期膀胱癌患者作为对照组。80例Ta/T1期膀胱癌患者接受绿激光选择性汽化膀胱肿瘤(PVBT),30例T2期膀胱癌患者接受根治性膀胱切除术(RC)联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)。记录肿瘤复发和死亡情况,绘制无复发生存(RFS)和总生存(OS)曲线,比较RPVBT组与对照组的生存差异。

结果

RPVBT组与对照组在合并症或生活习惯方面未观察到显著差异。RPVBT组的失血量[RPVBT:20(IQR10,20)ml vs. RC:100(IQR90,150)ml]和术后住院时间[RPVBT:5.5(IQR5,6)天,vs. RC:10(IQR8,12)天]显著低于RC组。尿路感染[RPVBT:6例(占15.8%)vs. PVBT:14例(占17.5%)]和膀胱刺激征[RPVBT:11例(占28.9%)vs. PVBT:23例(占28.8%)]是RPVBT组最常见的短期并发症,RPVBT组与PVBT组之间无统计学差异。术后纳入患者生存终点的中位随访时间为22(16,27)个月。RPVBT组在12、24和36个月时的肿瘤复发情况分别为2例(占5.3%)、3例(占7.9%)和5例(占13.2%),PVBT组和RC组在36个月时分别有13例(占16.3%)和3例(占10%)患者复发。三组之间未观察到显著差异(P = 0.778)。此外,Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,三组在RFS(P = 0.791)和OS(P = 0.689)方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,RPVBT联合化疗是一种简单可行的治疗选择,对于直径<3 cm的单发T2期膀胱癌患者,并发症较少,生存结局令人满意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/eb3095114fb3/12575_2024_253_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/1238d37f2bc1/12575_2024_253_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/35fb7ea18070/12575_2024_253_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/90d3135b8383/12575_2024_253_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/112cdefa7a80/12575_2024_253_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/eb3095114fb3/12575_2024_253_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/1238d37f2bc1/12575_2024_253_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/35fb7ea18070/12575_2024_253_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/90d3135b8383/12575_2024_253_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/112cdefa7a80/12575_2024_253_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94d/11334510/eb3095114fb3/12575_2024_253_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term Outcome of RPVBT Combined with Chemotherapy for Patients with Single, < 3 cm, T2 Stage Bladder cancer.RPVBT联合化疗治疗单发、<3 cm、T2期膀胱癌患者的短期疗效
Biol Proced Online. 2024 Aug 20;26(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12575-024-00253-2.
2
Prognostic Value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with GreenLight Laser Vaporization.绿光激光汽化术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌中中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的预后价值
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019 May;37(5):312-317. doi: 10.1089/photob.2018.4592. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
Genomic Differences Between "Primary" and "Secondary" Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer as a Basis for Disparate Outcomes to Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.原发性和继发性肌层浸润性膀胱癌之间的基因组差异是基于顺铂为基础的新辅助化疗疗效差异的基础。
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
4
Extended versus standard lymph node dissection for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术患者行扩大淋巴结清扫与标准淋巴结清扫治疗膀胱尿路上皮癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD013336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013336.
5
Comparative Outcomes of Primary Versus Recurrent High-risk Non-muscle-invasive and Primary Versus Secondary Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Study.根治性膀胱切除术后原发性与复发性高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌以及原发性与继发性肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较结果:一项回顾性多中心研究的结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Apr 1;39:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.011. eCollection 2022 May.
6
The efficacy and safety of simultaneous transurethral GreenLight photoselective vaporization of bladder tumor and prostate in patients with bladder tumor and lower urinary tract symptoms.膀胱肿瘤合并下尿路症状患者同期经尿道绿激光膀胱肿瘤与前列腺光选择性汽化术的疗效与安全性
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Apr;46(4):691-4. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0572-2. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
7
Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of SPARE - a randomised feasibility study of selective bladder preservation versus radical cystectomy.SPARE的临床及患者报告结局——一项关于选择性膀胱保留术与根治性膀胱切除术的随机可行性研究
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):639-650. doi: 10.1111/bju.13900. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Selective bladder-sparing protocol consisting of induction low-dose chemoradiotherapy plus partial cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection against muscle-invasive bladder cancer: oncological outcomes of the initial 46 patients.选择保留膀胱方案,包括诱导低剂量放化疗联合根治性膀胱切除术加盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌:46 例初始患者的肿瘤学结局。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):860-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10425.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
9
The effect of the time interval between diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and radical cystectomy on staging and survival: A Netherlands Cancer Registry analysis.肌层浸润性膀胱癌诊断与根治性膀胱切除术之间的时间间隔对分期和生存的影响:一项荷兰癌症登记处分析。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Apr;34(4):166.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by immediate cystectomy may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with clinical T2 bladder cancer.新辅助吉西他滨和顺铂治疗后立即行膀胱切除术可能对临床T2期膀胱癌患者的生存有益。
Med Oncol. 2014 May;31(5):949. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0949-9. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications and future prospects of laser technologies in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.激光技术在非肌层浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的应用及未来前景
Bladder (San Franc). 2025 Jun 5;12(3):e21200050. doi: 10.14440/bladder.2025.0004. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-institutional propensity score matched and weighted analysis.根治性膀胱切除术与三联疗法治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌:多机构倾向评分匹配和加权分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jun;24(6):669-681. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00170-5. Epub 2023 May 12.
2
Systematic review of the association between socioeconomic status and bladder cancer survival with hospital type, comorbidities, and treatment delay as mediators.以医院类型、合并症和治疗延迟为中介因素,对社会经济地位与膀胱癌生存率之间关联的系统评价。
BJUI Compass. 2021 Jan 7;2(3):140-158. doi: 10.1002/bco2.65. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Organ-Sparing Strategies in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的器官保留策略
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Oct 13;13:7833-7839. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S294099. eCollection 2021.
4
Standard Versus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Bladder Cancer: New Insights, but Questions Remain.膀胱癌的标准放疗与大分割放疗:新见解,但问题犹存。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Sep 1;111(1):113-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.048.
5
Trimodality Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Institutional Experience.肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的三联疗法:一项机构经验
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 May 20;6(5):100718. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100718. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
6
Green-light laser en bloc resection versus conventional transurethral resection for initial non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A randomized controlled trial.绿光激光整块切除术与传统经尿道切除术治疗初发非肌层浸润性膀胱癌:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Urol. 2021 Aug;28(8):855-860. doi: 10.1111/iju.14592. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
Hypofractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis of the BC2001 and BCON trials.局部晚期膀胱癌的分割放疗:BC2001 和 BCON 试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):246-255. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30607-0.
8
Radical cystectomy: a review of techniques, developments and controversies.根治性膀胱切除术:技术、进展与争议综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):3073-3081. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.23.
9
Trimodal therapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer management.肌层浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的三联疗法。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Dec;72(6):650-662. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04018-7.
10
Predicting morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy using risk calculators: A comprehensive review of the literature.使用风险计算器预测根治性膀胱切除术的发病率和死亡率:文献综述。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Feb;39(2):109-120. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.032. Epub 2020 Nov 19.