• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Religion, personality, or none of them? Exploratory evidence on their correlations with economic preference parameters.宗教、性格,还是两者皆无?关于它们与经济偏好参数相关性的探索性证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1361910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361910. eCollection 2024.
2
Preferences, personality and health behaviors: results from an explorative economic experiment.偏好、个性与健康行为:一项探索性经济实验的结果
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Dec;18(4):437-456. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9236-1. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
3
Loss Aversion and Health Behaviors: Results from Two Incentivized Economic Experiments.损失厌恶与健康行为:两项激励性经济实验的结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;9(8):1040. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081040.
4
Five-Factor Model Personality Traits and Self-Classified Religiousness and Spirituality.五因素模型人格特质与自我分类的宗教信仰和精神性。
J Relig Health. 2020 Jun;59(3):1344-1369. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00847-1.
5
Determinants of Lifestyle Choices Among South Korean College Students: An Experimental Analysis.韩国大学生生活方式选择的决定因素:一项实验分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Jan 20;15:93-105. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S333968. eCollection 2022.
6
A religious upbringing reduces the influence of genetic factors on disinhibition: evidence for interaction between genotype and environment on personality.宗教教养会降低遗传因素对行为抑制缺乏的影响:关于基因型与环境在人格方面相互作用的证据。
Twin Res. 1999 Jun;2(2):115-25. doi: 10.1375/136905299320565988.
7
An Economic Perspective on Personality Traits and Alcohol Misuse: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.人格特质与酒精滥用的经济学视角:来自健康与退休研究的证据。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Jun;18(2):75-92.
8
Understanding biological and social influences on religious affiliation, attitudes, and behaviors: a behavior genetic perspective.从行为遗传学视角理解生物和社会因素对宗教归属、态度及行为的影响
J Pers. 1999 Dec;67(6):953-84. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00079.
9
RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success-But do they already matter for educational track choices?职业兴趣 RIASEC 与大五人格特质对生活成功很重要——但它们对教育轨道的选择是否已经很重要?
J Pers. 2020 Oct;88(5):1007-1024. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12547. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
10
Spiritual but not religious? Evidence for two independent dispositions.有灵性但无宗教信仰?两种独立倾向的证据。
J Pers. 2006 Oct;74(5):1257-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00409.x.

本文引用的文献

1
The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.JASP 进行和报告贝叶斯分析的指南。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):813-826. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5.
2
RELIGIOUS IDENTITY AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR.宗教身份与经济行为。
Rev Econ Stat. 2016 Oct;98(4):617-637. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00586. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
An introduction to using Bayesian linear regression with clinical data.贝叶斯线性回归在临床数据中的应用简介。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Nov;98:58-75. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
4
Education and Lifetime Earnings in the United States.美国的教育与终身收入
Demography. 2015 Aug;52(4):1383-407. doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0407-0.
5
Impact of personal economic environment and personality factors on individual financial decision making.个人经济环境和人格因素对个人财务决策的影响。
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 4;5:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00158. eCollection 2014.
6
Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting.天堂可待。宗教如何调节时间贴现。
Psychol Res. 2013 Nov;77(6):738-47. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0473-5. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
7
Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference.用风险偏好的实验性测量来预测健康行为。
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1260-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jun 7.
8
The structure of phenotypic personality traits.表型人格特质的结构。
Am Psychol. 1993 Jan;48(1):26-34. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.48.1.26.
9
Patterns of American Jewish fertility.美国犹太人生育模式。
Demography. 1980 Aug;17(3):261-73.

宗教、性格,还是两者皆无?关于它们与经济偏好参数相关性的探索性证据。

Religion, personality, or none of them? Exploratory evidence on their correlations with economic preference parameters.

作者信息

Bessey Donata

机构信息

EastAsia International College, Yonsei University, Mirae Campus, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1361910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361910. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361910
PMID:39171237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11338016/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous empirical research in the social sciences suggests sizable differences across religious denominations for various outcomes of interest, such as educational attainment, marital stability, wealth, or fertility. A small body of previous experimental literature has investigated possible differences in economic preference parameters (including time preference and risk attitude) between religious denominations that might explain those differences.

METHODS

This research adds to the extant literature on religion and preferences by including information on subjects' Big Five personality traits and analyzing potential correlations with loss aversion. It combines experimental data from incentivized choices with information on religious affiliation during high school and Big Five personality traits to test for possible correlations of religious denomination with risk attitude, time preference, and loss aversion, using Bayesian analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bayesian regression analysis.

RESULTS

Bayesian ANOVA results suggest no preference differences between the religions analyzed in this research. When controlling for Big Five personality traits and a host of other background variables, Bayesian regression results suggest no effects of either religious affiliation or Big Five personality traits measures on the three economic preference parameters analyzed here.

DISCUSSION

These findings highlight the complexity of the relationship between religion, personality traits, and economic preference parameters, suggesting that previously observed differences may be influenced by the preference measures used or other unobserved factors.

摘要

引言

社会科学领域先前的实证研究表明,不同宗教派别在各种感兴趣的结果方面存在显著差异,如教育程度、婚姻稳定性、财富或生育率。先前一小部分实验文献研究了宗教派别之间经济偏好参数(包括时间偏好和风险态度)可能存在的差异,这些差异或许可以解释上述不同。

方法

本研究通过纳入受试者的大五人格特质信息并分析与损失厌恶的潜在相关性,为现有的关于宗教与偏好的文献增添了内容。它将激励选择的实验数据与高中时期的宗教归属信息以及大五人格特质相结合,运用贝叶斯方差分析(ANOVA)和贝叶斯回归分析,来检验宗教派别与风险态度、时间偏好和损失厌恶之间可能存在的相关性。

结果

贝叶斯方差分析结果表明,本研究中所分析的宗教之间不存在偏好差异。在控制了大五人格特质和一系列其他背景变量后,贝叶斯回归结果表明,宗教归属或大五人格特质测量对这里分析的三个经济偏好参数均无影响。

讨论

这些发现凸显了宗教、人格特质和经济偏好参数之间关系的复杂性,表明先前观察到的差异可能受到所使用的偏好测量方法或其他未观察到的因素的影响。