• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏好、个性与健康行为:一项探索性经济实验的结果

Preferences, personality and health behaviors: results from an explorative economic experiment.

作者信息

Bessey Donata

机构信息

East Asia International College, Yonsei University, Yonseidae-gil 1, Wonju, 220-710, South Korea.

出版信息

Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Dec;18(4):437-456. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9236-1. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-018-9236-1
PMID:29476285
Abstract

This research note analyzes the relationship between experimentally elicited, incentivized economic preference parameters, personality traits, and three health behaviors: smoking, drinking, and physical activity. While there is a strand of economic research that uses proxy measures of risk and time preference that are not derived from an incentivized experiment and personality traits at the same time, and a considerably smaller one that uses experimentally elicited measures of risk and time preference only, the innovation of my work is to use experimentally elicited, incentivized preference measures and personality traits at the same time to explain a range of health behaviors. Findings presented in this paper suggest that personality traits seem to be more important determinants of health behaviors than economic preference parameters, and that Big Five personality traits, especially Agreeableness, seem to be more important determinants than the Grit score developed by Duckworth et al. (J Pers Soc Psychol 92(6):1087, 2007). When also controlling for a host of personality traits, risk preference is not related to the analyzed behaviors, but time preference is negatively related to smoking. When controlling for economic preferences and Big Five personality traits, the Grit score is unrelated to the analyzed health behaviors. Big Five openness is negatively related to the probability of engaging in physical activity, while Big Five agreeableness is negatively related to the probability of both drinking and binge drinking, but also to the probability of engaging in physical activity. Big Five neuroticism is negatively related to the probability of binge drinking.

摘要

本研究报告分析了实验诱导的、有激励措施的经济偏好参数、人格特质与三种健康行为(吸烟、饮酒和体育活动)之间的关系。虽然有一系列经济研究同时使用并非源自激励实验的风险和时间偏好代理指标以及人格特质,还有一小部分研究仅使用实验诱导的风险和时间偏好指标,但我这项研究的创新之处在于同时使用实验诱导的、有激励措施的偏好指标和人格特质来解释一系列健康行为。本文呈现的研究结果表明,人格特质似乎比经济偏好参数更能决定健康行为,而且大五人格特质,尤其是宜人性,似乎比达克沃思等人(《人格与社会心理学杂志》92(6):1087,2007年)提出的坚毅得分更能决定健康行为。在同时控制一系列人格特质时,风险偏好与所分析的行为无关,但时间偏好与吸烟呈负相关。在控制经济偏好和大五人格特质时,坚毅得分与所分析的健康行为无关。大五开放性与进行体育活动的可能性呈负相关,而大五宜人性与饮酒和暴饮的可能性均呈负相关,但也与进行体育活动的可能性呈负相关。大五神经质与暴饮的可能性呈负相关。

相似文献

1
Preferences, personality and health behaviors: results from an explorative economic experiment.偏好、个性与健康行为:一项探索性经济实验的结果
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Dec;18(4):437-456. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9236-1. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
2
Loss Aversion and Health Behaviors: Results from Two Incentivized Economic Experiments.损失厌恶与健康行为:两项激励性经济实验的结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;9(8):1040. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081040.
3
An Economic Perspective on Personality Traits and Alcohol Misuse: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.人格特质与酒精滥用的经济学视角:来自健康与退休研究的证据。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Jun;18(2):75-92.
4
Determinants of Lifestyle Choices Among South Korean College Students: An Experimental Analysis.韩国大学生生活方式选择的决定因素:一项实验分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Jan 20;15:93-105. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S333968. eCollection 2022.
5
Religion, personality, or none of them? Exploratory evidence on their correlations with economic preference parameters.宗教、性格,还是两者皆无?关于它们与经济偏好参数相关性的探索性证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1361910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361910. eCollection 2024.
6
Longevity, big five personality factors, and health behaviors: presidents from Washington to Nixon.长寿、大五人格因素与健康行为:从华盛顿到尼克松时期的总统们
J Psychol. 2005 May;139(3):273-86. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.3.273-288.
7
Social anxiety and the Big Five personality traits: the interactive relationship of trust and openness.社交焦虑与大五人格特质:信任与开放性的交互关系。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(3):212-22. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008032. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
8
Alcohol attitudes, motives, norms, and personality traits longitudinally classify nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers using discriminant function analysis.使用判别函数分析,从饮酒态度、动机、规范和人格特质方面对不饮酒者、适度饮酒者和暴饮者进行纵向分类。
Addict Behav. 2016 Oct;61:91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 10.
9
Leukocyte telomere length and personality: associations with the Big Five and Type D personality traits.白细胞端粒长度与个性:与大五人格和 D 型人格特质的关联。
Psychol Med. 2018 Apr;48(6):1008-1019. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002471. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
IQ and personality traits assessed in childhood as predictors of drinking and smoking behaviour in middle-aged adults: a 24-year follow-up study.童年期评估的智商和人格特质作为中年成年人饮酒和吸烟行为的预测因素:一项24年的随访研究。
Addiction. 2001 Nov;96(11):1615-28. doi: 10.1080/09652140120080741.

引用本文的文献

1
Exercise preference in stroke survivors: a concept analysis.中风幸存者的运动偏好:一项概念分析。
Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 13;15:1326649. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1326649. eCollection 2024.
2
Personality, negative affectivity and emotional intelligence: gender-differentiated relationships with physical exercise.人格、消极情感与情商:与体育锻炼的性别差异关系。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 30;14:1293310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1293310. eCollection 2023.
3
Personality and city culture predict attitudes and practices toward mosquitoes and mosquito-borne diseases in South Texas.

本文引用的文献

1
Delayed reward discounting and grit in men and women with and without obesity.有肥胖症和无肥胖症的男性及女性的延迟奖励折扣与毅力
Obes Sci Pract. 2015 Dec;1(2):131-135. doi: 10.1002/osp4.12. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
2
Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective.时间折扣能解释不健康行为吗?一项系统综述及强化学习视角
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar 12;8:76. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00076. eCollection 2014.
3
Personality, well-being, and health.人格、幸福感与健康。
个性和城市文化预测了南德克萨斯州的人们对蚊子和蚊媒疾病的态度和实践。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 7;10:919780. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.919780. eCollection 2022.
4
Eliciting risk preferences that predict risky health behavior: A comparison of two approaches.引出能预测危险健康行为的风险偏好:两种方法的比较。
Health Econ. 2022 May;31(5):836-858. doi: 10.1002/hec.4486. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
5
Determinants of Lifestyle Choices Among South Korean College Students: An Experimental Analysis.韩国大学生生活方式选择的决定因素:一项实验分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Jan 20;15:93-105. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S333968. eCollection 2022.
6
mHealth: Potentials and Risks for Addressing Mental Health and Well-Being Issues Among Nepali Adolescents.移动医疗:利用移动医疗解决尼泊尔青少年心理健康和幸福感问题的潜力与风险。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 23;9:563515. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.563515. eCollection 2021.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:719-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123.
4
Predicting (un)healthy behavior: A comparison of risk-taking propensity measures.预测(非)健康行为:冒险倾向测量方法的比较。
Judgm Decis Mak. 2012 Nov;7(6):716-727.
5
Personality trait level and change as predictors of health outcomes: findings from a national study of Americans (MIDUS).人格特质水平及其变化对健康结果的预测作用:来自美国全国性研究(MIDUS)的发现。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):4-12. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr072. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
6
Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing.大五人格短评估:除电话访谈外,在各种调查方法中均具有稳健性。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):548-67. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z.
7
Individual discount rates and smoking: evidence from a field experiment in Denmark.个人贴现率与吸烟:来自丹麦实地实验的证据。
J Health Econ. 2010 Sep;29(5):708-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
8
Risk and uncertainty in health investment.健康投资的风险与不确定性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Feb;12(1):79-85. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0238-2. Epub 2010 Mar 27.
9
Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior.个体实验室测量的贴现率可预测实际行为。
J Risk Uncertain. 2008 Dec 1;37(2-3):237-269. doi: 10.1007/s11166-008-9053-x.
10
A prospective study of weight gain during the college freshman and sophomore years.一项关于大学一、二年级学生体重增加情况的前瞻性研究。
Prev Med. 2009 Mar;48(3):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.12.009. Epub 2008 Dec 24.