Li Hailong, Alves Vinicius Vieira, Pednekar Amol, Manhard Mary Kate, Greer Joshua, Trout Andrew T, He Lili, Dillman Jonathan R
Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2024;48(6):955-962. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001648. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
This study aims to evaluate, on one MRI vendor's platform, the impact of deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction techniques on MRI radiomic features compared to conventional image reconstruction techniques.
Under IRB approval and informed consent, we prospectively collected undersampled coronal T2-weighted MR images of the abdomen (1.5 T; Philips Healthcare) from 17 pediatric and adult subjects and reconstructed them using a conventional image reconstruction technique (compressed sensitivity encoding [C-SENSE]) and two DL-based reconstruction techniques (SmartSpeed [Philips Healthcare, US FDA cleared] and SmartSpeed with Super Resolution [SmartSpeed-SuperRes, not US FDA cleared to date]). Eight regions of interest (ROIs) across organs/tissues (liver, spleen, kidney, pancreas, fat, and muscle) were manually placed. Eighty-six MRI radiomic features were then extracted. Pearson's correlation coefficients (PCCs) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated between (A) C-SENSE versus SmartSpeed, and (B) C-SENSE versus SmartSpeed-SuperRes. To quantify the impact from the perspective of the whole MR image, cross-ROI mean PCCs and ICCs were calculated for individual radiomic features. The impact of image reconstruction on individual radiomic features in different organs/tissues was evaluated using ANOVA analyses.
According to cross-ROI mean PCCs, 50 out of 86 radiomic features were highly correlated (PCC, ≥0.8) between SmartSpeed and C-SENSE, whereas only 15 radiomic features were highly correlated between SmartSpeed-SuperRes and C-SENSE reconstructions. According to cross-ROI mean ICCs, 58 out of 86 radiomic features had high agreements (ICC ≥0.75) between SmartSpeed and C-SENSE, whereas only 9 radiomic features had high agreements between SmartSpeed-SuperRes and C-SENSE reconstructions. For SmartSpeed reconstruction, the psoas muscle ROI appeared to be impacted most with the lowest median (IQR) correlation of 0.57 (0.25). The circular liver ROI was impacted most by SmartSpeed-SuperRes (PCC, 0.60 [0.22]). ANOVA analyses suggest that the impact of DL reconstruction algorithms on radiomic features varies significantly among different organs/tissues ( P < 0.001).
MRI radiomic features are significantly altered by DL-based reconstruction compared to a conventional reconstruction technique. The impact of DL reconstruction algorithms on radiomic features varies significantly between different organs/tissues.
本研究旨在在一个磁共振成像(MRI)供应商的平台上,评估基于深度学习(DL)的重建技术与传统图像重建技术相比,对MRI放射组学特征的影响。
在获得机构审查委员会(IRB)批准并取得知情同意后,我们前瞻性地收集了17名儿科和成人受试者的腹部欠采样冠状面T2加权MR图像(1.5T;飞利浦医疗),并使用传统图像重建技术(压缩感知编码[C-SENSE])和两种基于DL的重建技术(SmartSpeed[飞利浦医疗,已获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准]和具有超分辨率的SmartSpeed[SmartSpeed-SuperRes,截至目前尚未获美国FDA批准])对其进行重建。在各器官/组织(肝脏、脾脏、肾脏、胰腺、脂肪和肌肉)上手动放置了8个感兴趣区域(ROI)。然后提取了86个MRI放射组学特征。计算了(A)C-SENSE与SmartSpeed之间以及(B)C-SENSE与SmartSpeed-SuperRes之间的皮尔逊相关系数(PCC)和组内相关系数(ICC)。为了从整个MR图像的角度量化影响,计算了各个放射组学特征的跨ROI平均PCC和ICC。使用方差分析评估图像重建对不同器官/组织中各个放射组学特征的影响。
根据跨ROI平均PCC,86个放射组学特征中有50个在SmartSpeed与C-SENSE之间高度相关(PCC≥0.8),而在SmartSpeed-SuperRes与C-SENSE重建之间只有15个放射组学特征高度相关。根据跨ROI平均ICC,86个放射组学特征中有58个在SmartSpeed与C-SENSE之间具有高度一致性(ICC≥0.75),而在SmartSpeed-SuperRes与C-SENSE重建之间只有9个放射组学特征具有高度一致性。对于SmartSpeed重建,腰大肌ROI似乎受到的影响最大,中位数(四分位间距)相关性最低,为0.57(0.25)。圆形肝脏ROI受SmartSpeed-SuperRes的影响最大(PCC为0.60[0.22])。方差分析表明,DL重建算法对放射组学特征的影响在不同器官/组织之间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。
与传统重建技术相比,基于DL的重建显著改变了MRI放射组学特征。DL重建算法对放射组学特征的影响在不同器官/组织之间存在显著差异。