Ayala-Soldado Nahúm, Mora-Medina Rafael, Molina-López Ana María, Lora-Benítez Antonio Jesús, Moyano-Salvago Rosario
Department of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology and Toxicology, UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes ENZOEM, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Campus de Rabanales, University of Córdoba, Darwin Building, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 21;14(16):2418. doi: 10.3390/ani14162418.
The increasing use of the zebrafish () in scientific experiments has made it necessary to implement anesthesia protocols guaranteeing minimum pain and suffering for these animals and ensuring the reliability of the results obtained from their research. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of two anesthetics, eugenol and MS-222, in consecutive administrations and evaluate the zebrafish behaviour after repeated anesthesia. Thus, several zebrafish were anaesthetized with eugenol, MS-222, and buffered MS-222 three times repeatedly with a 24-h interval between each exposure. The induction and recovery periods were also timed. Their swimming frequency was determined after each exposure to assess their behaviour after the anesthesia. Anesthesia induction was quicker with eugenol compared to MS-222. However, eugenol presented longer recovery times, which were prolonged after each exposure. Also, the swimming frequency was reduced after each anesthesia with eugenol. The buffered version of MS-222 was more efficacious than the non-buffered one. Both versions of MS-222 did not affect the swimming frequency. Based on these findings, we recommend the utilization of MS-222 buffered rather than eugenol when repeated, brief-duration anesthesia is necessitated for a study.
斑马鱼在科学实验中的使用日益增加,因此有必要实施麻醉方案,以保证这些动物的痛苦最小化,并确保从其研究中获得的结果的可靠性。因此,我们旨在比较两种麻醉剂丁香酚和MS-222连续给药时的有效性,并评估斑马鱼在反复麻醉后的行为。于是,几只斑马鱼分别用丁香酚、MS-222和缓冲型MS-222反复麻醉三次,每次暴露间隔24小时。同时记录诱导期和恢复期的时间。每次暴露后测定它们的游泳频率,以评估麻醉后的行为。与MS-222相比,丁香酚的麻醉诱导更快。然而,丁香酚的恢复时间更长,每次暴露后都会延长。此外,每次用丁香酚麻醉后,游泳频率都会降低。缓冲型MS-222比非缓冲型更有效。两种MS-222都不影响游泳频率。基于这些发现,我们建议在研究需要反复进行短时间麻醉时,使用缓冲型MS-222而非丁香酚。