• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种玉米基因型耐盐性机制的比较分析:生长表现、离子调节和抗氧化响应。

Comparative analysis of salinity tolerance mechanisms in two maize genotypes: growth performance, ion regulation, and antioxidant responses.

机构信息

Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Kafrelsheikh, 33717, Egypt.

Department of Agriculture, Higher Technical Teachers' Training College, University of Buea, PO Box 249, Kumba, SWR, Cameroon.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05533-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-024-05533-3
PMID:39215238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11363523/
Abstract

This study investigates the differential responses of two maize genotypes, SC180 and SC168, to salt stress, aiming to elucidate the mechanisms underlying salinity tolerance and identify traits associated with improved stress resilience. Salinity stress, imposed by 150 mM NaCl, adversely affected various growth parameters in both genotypes. SC180 exhibited a more pronounced reduction in shoot length (13.6%) and root length (13.6%) compared to SC168, which showed minimal reductions (3.0% and 2.3%, respectively). Additionally, dry weight losses in SC180's leaves, stems, and roots were significantly greater than those in SC168. Under salinity stress, both genotypes accumulated Na in all organs, with SC168 showing higher Na + concentrations. However, K levels decreased more significantly in SC180's leaves than in SC168's. The study also assessed physiological responses, noting that SC180 experienced a substantial reduction in relative water content (RWC) in leaves (22.7%), while SC168's RWC remained relatively stable (5.15%). Proline accumulation, a marker for osmotic adjustment, increased 2.3-fold in SC168 compared onefold in SC180. Oxidative stress indicators, such as electrolyte leakage and hydrogen peroxide levels, were elevated in both genotypes under salt stress, with SC180 showing higher increases (48.5% and 48.7%, respectively) than SC168 (35.25% and 22.0%). Moreover, antioxidant enzymes (APX, CAT, POD, SOD, GR) activities were significantly enhanced in SC168 under salinity stress, whereas SC180 showed no significant changes in these activities. Stress indices, used to quantify and compare salinity tolerance, consistently ranked SC168 as more tolerant (average rank = 1.08) compared to SC180 (average rank = 1.92). Correlation analyses further confirmed that SC168's superior tolerance was associated with better Na + regulation, maintenance of K levels, and a robust antioxidant defense system. In conclusion, SC168 demonstrated greater resilience to salinity stress, attributed to its efficient ion regulation, stable water status, enhanced osmotic adjustment, and strong antioxidant response. These findings provide valuable insights for breeding and developing salinity-tolerant maize varieties.

摘要

本研究旨在探究两个玉米基因型(SC180 和 SC168)对盐胁迫的差异响应,以阐明耐盐机制并确定与提高胁迫抗性相关的特征。在 150mM NaCl 胁迫下,两种基因型的各种生长参数均受到不利影响。与 SC168 相比,SC180 的茎长(减少 13.6%)和根长(减少 13.6%)降幅更为显著,而 SC168 的降幅分别为 3.0%和 2.3%。此外,SC180 的叶片、茎和根的干重损失明显大于 SC168。在盐胁迫下,两种基因型均在所有器官中积累 Na,其中 SC168 的 Na+浓度较高。然而,SC180 的叶片中 K 水平下降更为显著。本研究还评估了生理响应,结果表明,SC180 的叶片相对水含量(RWC)显著降低(22.7%),而 SC168 的 RWC 相对稳定(5.15%)。脯氨酸积累作为渗透调节的标志物,在 SC168 中增加了 2.3 倍,而在 SC180 中增加了 1 倍。在盐胁迫下,两种基因型的电解质渗漏和过氧化氢水平等氧化应激指标均升高,其中 SC180 的升高幅度更大(分别为 48.5%和 48.7%),而 SC168 的升高幅度较小(分别为 35.25%和 22.0%)。此外,在盐胁迫下,SC168 中的抗氧化酶(APX、CAT、POD、SOD、GR)活性显著增强,而 SC180 中的这些活性没有显著变化。用于量化和比较耐盐性的应激指数一致将 SC168 评为更具耐盐性(平均等级=1.08),而将 SC180 评为耐盐性较差(平均等级=1.92)。相关性分析进一步证实,SC168 具有更高的耐盐性,与其高效的离子调节、稳定的水分状况、增强的渗透调节和强大的抗氧化响应有关。这些发现为培育和开发耐盐性玉米品种提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/1bf70106fc26/12870_2024_5533_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/4ae8bb52ac87/12870_2024_5533_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/aa09278990ba/12870_2024_5533_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/5853010bb37b/12870_2024_5533_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/6e17a0863f9f/12870_2024_5533_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/23daf069d4b7/12870_2024_5533_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/960ad8efacf6/12870_2024_5533_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/3352715feb8d/12870_2024_5533_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/a33e4cbd16c3/12870_2024_5533_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/0946c381688d/12870_2024_5533_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/b909269334df/12870_2024_5533_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/1bf70106fc26/12870_2024_5533_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/4ae8bb52ac87/12870_2024_5533_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/aa09278990ba/12870_2024_5533_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/5853010bb37b/12870_2024_5533_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/6e17a0863f9f/12870_2024_5533_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/23daf069d4b7/12870_2024_5533_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/960ad8efacf6/12870_2024_5533_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/3352715feb8d/12870_2024_5533_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/a33e4cbd16c3/12870_2024_5533_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/0946c381688d/12870_2024_5533_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/b909269334df/12870_2024_5533_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8e/11363523/1bf70106fc26/12870_2024_5533_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of salinity tolerance mechanisms in two maize genotypes: growth performance, ion regulation, and antioxidant responses.两种玉米基因型耐盐性机制的比较分析:生长表现、离子调节和抗氧化响应。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05533-3.
2
Evaluation of maize varieties via multivariate analysis: Roles of ionome, antioxidants, and autophagy in salt tolerance.通过多元分析评价玉米品种:离子组、抗氧化剂和自噬在耐盐性中的作用。
Plant Physiol. 2024 Sep 2;196(1):195-209. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiae335.
3
Understanding salinity stress responses in sorghum: exploring genotype variability and salt tolerance mechanisms.了解高粱中的盐胁迫反应:探索基因型变异性和耐盐机制。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jan 9;14:1296286. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1296286. eCollection 2023.
4
Silicon mediated improvement in the growth and ion homeostasis by decreasing Na uptake in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars exposed to salinity stress.硅通过降低盐胁迫下玉米(Zea mays L.)品种对钠的吸收来促进生长和离子稳态。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021 Jan;158:208-218. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.10.040. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
5
Effects of non-uniform root zone salinity on growth, ion regulation, and antioxidant defense system in two alfalfa cultivars.非均匀根区盐度对两种紫花苜蓿品种生长、离子调节和抗氧化防御系统的影响。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Nov;132:434-444. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.09.028. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
6
Morphological and physiological responses of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants to salinity.棉花(陆地棉)植株对盐分的形态和生理响应。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112807. eCollection 2014.
7
Comparative physiological analysis in the tolerance to salinity and drought individual and combination in two cotton genotypes with contrasting salt tolerance.两种耐盐性不同的棉花基因型对盐胁迫和干旱胁迫的耐受性的比较生理分析。
Physiol Plant. 2019 Feb;165(2):155-168. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12791. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
8
Similar and divergent responses to salinity stress of jamun ( L. Skeels) genotypes.不同基因型印度枣对盐胁迫的相似和不同响应。
PeerJ. 2024 May 14;12:e17311. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17311. eCollection 2024.
9
Comparative physiological and biochemical mechanisms of salt tolerance in five contrasting highland quinoa cultivars.五种不同高原藜麦品种耐盐的生理生化机制比较。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2279-8.
10
Responses of antioxidant gene, protein and enzymes to salinity stress in two genotypes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) differing in salt tolerance.两种耐盐性不同的多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne)基因型对盐胁迫的抗氧化基因、蛋白和酶的响应。
J Plant Physiol. 2012 Jan 15;169(2):146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Physiological Parameters, Antioxidant Defense, Ion Regulation, and Gene Expression in Two Distinct Maize Hybrids Under Salt Stress at Seedling Stage.苗期盐胁迫下两个不同玉米杂交种生理参数、抗氧化防御、离子调节及基因表达的比较分析
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;15(4):591. doi: 10.3390/life15040591.
2
The Role of Salicylic Acid in Salinity Stress Mitigation in : A Medicinal Species Native to South America.水杨酸在缓解盐胁迫中的作用:一种原产于南美洲的药用植物
Plants (Basel). 2024 Nov 4;13(21):3111. doi: 10.3390/plants13213111.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Progress on the Mechanism of Salt Tolerance in Maize: A Classic Field That Needs New Efforts.玉米耐盐机制的研究进展:一个需要新努力的经典领域
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jun 18;12(12):2356. doi: 10.3390/plants12122356.
2
Metabolomics reveals the response of hydroprimed maize to mitigate the impact of soil salinization.代谢组学揭示了水引发玉米缓解土壤盐渍化影响的响应。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 7;14:1109460. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1109460. eCollection 2023.
3
Bacterial-Mediated Salinity Stress Tolerance in Maize ( L.): A Fortunate Way toward Sustainable Agriculture.
细菌介导的玉米(L.)耐盐胁迫:通往可持续农业的幸运之路
ACS Omega. 2023 May 26;8(23):20471-20487. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00723. eCollection 2023 Jun 13.
4
Morpho-physiological responses and growth indices of triticale to drought and salt stresses.黑小麦对干旱和盐胁迫的形态-生理响应及生长指标。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 1;13(1):8896. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36119-y.
5
BK Isolate Ameliorates the Physicochemical Characteristics and Mineral Profile of Maize under Salt Stress.BK 分离株改善了盐胁迫下玉米的理化特性和矿物质概况。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Apr 19;12(8):1703. doi: 10.3390/plants12081703.
6
The effect of using fresh farmyard manure (animal manure) on the severity of in soil, root, stem, and kernels as well as lodging and borer incidence of maize plants.使用新鲜农家肥(动物粪便)对玉米植株土壤、根系、茎秆和籽粒病害严重程度以及倒伏和螟虫发生率的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 25;13:998440. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.998440. eCollection 2022.
7
Maize (Zea mays L.) responses to salt stress in terms of root anatomy, respiration and antioxidative enzyme activity.玉米(Zea mays L.)在根系解剖结构、呼吸作用和抗氧化酶活性方面对盐胁迫的响应。
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03972-4.
8
Suitable site selection by using full consistency method (FUCOM): a case study for maize cultivation in northwest Turkey.运用完全一致性方法(FUCOM)进行合适的选址:土耳其西北部玉米种植的案例研究
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022 Dec 2:1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02787-5.
9
The , , and Gene Transcripts Confirm Salinity Tolerance by Increasing Proline Production in Wheat ( L.).该基因、基因、基因和基因转录本通过增加小麦(普通小麦)脯氨酸的产生来证实其耐盐性。
Plants (Basel). 2022 Dec 6;11(23):3401. doi: 10.3390/plants11233401.
10
Modulating physiological and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms for enhanced climate resilience in cereal crops.调节生理和转录调控机制以增强谷类作物的气候适应力。
J Plant Physiol. 2022 Nov;278:153815. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153815. Epub 2022 Sep 16.