• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种不同高原藜麦品种耐盐的生理生化机制比较。

Comparative physiological and biochemical mechanisms of salt tolerance in five contrasting highland quinoa cultivars.

机构信息

Department of Horticulture, Foshan University, Foshan, 528000, China.

CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Plant Resources and Sustainable Use, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, 666303, China.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2279-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-020-2279-8
PMID:32050903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7017487/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chenopodium quinoa Willd., a halophytic crop, shows great variability among different genotypes in response to salt. To investigate the salinity tolerance mechanisms, five contrasting quinoa cultivars belonging to highland ecotype were compared for their seed germination (under 0, 100 and 400 mM NaCl) and seedling's responses under five salinity levels (0, 100, 200, 300 and 400 mM NaCl).

RESULTS

Substantial variations were found in plant size (biomass) and overall salinity tolerance (plant biomass in salt treatment as % of control) among the different quinoa cultivars. Plant salinity tolerance was negatively associated with plant size, especially at lower salinity levels (< 300 mM NaCl), but salt tolerance between seed germination and seedling growth was not closely correlated. Except for shoot/root ratio, all measured plant traits responded to salt in a genotype-specific way. Salt stress resulted in decreased plant height, leaf area, root length, and root/shoot ratio in each cultivar. With increasing salinity levels, leaf superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and lipid peroxidation generally increased, but catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) activities showed non-linear patterns. Organic solutes (soluble sugar, proline and protein) accumulated in leaves, whereas inorganic ion (Na and K) increased but K/Na decreased in both leaves and roots. Across different salinity levels and cultivars, without close relationships with antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD, or CAT), salinity tolerance was significantly negatively correlated with organic solute and malondialdehyde contents in leaves and inorganic ion contents in leaves or roots (except for root K content), but positively correlated with K/Na ratio in leaves or roots.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that leaf osmoregulation, K retention, Na exclusion, and ion homeostasis are the main physiological mechanisms conferring salinity tolerance of these cultivars, rather than the regulations of leaf antioxidative ability. As an index of salinity tolerance, K/Na ratio in leaves or roots can be used for the selective breeding of highland quinoa cultivars.

摘要

背景

藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)是一种盐生作物,不同基因型对盐的反应存在很大差异。为了研究耐盐机制,比较了属于高地生态型的五个不同藜麦品种在 0、100 和 400 mM NaCl 下的种子萌发和五个盐度水平(0、100、200、300 和 400 mM NaCl)下幼苗的反应。

结果

不同藜麦品种之间的植株大小(生物量)和整体耐盐性(盐处理下的植株生物量与对照相比的百分比)存在显著差异。植物耐盐性与植株大小呈负相关,特别是在较低的盐度水平(<300 mM NaCl)下,但种子萌发和幼苗生长之间的耐盐性相关性不大。除了根冠比外,所有测量的植物性状都以基因型特异性的方式对盐做出反应。盐胁迫导致每个品种的株高、叶面积、根长和根冠比降低。随着盐度水平的升高,叶片中超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性和脂质过氧化通常增加,但过氧化氢酶(CAT)和过氧化物酶(POD)活性呈非线性模式。有机溶质(可溶性糖、脯氨酸和蛋白质)在叶片中积累,而无机离子(Na 和 K)在叶片和根部增加,但 K/Na 降低。在不同的盐度水平和品种中,与抗氧化酶活性(SOD、POD 或 CAT)没有密切关系,耐盐性与叶片中有机溶质和丙二醛含量以及叶片或根部无机离子含量(根 K 含量除外)呈显著负相关,但与叶片或根部的 K/Na 比值呈正相关。

结论

我们的结果表明,叶片渗透调节、K 保留、Na 排斥和离子稳态是赋予这些品种耐盐性的主要生理机制,而不是叶片抗氧化能力的调节。作为耐盐性的指标,叶片或根部的 K/Na 比值可用于高地藜麦品种的选择性育种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/84a76704917d/12870_2020_2279_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/33259483d4cf/12870_2020_2279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/3147a35b5bb6/12870_2020_2279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/386c48480e37/12870_2020_2279_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/a351014e8be3/12870_2020_2279_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/a0d5a43c44a8/12870_2020_2279_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/560a8e027a10/12870_2020_2279_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/fd7364b87a87/12870_2020_2279_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/84a76704917d/12870_2020_2279_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/33259483d4cf/12870_2020_2279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/3147a35b5bb6/12870_2020_2279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/386c48480e37/12870_2020_2279_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/a351014e8be3/12870_2020_2279_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/a0d5a43c44a8/12870_2020_2279_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/560a8e027a10/12870_2020_2279_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/fd7364b87a87/12870_2020_2279_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b897/7017487/84a76704917d/12870_2020_2279_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative physiological and biochemical mechanisms of salt tolerance in five contrasting highland quinoa cultivars.五种不同高原藜麦品种耐盐的生理生化机制比较。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2279-8.
2
Variation in salinity tolerance of four lowland genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as assessed by growth, physiological traits, and sodium transporter gene expression.四种藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)低地基因型耐盐性的变化,通过生长、生理特性和钠离子转运基因表达来评估。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011 Nov;49(11):1333-41. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
3
Genotypic differences in agro-physiological, biochemical and isotopic responses to salinity stress in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants: Prospects for salinity tolerance and yield stability.基因型差异对藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)植物盐胁迫的农艺生理、生化和同位素响应:耐盐性和产量稳定性的前景。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Aug;129:411-420. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.06.023. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
Rapid regulation of the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase activity is essential to salinity tolerance in two halophyte species, Atriplex lentiformis and Chenopodium quinoa.快速调节质膜H⁺-ATP酶活性对于两种盐生植物——滨藜属的透镜状滨藜和藜麦属的藜麦的耐盐性至关重要。
Ann Bot. 2015 Feb;115(3):481-94. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu219. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
5
Reduced tonoplast fast-activating and slow-activating channel activity is essential for conferring salinity tolerance in a facultative halophyte, quinoa.质膜快速激活和慢速激活通道活性降低是藜麦这种兼性盐生植物耐盐性的必要条件。
Plant Physiol. 2013 Jun;162(2):940-52. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.216572. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
6
Understanding the role of root-related traits in salinity tolerance of quinoa accessions with contrasting epidermal bladder cell patterning.了解表皮囊泡细胞形态差异较大的藜麦品种耐盐性中根系相关性状的作用。
Planta. 2020 May 5;251(5):103. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03395-1.
7
Enhancing quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) growth in saline environments through salt-tolerant rhizobacteria from halophyte biotope.通过盐生植物生境中的耐盐根际细菌来提高藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa)在盐渍环境中的生长。
Physiol Plant. 2024 Jul-Aug;176(4):e14466. doi: 10.1111/ppl.14466.
8
Agro-Morphological, Yield and Quality Traits and Interrelationship with Yield Stability in Quinoa ( Willd.) Genotypes under Saline Marginal Environment.盐碱边缘环境下藜麦(藜麦)基因型的农艺形态、产量和品质性状及其与产量稳定性的相互关系
Plants (Basel). 2020 Dec 13;9(12):1763. doi: 10.3390/plants9121763.
9
Salicylic Acid Manipulates Ion Accumulation and Distribution in Favor of Salinity Tolerance in &nbsp;.水杨酸有利于 &nbsp;离子积累和分布,从而提高其耐盐性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 29;19(3):1576. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031576.
10
Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance in quinoa is determined by differential control of xylem Na(+) loading and stomatal density.在藜麦中,耐盐性的基因型差异是由木质部 Na(+)加载和气孔密度的差异控制决定的。
J Plant Physiol. 2013 Jul 1;170(10):906-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening and identification of grain sorghum germplasm for salt tolerance at seedling stage.高粱种质资源苗期耐盐性的筛选与鉴定
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 20;16:1610685. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1610685. eCollection 2025.
2
CqHKT1 and CqSOS1 mediate genotype-dependent Na exclusion under high salinity conditions in quinoa.CqHKT1和CqSOS1在高盐条件下介导藜麦中依赖基因型的钠外排。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 18;16:1597647. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1597647. eCollection 2025.
3
Fungal endophytes boost salt tolerance and seed quality in quinoa ecotypes along a latitudinal gradient.

本文引用的文献

1
TANSLEY REVIEW No. 2: REGULATION OF PH AND GENERATION OF OSMOLARITY IN VASCULAR PLANTS: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN RELATION TO EFFICIENCY OF USE OF ENERGY, NITROGEN AND WATER.坦斯利评论第2期:维管植物中pH的调节与渗透压的产生:与能量、氮和水利用效率相关的成本效益分析
New Phytol. 1985 Sep;101(1):25-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02816.x.
2
Beyond the ionic and osmotic response to salinity in Chenopodium quinoa: functional elements of successful halophytism.藜麦对盐分的离子和渗透响应之外:成功盐生植物的功能要素
Funct Plant Biol. 2011 Oct;38(10):818-831. doi: 10.1071/FP11088.
3
A Molecular View of Plant Local Adaptation: Incorporating Stress-Response Networks.
真菌内生菌提高了藜麦生态型沿纬度梯度的耐盐性和种子质量。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 9;16:1602553. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1602553. eCollection 2025.
4
Optimizing Mask R-CNN for enhanced quinoa panicle detection and segmentation in precision agriculture.优化Mask R-CNN以增强精准农业中藜麦穗的检测与分割
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 2;16:1472688. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1472688. eCollection 2025.
5
The short-term effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on cold resistance in based on transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis.基于转录组学和代谢组学分析的氮磷肥对耐寒性的短期影响
Front Plant Sci. 2025 May 14;16:1598628. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1598628. eCollection 2025.
6
The Agro-Physiological and Phytochemical Potential of Quinoa ( Willd.) Under Saline Stress: A Comprehensive Investigation of Nutritional Properties and Antioxidant Activities.盐胁迫下藜麦(藜麦)的农业生理和植物化学潜力:营养特性和抗氧化活性的综合研究。
Plants (Basel). 2025 May 15;14(10):1482. doi: 10.3390/plants14101482.
7
Identification of the Gene Family in Quinoa and Its Potential Role in Regulating Flavonoid Synthesis Under Different Stress Conditions.藜麦中基因家族的鉴定及其在不同胁迫条件下调控类黄酮合成中的潜在作用。
Biology (Basel). 2025 Apr 20;14(4):446. doi: 10.3390/biology14040446.
8
Identification and characterization of the Quinoa AP2/ERF gene family and their expression patterns in response to salt stress.藜麦 AP2/ERF 基因家族的鉴定和特征分析及其对盐胁迫响应的表达模式。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 27;14(1):29529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81046-1.
9
Salt tolerance in wheat is associated with the maintenance of shoot biomass, stomatal conductance, and sucrose in the phloem.小麦的耐盐性与地上部生物量、气孔导度以及韧皮部中蔗糖的维持有关。
Plant Environ Interact. 2024 Sep 11;5(5):e70008. doi: 10.1002/pei3.70008. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Quinoa: A Promising Crop for Resolving the Bottleneck of Cultivation in Soils Affected by Multiple Environmental Abiotic Stresses.藜麦:解决受多种环境非生物胁迫影响土壤中种植瓶颈的一种有前景的作物。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;13(15):2117. doi: 10.3390/plants13152117.
植物局部适应的分子视角:纳入应激反应网络。
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019 Apr 29;70:559-583. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100114. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Understanding the Molecular Basis of Salt Sequestration in Epidermal Bladder Cells of Chenopodium quinoa.了解藜科表皮膀胱细胞中盐分截留的分子基础。
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 8;28(19):3075-3085.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
Differential response of quinoa genotypes to drought and foliage-applied HO in relation to oxidative damage, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant capacity.藜麦基因型对干旱和叶面喷施 HO 的差异响应与氧化损伤、渗透调节和抗氧化能力有关。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Nov 30;164:344-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
6
Genotypic differences in physiological and biochemical responses to salinity stress in melon (Cucumis melo L.) plants: Prospects for selection of salt tolerant landraces.甜瓜(Cucumis melo L.)植株对盐分胁迫的生理生化反应的基因型差异:耐盐地方品种的选择前景
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Oct;119:294-311. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
7
Potential growth and drought tolerance of eight desert grasses: lack of a trade-off?八种荒漠草的潜在生长与耐旱性:不存在权衡取舍?
Oecologia. 2000 Apr;123(1):90-98. doi: 10.1007/s004420050993.
8
Innovations in Health Value and Functional Food Development of Quinoa ( Willd.).藜麦(Willd.)在健康价值与功能性食品开发方面的创新
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2015 Jul;14(4):431-445. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12135. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
9
Salares versus coastal ecotypes of quinoa: Salinity responses in Chilean landraces from contrasting habitats.藜麦的盐碱地生态型与沿海生态型:来自不同生境的智利地方品种的盐分响应
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Apr;101:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
10
Macroevolutionary patterns of salt tolerance in angiosperms.被子植物耐盐性的宏观进化模式。
Ann Bot. 2015 Feb;115(3):333-41. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu229. Epub 2014 Nov 30.