Suppr超能文献

采用血气分析仪、血糖仪和标准实验室方法测量新生儿脑脊液中的葡萄糖。

Neonatal CSF glucose measured by blood gas analyzer, glucometer, and standard laboratory methods.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Department of Biochemistry, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2024 Dec;44(12):1795-1799. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02106-y. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine agreement between neonatal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose measured by standard laboratory method versus blood gas analyzers (BGA) and glucometers.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in a level III neonatal unit on 97 neonates undergoing lumbar puncture. Agreement was estimated by Lin's coefficient of concordance and Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

Lin's coefficient of concordance between the CSF laboratory and BGA glucose values was higher than that between CSF laboratory and glucometer glucose {P value < 0.001}. Bland-Altman plot of CSF glucose values by laboratory and BGA methods showed a bias of -0.137 mmol/l. The plot of laboratory versus glucometer methods showed a bias of -0.863 mmol/l. A linear regression equation to predict laboratory CSF glucose from BGA values and glucometer values had an R of 0.975 and 0.971 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CSF glucose measured by blood gas analyzers may be used as a point-of-care test among neonates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

摘要

目的

确定通过标准实验室方法与血气分析仪(BGA)和血糖仪测量的新生儿脑脊液(CSF)葡萄糖之间的一致性。

研究设计

这项前瞻性、观察性、横断面研究在三级新生儿病房的 97 名接受腰椎穿刺的新生儿中进行。通过林氏一致性系数和 Bland-Altman 图评估一致性。

结果

CSF 实验室与 BGA 葡萄糖值之间的林氏一致性系数高于 CSF 实验室与血糖仪葡萄糖值之间的系数(P 值<0.001)。实验室和 BGA 方法测定的 CSF 葡萄糖值的 Bland-Altman 图显示偏倚为-0.137mmol/l。实验室与血糖仪方法的图显示偏倚为-0.863mmol/l。用于从 BGA 值和血糖仪值预测实验室 CSF 葡萄糖的线性回归方程的 R 分别为 0.975 和 0.971。

结论

血气分析仪测量的 CSF 葡萄糖可作为新生儿即时检测的一种方法。

试验注册

不适用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验