Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Department of Biochemistry, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
J Perinatol. 2024 Dec;44(12):1795-1799. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02106-y. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
To determine agreement between neonatal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose measured by standard laboratory method versus blood gas analyzers (BGA) and glucometers.
This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in a level III neonatal unit on 97 neonates undergoing lumbar puncture. Agreement was estimated by Lin's coefficient of concordance and Bland-Altman plot.
Lin's coefficient of concordance between the CSF laboratory and BGA glucose values was higher than that between CSF laboratory and glucometer glucose {P value < 0.001}. Bland-Altman plot of CSF glucose values by laboratory and BGA methods showed a bias of -0.137 mmol/l. The plot of laboratory versus glucometer methods showed a bias of -0.863 mmol/l. A linear regression equation to predict laboratory CSF glucose from BGA values and glucometer values had an R of 0.975 and 0.971 respectively.
CSF glucose measured by blood gas analyzers may be used as a point-of-care test among neonates.
Not applicable.
确定通过标准实验室方法与血气分析仪(BGA)和血糖仪测量的新生儿脑脊液(CSF)葡萄糖之间的一致性。
这项前瞻性、观察性、横断面研究在三级新生儿病房的 97 名接受腰椎穿刺的新生儿中进行。通过林氏一致性系数和 Bland-Altman 图评估一致性。
CSF 实验室与 BGA 葡萄糖值之间的林氏一致性系数高于 CSF 实验室与血糖仪葡萄糖值之间的系数(P 值<0.001)。实验室和 BGA 方法测定的 CSF 葡萄糖值的 Bland-Altman 图显示偏倚为-0.137mmol/l。实验室与血糖仪方法的图显示偏倚为-0.863mmol/l。用于从 BGA 值和血糖仪值预测实验室 CSF 葡萄糖的线性回归方程的 R 分别为 0.975 和 0.971。
血气分析仪测量的 CSF 葡萄糖可作为新生儿即时检测的一种方法。
不适用。