• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较深度学习在明场显微镜图像中对慢性淋巴细胞白血病细胞分割的性能。

Comparing Deep Learning Performance for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Cell Segmentation in Brightfield Microscopy Images.

作者信息

Vašinková Markéta, Doleží Vít, Vašinek Michal, Gajdoš Petr, Kriegová Eva

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, FEECS, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University & University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Bioinform Biol Insights. 2024 Sep 5;18:11779322241272387. doi: 10.1177/11779322241272387. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1177/11779322241272387
PMID:39246684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378236/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article focuses on the detection of cells in low-contrast brightfield microscopy images; in our case, it is chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells. The automatic detection of cells from brightfield time-lapse microscopic images brings new opportunities in cell morphology and migration studies; to achieve the desired results, it is advisable to use state-of-the-art image segmentation methods that not only detect the cell but also detect its boundaries with the highest possible accuracy, thus defining its shape and dimensions.

METHODS

We compared eight state-of-the-art neural network architectures with different backbone encoders for image data segmentation, namely U-net, U-net++, the Pyramid Attention Network, the Multi-Attention Network, LinkNet, the Feature Pyramid Network, DeepLabV3, and DeepLabV3+. The training process involved training each of these networks for 1000 epochs using the PyTorch and PyTorch Lightning libraries. For instance segmentation, the watershed algorithm and three-class image semantic segmentation were used. We also used StarDist, a deep learning-based tool for object detection with star-convex shapes.

RESULTS

The optimal combination for semantic segmentation was the U-net++ architecture with a ResNeSt-269 background with a data set intersection over a union score of 0.8902. For the cell characteristics examined (area, circularity, solidity, perimeter, radius, and shape index), the difference in mean value using different chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cell segmentation approaches appeared to be statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test,  < .0001).

CONCLUSION

We found that overall, the algorithms demonstrate equal agreement with ground truth, but with the comparison, it can be seen that the different approaches prefer different morphological features of the cells. Consequently, choosing the most suitable method for instance-based cell segmentation depends on the particular application, namely, the specific cellular traits being investigated.

摘要

目标

本文聚焦于低对比度明场显微镜图像中的细胞检测;在我们的案例中,指的是慢性淋巴细胞白血病细胞。从明场延时显微镜图像中自动检测细胞为细胞形态学和迁移研究带来了新机遇;为取得理想结果,宜采用最先进的图像分割方法,该方法不仅能检测细胞,还能尽可能精确地检测其边界,从而确定其形状和尺寸。

方法

我们比较了八种具有不同骨干编码器的最先进神经网络架构用于图像数据分割,即U-net、U-net++、金字塔注意力网络、多注意力网络、LinkNet、特征金字塔网络、DeepLabV3和DeepLabV3+。训练过程包括使用PyTorch和PyTorch Lightning库对这些网络分别进行1000个轮次的训练。对于实例分割,使用了分水岭算法和三类图像语义分割。我们还使用了StarDist,这是一个基于深度学习的用于检测星凸形状物体的工具。

结果

语义分割的最佳组合是具有ResNeSt - 269背景的U-net++架构,其数据集交并比分数为0.8902。对于所检测的细胞特征(面积、圆形度、紧实度、周长、半径和形状指数),使用不同慢性淋巴细胞白血病细胞分割方法的平均值差异在统计学上似乎具有显著性(曼 - 惠特尼检验,<0.0001)。

结论

我们发现总体而言,这些算法与真实情况的一致性相当,但通过比较可以看出,不同方法偏好细胞的不同形态特征。因此,选择最适合基于实例的细胞分割方法取决于具体应用,即所研究的特定细胞特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/ba35081e02cc/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/acfe2d757fa3/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/8eb4f56a9eb8/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/80b38ef0deb8/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/2de58de0ba8b/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/59c3c2afaaf6/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/8c1d02ff9044/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/47cde7020fde/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/cc5702dfc150/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/24218883b50e/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/ba35081e02cc/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/acfe2d757fa3/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/8eb4f56a9eb8/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/80b38ef0deb8/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/2de58de0ba8b/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/59c3c2afaaf6/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/8c1d02ff9044/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/47cde7020fde/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/cc5702dfc150/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/24218883b50e/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/11378236/ba35081e02cc/10.1177_11779322241272387-fig10.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing Deep Learning Performance for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Cell Segmentation in Brightfield Microscopy Images.比较深度学习在明场显微镜图像中对慢性淋巴细胞白血病细胞分割的性能。
Bioinform Biol Insights. 2024 Sep 5;18:11779322241272387. doi: 10.1177/11779322241272387. eCollection 2024.
2
MADR-Net: multi-level attention dilated residual neural network for segmentation of medical images.MADR-Net:用于医学图像分割的多层次注意扩张残差神经网络。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 3;14(1):12699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63538-2.
3
Evaluating Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Nucleus Segmentation from Brightfield Cell Microscopy Images.评估基于明场细胞显微镜图像的细胞核分割的极深卷积神经网络。
SLAS Discov. 2021 Oct;26(9):1125-1137. doi: 10.1177/24725552211023214. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography.卷积神经网络在乳腺 X 线摄影中用于自动肿块分割。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec 9;21(Suppl 1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3521-y.
5
Semantic Segmentation of Smartphone Wound Images: Comparative Analysis of AHRF and CNN-Based Approaches.智能手机伤口图像的语义分割:基于AHRF和CNN方法的比较分析
IEEE Access. 2020;8:181590-181604. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3014175. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Improved U-Net based on contour prediction for efficient segmentation of rectal cancer.基于轮廓预测的改进型 U-Net 用于直肠癌的高效分割。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jan;213:106493. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106493. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
7
Research on Ground Object Classification Method of High Resolution Remote-Sensing Images Based on Improved DeeplabV3.基于改进型 DeeplabV3 的高分辨率遥感图像地物分类方法研究
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 2;22(19):7477. doi: 10.3390/s22197477.
8
Boundary Aware Semantic Segmentation using Pyramid-dilated Dense U-Net for Lung Segmentation in Computed Tomography Images.使用金字塔扩张密集U-Net的边界感知语义分割用于计算机断层扫描图像中的肺部分割
J Med Phys. 2023 Apr-Jun;48(2):161-174. doi: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_1_23. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
9
ADR-Net: Context extraction network based on M-Net for medical image segmentation.ADR-Net:基于M-Net的医学图像分割上下文提取网络。
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):4254-4264. doi: 10.1002/mp.14364. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
10
HMA-Net: A deep U-shaped network combined with HarDNet and multi-attention mechanism for medical image segmentation.HMA-Net:一种结合 HarDNet 和多注意力机制的深度 U 形网络,用于医学图像分割。
Med Phys. 2023 Mar;50(3):1635-1646. doi: 10.1002/mp.16065. Epub 2022 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Cell Tracking Challenge: 10 years of objective benchmarking.细胞追踪挑战赛:10 年客观基准测试。
Nat Methods. 2023 Jul;20(7):1010-1020. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01879-y. Epub 2023 May 18.
2
Self-initialized active contours for microscopic cell image segmentation.基于主动轮廓模型的自动初始化方法用于微观细胞图像分割。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 2;12(1):14947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18708-5.
3
Automatic liver tumor segmentation used the cascade multi-scale attention architecture method based on 3D U-Net.自动肝脏肿瘤分割采用了基于3D U-Net的级联多尺度注意力架构方法。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Oct;17(10):1915-1922. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02653-9. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
TrackMate 7: integrating state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms into tracking pipelines.TrackMate 7:将最先进的分割算法集成到跟踪管道中。
Nat Methods. 2022 Jul;19(7):829-832. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01507-1. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
5
Whole-cell segmentation of tissue images with human-level performance using large-scale data annotation and deep learning.使用大规模数据标注和深度学习实现具有人类水平性能的组织图像全细胞分割。
Nat Biotechnol. 2022 Apr;40(4):555-565. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01094-0. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
6
Segmentation of Overlapping Cervical Cells with Mask Region Convolutional Neural Network.基于掩模区域卷积神经网络的重叠宫颈细胞分割。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Oct 4;2021:3890988. doi: 10.1155/2021/3890988. eCollection 2021.
7
Towards a Better Characterisation of Leukemic Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: Cell-Size Heterogeneity Reflects Their Activation Status and Migratory Abilities.更好地表征慢性淋巴细胞白血病中的白血病细胞:细胞大小异质性反映其激活状态和迁移能力。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;13(19):4922. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194922.
8
Automatic image annotation for fluorescent cell nuclei segmentation.用于荧光细胞核分割的自动图像标注
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250093. eCollection 2021.
9
Automatic lumbar spinal MRI image segmentation with a multi-scale attention network.基于多尺度注意力网络的腰椎脊髓磁共振成像图像自动分割
Neural Comput Appl. 2021;33(18):11589-11602. doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-05856-4. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation.Cellpose:一种通用的细胞分割算法。
Nat Methods. 2021 Jan;18(1):100-106. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x. Epub 2020 Dec 14.