Amare Friew, Alemu Yehualaw, Enichalew Mollalign, Demilie Yalemsew, Adamu Solomon
Department of Sport Science, Sport Sciences Academy, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 11;16(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00982-7.
Twenty inactive males (BMI 27.67 ± 0.88 kg/m, age 49.15 ± 2.58 years) participated in an eight-week were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups (combined (CT), resistance (RT), and aerobic (AT)) exercise modalities to assess within-subject and between group changes in glycolipid profile. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANCOVA.
Pre-post mean values of body fat percentage (%BF), area under the curve (AUC), low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol (TC) decreased in all three groups. The main effect of exercise modality on the AUC (F (2, 26) = 10.577, P = 0.001, η = 0.569) was significant. Post-hoc analyses revealed that the RT group (-30.653 ± 6.766, p = 0.001) with 11.53% and the CT group (M = -0.896, SE = 3.347, P = 0.015) with 3.79% exhibited significantly greater reductions in AUC compared to the AT group. LDL levels showed significant different between groups (F (2, 26) = 6.33, p = 0.009, η = 0.442), specially significantly 3.7% lowered in AT (MD = 4.783, SE = 1.563, P = 0.002) and 3.79% lower in CT (MD = 4.57, SE = 1.284, P = 0.008) groups compared to the RT group. AT significantly reduced TC by 17.716 ± 5.705 mg/dL (p = 0.02) compared to RT, representing a 7.97% decrease.
Exercise type significantly influences lipid profiles and glycemic control. Notably, both aerobic and combined training demonstrated a superior ability to modulate the lipid profile, and resistance training and combined training were more effective in reducing the AUC.
May, 31st 2024.
PACTR202405463745521 "Retrospectively registered".
20名不活跃男性(体重指数27.67±0.88kg/m²,年龄49.15±2.58岁)参与了一项为期8周的研究,他们被随机分配到三个干预组之一(联合训练组(CT)、抗阻训练组(RT)和有氧训练组(AT)),以评估糖脂谱在个体内和组间的变化。数据采用重复测量协方差分析进行分析。
所有三组的体脂百分比(%BF)、曲线下面积(AUC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和总胆固醇(TC)的前后均值均下降。运动方式对AUC的主要效应显著(F(2, 26)=10.577,P = 0.001,η = 0.569)。事后分析显示,抗阻训练组(-30.653±6.766,p = 0.001)的AUC降低了11.53%,联合训练组(M = -0.896,SE = 3.347,P = 0.015)的AUC降低了3.79%,与有氧训练组相比,降幅显著更大。三组间LDL水平存在显著差异(F(2, 26)=6.33,p = 0.009,η = 0.442),特别是有氧训练组(MD = 4.783,SE = 1.563,P = 0.002)和联合训练组(MD = 4.57,SE = 1.284,P = 0.008)的LDL水平相比抗阻训练组分别显著降低了3.7%和3.79%。与抗阻训练组相比,有氧训练组的TC显著降低了17.716±5.705mg/dL(p = 0.02),降幅为7.97%。
运动类型对血脂谱和血糖控制有显著影响。值得注意的是,有氧训练和联合训练在调节血脂谱方面表现出更强的能力,抗阻训练和联合训练在降低AUC方面更有效。
2024年5月31日。
PACTR202405463745521“回顾性注册”