Suppr超能文献

有氧运动、抗阻运动或联合运动训练与超重或肥胖成年人心血管风险特征:CardioRACE 试验。

Aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise training and cardiovascular risk profile in overweight or obese adults: the CardioRACE trial.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, 534 Wallace Road, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

Department of Statistics, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2024 Apr 1;45(13):1127-1142. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad827.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To determine the comparative efficacy of resistance, aerobic, and combined resistance plus aerobic exercise on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 406 adults aged 35-70 years with overweight or obesity and elevated blood pressure. Participants were randomly assigned to resistance (n = 102), aerobic (n = 101), combined resistance plus aerobic exercise (n = 101), or no-exercise control (n = 102). All exercise participants were prescribed 1 h of time-matched supervised exercise (the combination group with 30 min of each resistance and aerobic exercise) three times per week for 1 year. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 1 year in the standardized composite Z-score of four well-established CVD risk factors: systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, fasting glucose, and per cent body fat.

RESULTS

Among 406 participants (53% women), 381 (94%) completed 1-year follow-up. Compared with the control group, the composite Z-score decreased at 1 year, which indicates improved CVD risk profile, in the aerobic {mean difference, -0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.27 to -0.04]; P = .01} and combination [mean difference, -0.16 (95% CI: -0.27 to -0.04); P = .009] groups, but not in the resistance [mean difference, -0.02 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.09); P = .69] group. Both aerobic and combination groups had greater reductions in the composite Z-score compared with the resistance group (both P = .03), and there was no difference between the aerobic and combination groups (P = .96). Regarding the four individual CVD risk factors, only per cent body fat decreased in all three exercise groups at 1 year, but systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and fasting glucose did not decrease in any exercise groups, compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with overweight or obesity, aerobic exercise alone or combined resistance plus aerobic exercise, but not resistance exercise alone, improved composite CVD risk profile compared with the control.

摘要

背景与目的

确定抗阻运动、有氧健身运动和抗阻加有氧健身运动相结合对心血管疾病(CVD)风险特征的比较疗效。

方法

这项随机对照试验纳入了 406 名年龄在 35-70 岁之间、超重或肥胖且血压升高的成年人。参与者被随机分配至抗阻运动组(n=102)、有氧健身运动组(n=101)、抗阻加有氧健身运动联合组(n=101)或无运动对照组(n=102)。所有运动组参与者均被规定每周进行 3 次、每次 1 小时的时间匹配监督运动(联合组为 30 分钟的抗阻运动和 30 分钟的有氧健身运动),持续 1 年。主要结局是从基线到 1 年时四项公认的 CVD 风险因素的标准化综合 Z 评分的变化:收缩压、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇、空腹血糖和体脂百分比。

结果

在 406 名参与者(53%为女性)中,有 381 名(94%)完成了 1 年的随访。与对照组相比,有氧运动组和联合运动组的综合 Z 评分在 1 年内下降,这表明 CVD 风险状况得到改善,分别为 -0.15(95%可信区间[CI]:-0.27 至 -0.04);P=0.01)和 -0.16(95%CI:-0.27 至 -0.04);P=0.009),但抗阻运动组没有变化,为 -0.02(95%CI:-0.14 至 0.09);P=0.69)。与抗阻运动组相比,有氧运动组和联合运动组的综合 Z 评分均有更大幅度的降低(均 P=0.03),且有氧运动组和联合运动组之间无差异(P=0.96)。关于四项 CVD 个体风险因素,仅在所有三个运动组中,体脂百分比在 1 年内有所下降,但与对照组相比,收缩压、LDL 胆固醇和空腹血糖在任何运动组中均未下降。

结论

在超重或肥胖的成年人中,与对照组相比,单独进行有氧健身运动或联合进行抗阻加有氧健身运动可改善综合 CVD 风险特征,但单独进行抗阻运动没有改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0847/10984570/5c15b34f1d28/ehad827_ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验