Atkins Whitley C, Foster Josh, McKenna Zachary J, Jarrard Caitlin P, Watso Joseph C, Belval Luke N, Jay Ollie, Crandall Craig G
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Dallas, TX.
Heat and Health Research Incubator, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2025 Feb 1;57(2):365-375. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003557. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Burn injuries that require grafting impair thermoregulation, which may dissuade individuals with such injuries from being physically active. We tested the hypothesis that cooling modalities attenuate core temperature elevations and perceptions of heat stress during physical activity in the heat among adults with well-healed burn injuries.
Adults with no burn injuries (non-burned), 20%-40% body surface area burn injuries (moderate burn), and >40% body surface area burn injuries (large burn) performed 1 h of moderate-intensity exercise (2.5 ± 0.2 mph and 2% grade) on four different occasions in two environmental conditions (30°C and 39°C, 40% relative humidity). Within each environmental condition, we applied one of the following cooling modalities, random assigned, for each visit: no cooling (control), fan at 4 m·s -1 (fan), water spray every 5 min (water spray; scaled to burn area size), or a combination of water spray + fan.
In 30°C, perceptual strain index (PeSI) was reduced in the non-burned and moderate burn groups with water spray + fan, whereas PeSI was reduced with all cooling modalities in the large burn group. The cooling modalities did not affect core temperature responses. In the 39°C environment, water spray and water spray + fan attenuated the elevation in core temperature ( P ≤ 0.007) only in the large burn group. In the moderate burn group, PeSI was decreased with water spray + fan ( P = 0.017). In the large burn group, both water spray alone and water spray + fan ( P ≤ 0.041) lowered PeSI.
For both environments across burn groups, the applied cooling modalities were generally more effective at reducing indices of perceptual strain relative to indices of thermal strain (e.g., core temperature).
需要植皮的烧伤会损害体温调节功能,这可能会使有此类损伤的个体不愿进行体育活动。我们检验了这样一个假设:在热环境中,冷却方式可减轻愈合良好的烧伤成人在体育活动期间的核心体温升高和热应激感知。
无烧伤(未烧伤)、体表面积烧伤20%-40%(中度烧伤)和体表面积烧伤>40%(大面积烧伤)的成年人在两种环境条件(30°C和39°C,相对湿度40%)下分四次进行1小时的中等强度运动(速度2.5±0.2英里/小时,坡度2%)。在每种环境条件下,每次就诊时随机分配应用以下一种冷却方式:无冷却(对照)、4米/秒风速的风扇(风扇)、每5分钟喷水一次(喷水;根据烧伤面积大小调整)或喷水+风扇组合。
在30°C时,未烧伤和中度烧伤组采用喷水+风扇时感知应变指数(PeSI)降低,而大面积烧伤组所有冷却方式均使PeSI降低。冷却方式未影响核心体温反应。在39°C环境中,仅大面积烧伤组喷水和喷水+风扇可减轻核心体温升高(P≤0.007)。在中度烧伤组,喷水+风扇使PeSI降低(P=0.017)。在大面积烧伤组,单独喷水和喷水+风扇均降低了PeSI(P≤0.041)。
对于各烧伤组的两种环境,相对于热应变指标(如核心体温),所应用的冷却方式在降低感知应变指标方面通常更有效。