Agaoglu Esra, Yılmaz Karaman Imran Gokcen, Kacar Cennet Yastıbas, Erdogan Hilal Kaya, Mutlu Talha, Karadag Ayse Serap
Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Dec;23(12):4094-4101. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16589. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
Oral isotretinoin is the most effective systemic treatment for acne patients who fail to respond to other forms of therapies. However, hesitations and concerns regarding its side effect profile may detain the patients from treatment. This study aimed to develop and validate the Isotretinoin Hesitancy Scale (IHS) among acne patients.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 100 acne patients who had not used isotretinoin previously. A 22-item scale was created based on the related literature and expert opinions. The items of the scale related to beliefs and worries about isotretinoin were formatted with response options: agree, indecisive, and disagree. In this study, construct validity was tested with exploratory factor analysis, and reliability was tested with internal consistency and split-half reliability.
The results of exploratory factor analysis indicated a three-factor solution with a total of 14 items, explaining 57% of the total variance. The first factor (Hesitancy Related to Reversible Adverse Effects: 6 items) accounted for 30% of the variance, the second factor (Hesitancy Related to Irreversible Adverse Effects: 4 items) accounted for 16% of the variance and the third factor (Isotretinoin-related Anxiety: 4 items) accounted 11% of the variance. The internal consistency of the three factors was calculated as 0.79, 0.78, and 0.72, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha score of the total scale was found to be 0.81, and split-half reliability was found to be 0.87.
The IHS is the first scale that provides a valid and reliable assessment of isotretinoin hesitancy in acne patients. Eliminating isotretinoin hesitancy may reduce acne-related clinical and psychosocial consequences.
口服异维A酸是对其他治疗方式无反应的痤疮患者最有效的全身治疗方法。然而,对其副作用的犹豫和担忧可能会使患者推迟治疗。本研究旨在开发并验证痤疮患者的异维A酸犹豫量表(IHS)。
对100名未曾使用过异维A酸的痤疮患者进行了一项横断面研究。基于相关文献和专家意见创建了一个包含22个条目的量表。该量表中与异维A酸信念和担忧相关的条目采用以下回答选项:同意、犹豫不决、不同意。在本研究中,通过探索性因素分析检验结构效度,通过内部一致性和分半信度检验信度。
探索性因素分析结果表明存在一个三因素结构,共14个条目,解释了总方差的57%。第一个因素(与可逆性不良反应相关的犹豫:6个条目)占方差的30%,第二个因素(与不可逆性不良反应相关的犹豫:4个条目)占方差的16%,第三个因素(与异维A酸相关的焦虑:4个条目)占方差的11%。三个因素的内部一致性分别计算为0.79、0.78和0.72。总量表的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.81,分半信度为0.87。
IHS是首个能有效且可靠地评估痤疮患者异维A酸犹豫情况的量表。消除异维A酸犹豫可能会减少与痤疮相关的临床和心理社会后果。