• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络安全攻击对人类在自动驾驶汽车运营中的信任的影响。

The Impact of Cybersecurity Attacks on Human Trust in Autonomous Vehicle Operations.

作者信息

Lim Cherin, Prendez David, Boyle Linda Ng, Rajivan Prashanth

机构信息

University of Washington, USA.

New York University, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2025 May;67(5):485-502. doi: 10.1177/00187208241283321. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1177/00187208241283321
PMID:39293023
Abstract

ObjectiveThis study examines the extent to which cybersecurity attacks on autonomous vehicles (AVs) affect human trust dynamics and driver behavior.BackgroundHuman trust is critical for the adoption and continued use of AVs. A pressing concern in this context is the persistent threat of cyberattacks, which pose a formidable threat to the secure operations of AVs and consequently, human trust.MethodA driving simulator experiment was conducted with 40 participants who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) Experience and Feedback and (2) Experience-Only. All participants experienced three drives: Baseline, Attack, and Post-Attack Drive. The Attack Drive prevented participants from properly operating the vehicle in multiple incidences. Only the "Experience and Feedback" group received a security update in the Post-Attack drive, which was related to the mitigation of the vehicle's vulnerability. Trust and foot positions were recorded for each drive.ResultsFindings suggest that attacks on AVs significantly degrade human trust, and remains degraded even after an error-less drive. Providing an update about the mitigation of the vulnerability did not significantly affect trust repair.ConclusionTrust toward AVs should be analyzed as an emergent and dynamic construct that requires autonomous systems capable of calibrating trust after malicious attacks through appropriate experience and interaction design.ApplicationThe results of this study can be applied when building driver and situation-adaptive AI systems within AVs.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了对自动驾驶汽车(AV)的网络安全攻击在多大程度上影响人类信任动态和驾驶员行为。

背景

人类信任对于自动驾驶汽车的采用和持续使用至关重要。在这种情况下,一个紧迫的问题是网络攻击的持续威胁,这对自动驾驶汽车的安全运行以及人类信任构成了巨大威胁。

方法

对40名参与者进行了驾驶模拟器实验,他们被随机分配到两个组中的一组:(1)体验与反馈组和(2)仅体验组。所有参与者都经历了三次驾驶:基线驾驶、攻击驾驶和攻击后驾驶。攻击驾驶在多个情况下阻止参与者正常操作车辆。只有“体验与反馈”组在攻击后驾驶中收到了与减轻车辆漏洞相关的安全更新。记录每次驾驶的信任度和脚部位置。

结果

研究结果表明,对自动驾驶汽车的攻击会显著降低人类信任,即使在无错误驾驶后仍会持续降低。提供关于减轻漏洞的更新对信任修复没有显著影响。

结论

对自动驾驶汽车信任应作为一种新兴的动态结构来分析,这需要通过适当的体验和交互设计,使自主系统能够在遭受恶意攻击后校准信任。

应用

本研究结果可应用于在自动驾驶汽车中构建驾驶员和情境自适应人工智能系统时。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Cybersecurity Attacks on Human Trust in Autonomous Vehicle Operations.网络安全攻击对人类在自动驾驶汽车运营中的信任的影响。
Hum Factors. 2025 May;67(5):485-502. doi: 10.1177/00187208241283321. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style.激进驾驶还是保守驾驶?研究自动驾驶车辆交互类型和道路事件对驾驶员信任和偏好驾驶风格的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2166-2178. doi: 10.1177/00187208231181199. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
3
Cyber-attacks in the next-generation cars, mitigation techniques, anticipated readiness and future directions.下一代汽车中的网络攻击、缓解技术、预期就绪情况和未来方向。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105837. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105837. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
4
Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.促进驾驶员对自动驾驶风格的信任:驾驶员对自动驾驶动作感知的作用。
Hum Factors. 2024 Jul;66(7):1961-1976. doi: 10.1177/00187208231189661. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
Group trust dynamics during a risky driving experience in a Tesla Model X.特斯拉Model X危险驾驶体验中的群体信任动态
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1129369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129369. eCollection 2023.
6
Transporting Children in Autonomous Vehicles: An Exploratory Study.自动驾驶车辆中的儿童运输:探索性研究。
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):278-287. doi: 10.1177/0018720819853993. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.引言很重要:操纵对自动化的信任和对自动驾驶的依赖。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jan;66:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
8
The impact of vision loss on attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: A vision-centric analysis.视力丧失对自动驾驶汽车态度的影响:以视觉为中心的分析。
Optom Vis Sci. 2024 Jun 1;101(6):424-434. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002145.
9
How should human-driven and autonomous vehicles behave at a zebra crossing? Determining acceptable stopping distances and setting-off times.在斑马线上,有人驾驶和自动驾驶车辆应该如何行驶?确定可接受的停车距离和出发时间。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Dec;208:107783. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107783. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
10
Effect of Takeover Request Time and Warning Modality on Trust in L3 Automated Driving.接管请求时间和警告方式对三级自动驾驶信任度的影响。
Hum Factors. 2025 May;67(5):427-444. doi: 10.1177/00187208241278433. Epub 2024 Aug 30.