Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Museum of Natural History, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Sci Adv. 2024 Sep 20;10(38):eado9774. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado9774.
Among the most widely used methods for understanding human-horse relationships in the archaeological record is the identification of human skeletal pathologies associated with mounted horseback riding. In particular, archaeologists encountering specific bony changes to the hip, femur, and lower back often assert a causal link between these features and prolonged periods of mounted horseback riding. The identification of these features have recently been used to assert the early practice of mounted horseback riding among the Yamnaya culture of western Eurasia during the third and fourth millennium BCE. Here, we summarize the methodological hurdles and analytical risks of using this approach in the absence of valid comparative datasets and outline best practices for using human osteological data in the study of ancient animal transport.
在考古记录中理解人类与马之间关系的最广泛应用方法中,有一种方法是识别与骑马有关的人类骨骼病理学。特别是,考古学家在髋部、股骨和下背部发现特定的骨骼变化时,往往会断言这些特征与长时间骑马之间存在因果关系。这些特征的识别最近被用于断言公元前三千年至四千年间,欧亚大陆西部的扬马纳亚文化中已经开始早期骑马。在这里,我们总结了在缺乏有效比较数据集的情况下使用这种方法的方法学障碍和分析风险,并概述了在研究古代动物运输时使用人类骨骼数据的最佳实践。