• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“你应该直接处理它”:医疗保健工作中管理互动问题的理想和意识形态。

"You should have addressed it directly": the ideals and ideologies of managing interaction problems in healthcare work.

机构信息

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Sep 2;38(9):313-328. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2024-0006.

DOI:10.1108/JHOM-01-2024-0006
PMID:39308087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406228/
Abstract

PURPOSE

An "open communication culture" in the workplace is considered a key contributor to high-quality interaction and providing means to address problems at work. We study how the ideals of "open communication" operate in healthcare.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We use discourse analysis to investigate the audio-recorded data from 14 workshop team discussions in older people services.

FINDINGS

We found four imperatives concerning the interactional conduct of their colleagues in problematic situations that nursing professionals prefer: (1) Engage in direct communication and avoid making assumptions, (2) Address problems immediately, (3) Deal directly with the person involved in the matter and (4) Summon the courage to speak up. Through these imperatives, the nursing professionals invoke and draw upon the "open communication" discourse. Although these ideals were acknowledged as difficult to realize in practice and as leading to experiences of frustration, the need to comply with them was constructed as beyond doubt.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Workplace communication should be enhanced at a communal level, allowing those with less power to express their perspectives on shaping shared ideals of workplace interaction.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The expectation that an individual will simply "speak up" when they experience mistreatment by a colleague might be too much if the individual is already in a precarious position.

摘要

目的

职场中的“开放沟通文化”被认为是促进高质量互动和解决工作问题的关键因素。我们研究“开放沟通”的理念在医疗保健中的运作方式。

设计/方法/途径:我们使用话语分析来研究老年人服务中 14 个工作坊团队讨论的录音数据。

发现

我们发现,在有问题的情况下,护理专业人员更喜欢同事在互动中的四种强制性做法:(1)进行直接沟通,避免臆测,(2)立即解决问题,(3)直接与涉及问题的人打交道,(4)鼓起勇气直言不讳。通过这些强制性做法,护理专业人员援引并借鉴了“开放沟通”话语。尽管这些理想在实践中被认为难以实现,并导致挫败感,但遵守这些理想的必要性被认为是毫无疑问的。

实际影响

应该在社区层面加强工作场所沟通,让那些权力较小的人能够表达他们对塑造共同工作场所互动理想的看法。

原创性/价值:如果个人已经处于不稳定的境地,那么期望个人在受到同事的虐待时简单地“直言不讳”可能是不切实际的。

相似文献

1
"You should have addressed it directly": the ideals and ideologies of managing interaction problems in healthcare work.“你应该直接处理它”:医疗保健工作中管理互动问题的理想和意识形态。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Sep 2;38(9):313-328. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2024-0006.
2
Verbatim Theater: Prompting Reflection and Discussion about Healthcare Culture as a Means of Promoting Culture Change.直译戏剧:作为促进文化变革手段的医疗保健文化反思与讨论的启发。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(5):531-540. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1768099. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Speaking up, being heard: registered nurses' perceptions of workplace communication.直言不讳,被倾听:注册护士对工作场所沟通的看法。
J Nurs Manag. 2012 Apr;20(3):361-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01296.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
What makes your day? A study of the quality of worklife of OR nurses.是什么成就了你的一天?一项关于手术室护士工作生活质量的研究。
Can Oper Room Nurs J. 1999 Dec;17(4):17-27.
5
The work performed through interprofessional meeting discourse: an observational study.通过跨专业会议话语开展的工作:一项观察性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2024 Jul-Aug;38(4):652-663. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2024.2343833. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
6
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
7
Whistle-blowing and workplace culture in older peoples' care: qualitative insights from the healthcare and social care workforce.老年人护理中的举报行为与工作场所文化:来自医疗保健和社会护理工作者的定性见解
Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Sep;36(7):986-1002. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12137. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
8
High-performing and low-performing nursing homes: a view from complexity science.高绩效与低绩效养老院:复杂性科学视角
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Oct-Dec;32(4):341-51. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296789.39128.f6.
9
Mobbing in the workplace by peers and managers: mobbing experienced by nurses working in healthcare facilities in Turkey and its effect on nurses.同事和管理者在工作场所的欺凌行为:土耳其医疗机构中护士所经历的欺凌行为及其对护士的影响
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Aug;16(8):1444-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01814.x.
10
Women Surgeons' Experiences of Interprofessional Workplace Conflict.女性外科医生的跨专业工作场所冲突体验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19843.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-development of client involvement in health and social care services: examining modes of interaction.共同制定卫生和社会保健服务中的客户参与模式:审视互动模式。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Feb 12;38(9):19-35. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2022-0310.
2
Defining Speaking Up in the Healthcare System: a Systematic Review.定义医疗体系中的发声行为:系统综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(15):3406-3413. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08322-0. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
3
Accountability and interactional inequality: the management of problems of interaction as a matter of cultural ideals and ideologies.问责制与互动不平等:将互动问题的管理视为文化理想和意识形态问题
Front Sociol. 2023 Jun 19;8:1204086. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1204086. eCollection 2023.
4
An integrative systematic review of employee silence and voice in healthcare: what are we really measuring?医疗保健领域员工沉默与表达的综合系统评价:我们究竟在衡量什么?
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 25;14:1111579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1111579. eCollection 2023.
5
Working together, thinking differently? HRM practices and trust in the health care context.共同合作,另辟蹊径?医疗保健背景下的人力资源管理实践与信任。
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Aug 24;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-05-2021-0186.
6
Stress-Buffering and Health-Protective Effect of Job Autonomy, Good Working Climate, and Social Support at Work Among Health Care Workers in Switzerland.瑞士医护人员工作自主性、良好工作氛围和社会支持的压力缓冲和健康保护作用。
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Dec 1;63(12):e918-e924. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002404.
7
Exploring the factors that promote or diminish a psychologically safe environment: a qualitative interview study with critical care staff.探讨促进或削弱心理安全环境的因素:一项对重症监护工作人员的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 4;11(8):e046699. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046699.
8
Nursing practice environment and employee silence about patient safety: The mediating role of professional discrimination experienced by nurses.护理实践环境与护士对患者安全的沉默:护士所经历的职业歧视的中介作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Feb;78(2):434-445. doi: 10.1111/jan.14994. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
9
Discussing teamwork in health care: from interprofessional collaboration to coordination and cooperation.探讨医疗保健中的团队合作:从跨专业协作到协调与合作。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Dec;36(4):367-371. doi: 10.1111/hir.12282.
10
Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital.跨专业团队成员的满意度:智利一家医院的混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z.