• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Ethical boundary decisions in intensive care medicine].[重症监护医学中的伦理边界决策]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;65(10):967-975. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
2
Exploring Ethical Dimensions in Neuropalliative Care.探索神经姑息治疗中的伦理维度。
Semin Neurol. 2024 Oct;44(5):534-542. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787775. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Ethical issues in surgical palliative care: am I killing the patient by "letting him go"?外科姑息治疗中的伦理问题:我“让患者离去”是在杀害患者吗?
Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Apr;85(2):273-86, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2004.11.006.
4
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.尊重患有慢性精神疾病的女性在避孕决策方面的自主权。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;44(7):671-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.7.671.
5
Ethics.伦理学
Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1996 Oct;5(3):673-84.
6
Prioritising 'already-scarce' intensive care unit resources in the midst of COVID-19: a call for regional triage committees in South Africa.在新冠疫情期间优先分配“本就稀缺的”重症监护病房资源:呼吁南非成立地区分诊委员会。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00596-5.
7
[Key ethic discussions in hospice/palliative care].[临终关怀/姑息治疗中的关键伦理讨论]
Acta Med Croatica. 2008 Dec;62(5):447-54.
8
Ethical issues in neurocritical care.神经危重症监护中的伦理问题。
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2022 Jan-Feb;178(1-2):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.12.006. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
9
[Between patient autonomy and the ethics of care : difficult end-of-life decision-making in intensive care].[患者自主权与关怀伦理之间:重症监护中艰难的临终决策]
Anaesthesist. 2012 Jun;61(6):521-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-012-2017-1.
10
[End-of-life decisions and practices in critically ill patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. A nationwide survey].[心脏重症监护病房危重症患者的临终决策与实践。一项全国性调查]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2016 Mar;111(2):92-7. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0045-8. Epub 2015 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognosticating the outcome of intensive care in older patients-a narrative review.预测老年患者重症监护的结果——一项叙述性综述。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Jun 22;14(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01330-1.
2
Frailty, Outcomes, Recovery and Care Steps of Critically Ill Patients (FORECAST): a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study.危重症患者脆弱性、结局、恢复和护理步骤预测研究(FORECAST):一项前瞻性、多中心、队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jul;50(7):1064-1074. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07404-9. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Real-time machine learning model to predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients: development and international validation.实时机器学习模型预测危重症患者短期死亡率:开发和国际验证。
Crit Care. 2024 Mar 14;28(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04866-7.
4
[Time-limited trials (TLT) in the intensive care unit : Recommendations from the ethics section of the DIVI and the ethics section of the DGIIN].[重症监护病房的限时试验(TLT):德国重症与急诊医学学会伦理委员会及德国重症医学与重症护理学会伦理委员会的建议]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 May;119(4):291-295. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01112-4. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
5
Palliative care in intensive care.重症监护中的姑息治疗。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Dec;49(12):1538-1540. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07260-z. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Key Factors in Decision Making for ECLS: A Binational Factorial Survey.体外膜肺氧合决策的关键因素:一项中德因素调查
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):313-325. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211040815. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
7
[Overtreatment in intensive care medicine-recognition, designation, and avoidance : Position paper of the Ethics Section of the DIVI and the Ethics section of the DGIIN].[重症医学中的过度治疗——识别、界定与避免:德国重症与急救医学协会伦理委员会及德国重症监护与感染病学会伦理委员会立场文件]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2021 May;116(4):281-294. doi: 10.1007/s00063-021-00794-4. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Pandemic ICU triage challenge and medical ethics.大流行期间的 ICU 分诊挑战与医学伦理。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Jun;11(2):133-137. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002793. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
Elderly Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中的老年患者
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb;42(1):10-19. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710571. Epub 2020 Aug 9.

[重症监护医学中的伦理边界决策]

[Ethical boundary decisions in intensive care medicine].

作者信息

Scherr Benedikt Florian, Buehler Philipp Karl

机构信息

Zentrum für Intensivmedizin, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401, Winterthur, Schweiz.

University of Zurich, Zürich, Schweiz.

出版信息

Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;65(10):967-975. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00108-024-01781-5
PMID:39311946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11452514/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ethical decision-making is a cornerstone of intensive care and emergency medicine. In acute scenarios, clinicians often face rapid, high-stakes decisions concerning life and death, made more challenging by time constraints and incomplete information. These decisions are further complicated by economic constraints, limited resources, and evolving technological capabilities.

QUESTION

What decision-making aids and factors can be employed in ethical borderline cases within intensive care medicine?

RESULTS

Fundamental ethical principles such as patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice form the basis for medical treatment decisions. Evaluating the patient's will through advanced directives or proxy consensus is crucial, although advanced directives can be ambiguous. Assessing quality of life is increasingly important, with instruments such as the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) being utilized. For older patients, a holistic approach is recommended, focusing on overall health rather than chronological age. In patients with advanced underlying diseases, a multidisciplinary dialogue is essential.

DISCUSSION

Decision-making in intensive care medicine requires careful consideration of medical, ethical, and individual factors. Despite advances in artificial intelligence and prognostic models, human judgment remains crucial. During periods of resource scarcity, ethically sound triage protocols are required. The challenge lies in applying these principles and factors in clinical practice while respecting the individuality of each patient.

摘要

背景

伦理决策是重症监护和急诊医学的基石。在急性情况下,临床医生经常面临有关生死的快速、高风险决策,时间限制和信息不完整使这些决策更具挑战性。经济限制、资源有限和技术能力不断发展进一步加剧了这些决策的复杂性。

问题

在重症监护医学的伦理边缘案例中可以采用哪些决策辅助工具和因素?

结果

诸如患者自主权、行善、不伤害和公正等基本伦理原则构成了医疗决策的基础。通过预先指示或代理人共识评估患者的意愿至关重要,尽管预先指示可能含糊不清。评估生活质量变得越来越重要,诸如临床衰弱量表(CFS)等工具正在得到应用。对于老年患者,建议采用整体方法,关注整体健康而非实际年龄。对于患有晚期基础疾病的患者,多学科对话至关重要。

讨论

重症监护医学中的决策需要仔细考虑医学、伦理和个体因素。尽管人工智能和预后模型取得了进展,但人类判断仍然至关重要。在资源稀缺时期,需要符合伦理的分诊方案。挑战在于在临床实践中应用这些原则和因素的同时尊重每个患者的个性。