• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对多个领域的目标患者群体优化个性化治疗。

Optimizing personalized treatments for targeted patient populations across multiple domains.

作者信息

Chen Yuan, Zeng Donglin, Wang Yuanjia

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 5803 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , 633 3rd Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Int J Biostat. 2024 Sep 26;20(2):437-453. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2024-0068. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1515/ijb-2024-0068
PMID:39322995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11661560/
Abstract

Learning individualized treatment rules (ITRs) for a target patient population with mental disorders is confronted with many challenges. First, the target population may be different from the training population that provided data for learning ITRs. Ignoring differences between the training patient data and the target population can result in sub-optimal treatment strategies for the target population. Second, for mental disorders, a patient's underlying mental state is not observed but can be inferred from measures of high-dimensional combinations of symptomatology. Treatment mechanisms are unknown and can be complex, and thus treatment effect moderation can take complicated forms. To address these challenges, we propose a novel method that connects measurement models, efficient weighting schemes, and flexible neural network architecture through latent variables to tailor treatments for a target population. Patients' underlying mental states are represented by a compact set of latent state variables while preserving interpretability. Weighting schemes are designed based on lower-dimensional latent variables to efficiently balance population differences so that biases in learning the latent structure and treatment effects are mitigated. Extensive simulation studies demonstrated consistent superiority of the proposed method and the weighting approach. Applications to two real-world studies of patients with major depressive disorder have shown a broad utility of the proposed method in improving treatment outcomes in the target population.

摘要

为患有精神障碍的目标患者群体学习个性化治疗规则(ITRs)面临诸多挑战。首先,目标人群可能与为学习ITRs提供数据的训练人群不同。忽视训练患者数据与目标人群之间的差异可能导致针对目标人群的次优治疗策略。其次,对于精神障碍,患者的潜在心理状态无法直接观察到,但可以从症状学的高维组合测量中推断出来。治疗机制未知且可能很复杂,因此治疗效果调节可能呈现复杂的形式。为应对这些挑战,我们提出了一种新颖的方法,该方法通过潜在变量将测量模型、高效加权方案和灵活的神经网络架构连接起来,为目标人群量身定制治疗方案。患者的潜在心理状态由一组紧凑的潜在状态变量表示,同时保持可解释性。基于低维潜在变量设计加权方案,以有效平衡人群差异,从而减轻学习潜在结构和治疗效果时的偏差。广泛的模拟研究证明了所提出方法和加权方法始终具有优越性。将其应用于两项针对重度抑郁症患者的真实世界研究表明,该方法在改善目标人群的治疗结果方面具有广泛的实用性。

相似文献

1
Optimizing personalized treatments for targeted patient populations across multiple domains.针对多个领域的目标患者群体优化个性化治疗。
Int J Biostat. 2024 Sep 26;20(2):437-453. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2024-0068. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.
2
Learning Individualized Treatment Rules for Multiple-Domain Latent Outcomes.学习多领域潜在结果的个性化治疗规则。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(533):269-282. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1817751. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
Representation Learning for Integrating Multi-domain Outcomes to Optimize Individualized Treatments.用于整合多领域结果以优化个性化治疗的表征学习
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020 Dec;33:17976-17986.
4
Transfer learning of individualized treatment rules from experimental to real-world data.将个性化治疗规则从实验数据转移到真实世界数据的迁移学习。
J Comput Graph Stat. 2023;32(3):1036-1045. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2141752. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Integrating plasticity into precision psychiatry.将可塑性融入精准精神病学。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 12;68(1):e54. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.19.
6
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
7
Matched Learning for Optimizing Individualized Treatment Strategies Using Electronic Health Records.利用电子健康记录进行匹配学习以优化个性化治疗策略
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(529):380-392. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1549050. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
Composite interaction tree for simultaneous learning of optimal individualized treatment rules and subgroups.用于同时学习最优个体化治疗规则和亚组的组合交互树。
Stat Med. 2019 Jun 30;38(14):2632-2651. doi: 10.1002/sim.8105. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
Learning Personalized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Records Using Topic Modeling Feature Extraction.利用主题建模特征提取从电子健康记录中学习个性化治疗规则。
Proc Int Conf Data Sci Adv Anal. 2019 Oct;2019:392-402. doi: 10.1109/dsaa.2019.00054. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
Multiple domain and multiple kernel outcome-weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment regimes.用于估计个体化治疗方案的多域多核结果加权学习
J Comput Graph Stat. 2022;31(4):1375-1383. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2067552. Epub 2022 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Embedding Learning.嵌入学习
J Am Stat Assoc. 2022;117(537):307-319. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1775614. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
2
Learning Individualized Treatment Rules for Multiple-Domain Latent Outcomes.学习多领域潜在结果的个性化治疗规则。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(533):269-282. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1817751. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
Learning Optimal Distributionally Robust Individualized Treatment Rules.学习最优分布鲁棒个体化治疗规则。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(534):659-674. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1796359. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
Extending inferences from a randomized trial to a new target population.将随机试验的推断扩展到新的目标人群。
Stat Med. 2020 Jun 30;39(14):1999-2014. doi: 10.1002/sim.8426. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
Robustifying Trial-Derived Optimal Treatment Rules for A Target Population.强化针对目标人群的试验衍生最优治疗规则
Electron J Stat. 2019;13(1):1717-1743. doi: 10.1214/19-EJS1540. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Deep advantage learning for optimal dynamic treatment regime.用于优化动态治疗方案的深度优势学习
Stat Theory Relat Fields. 2018;2(1):80-88. doi: 10.1080/24754269.2018.1466096. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Bagging and deep learning in optimal individualized treatment rules.最优个体化治疗规则中的装袋法与深度学习
Biometrics. 2019 Jun;75(2):674-684. doi: 10.1111/biom.12990. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Augmented outcome-weighted learning for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimens.增强型结果加权学习估计最优动态治疗方案。
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 20;37(26):3776-3788. doi: 10.1002/sim.7844. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Etiology in psychiatry: embracing the reality of poly-gene-environmental causation of mental illness.精神病学的病因学:接受精神疾病多基因-环境因果关系的现实。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):121-129. doi: 10.1002/wps.20436.
10
Reevaluating the Efficacy and Predictability of Antidepressant Treatments: A Symptom Clustering Approach.重新评估抗抑郁治疗的疗效和可预测性:一种症状聚类方法。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;74(4):370-378. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0025.