Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Sep 6;5(9):e243128. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3128.
IMPORTANCE: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the treatment of choice for symptoms of menopause. However, its adoption is hindered by the risk-benefit trade-off in relation to acute and chronic diseases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in and correlates of MHT use among postmenopausal women in the US from 1999 to March 2020. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This serial cross-sectional analysis of MHT use used data from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants included noninstitutionalized US postmenopausal women from 10 NHANES study cycles (1999-2000 to 2017-March 2020 [pre-COVID-19 pandemic]). Data were analyzed from December 2023 to April 2024. EXPOSURES: NHANES study cycle. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of MHT use was extracted from the prescription medication data collected during NHANES household interviews. MHT formulations were determined by hormone type. RESULTS: Data on 13 048 US postmenopausal women (47.1% ≥65 years old) were analyzed. From 1999 to 2020, the prevalence of MHT use decreased among women of all age groups, from 26.9% (95% CI, 22.6%-31.7%) in 1999 to 4.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-6.5%) in 2020. Until 2002, MHT use was highest among women aged 52 to 65 years, but since 2005, MHT use has been highest among women younger than 52 years. MHT use decreased by 23.5% (95% CI, 11.4%-35.6%), 31.4% (95% CI, 23.4%-39.5%), and 10.6% (95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%) for women younger than 52 years, 52 years to younger than 65 years, and 65 years and older, respectively. Prevalence of MHT use decreased from 13.8% (95% CI, 8.5%-21.7%) to 2.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.6%) for Hispanic women, 11.9% (95% CI, 8.5%-16.3%) to 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.1%) for non-Hispanic Black women, and 31.4% (95% CI, 27.1%-36.1%) to 5.8% (95% CI, 4.1%-8.2%) for non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic White women consistently had the highest prevalence of MHT use. Estrogen-only formulation accounted for more than 50% of the MHT for most study periods. The prevalence of MHT use varied by family income-to-poverty ratio, health insurance coverage in all racial and ethnic groups, weight, and smoking status among non-Hispanic White women, as well as by education attainment among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this cross-sectional study show that over the past 2 decades, MHT use declined among US postmenopausal women of all age and racial and ethnic groups. Women of racial and ethnic minority groups had lower prevalence of MHT use compared to non-Hispanic White women.
重要性:绝经激素治疗 (MHT) 是治疗绝经相关症状的首选方法。然而,由于急性和慢性疾病的风险效益权衡,其应用受到了阻碍。
目的:评估 1999 年至 2020 年 3 月期间美国绝经后女性中 MHT 使用的趋势及其相关因素。
设计、地点和参与者:这项 MHT 使用的连续横断面分析使用了来自全国代表性的国家健康和营养调查 (NHANES) 的数据。参与者包括来自 10 个 NHANES 研究周期(1999-2000 年至 2017 年 3 月[COVID-19 大流行前])的非机构化美国绝经后女性。数据于 2023 年 12 月至 2024 年 4 月进行分析。
暴露:NHANES 研究周期。
主要结局和测量:从 NHANES 家庭访谈中收集的处方药物数据中提取 MHT 使用的流行率。通过激素类型确定 MHT 制剂。
结果:分析了 13048 名美国绝经后妇女(≥65 岁者占 47.1%)的数据。从 1999 年到 2020 年,所有年龄组的 MHT 使用率都有所下降,从 1999 年的 26.9%(95%CI,22.6%-31.7%)降至 2020 年的 4.7%(95%CI,3.4%-6.5%)。直到 2002 年,52 至 65 岁的女性中 MHT 使用率最高,但自 2005 年以来,52 岁以下的女性中 MHT 使用率最高。52 岁以下、52 至 65 岁和 65 岁及以上的女性 MHT 使用分别下降了 23.5%(95%CI,11.4%-35.6%)、31.4%(95%CI,23.4%-39.5%)和 10.6%(95%CI,6.3%-14.8%)。MHT 使用率从 13.8%(95%CI,8.5%-21.7%)降至 2.6%(95%CI,1.5%-4.6%),用于西班牙裔女性,从 11.9%(95%CI,8.5%-16.3%)降至 0.5%(95%CI,0.2%-1.1%),用于非西班牙裔黑人女性,以及从 31.4%(95%CI,27.1%-36.1%)降至 5.8%(95%CI,4.1%-8.2%),用于非西班牙裔白人女性。非西班牙裔白人女性的 MHT 使用率始终最高。雌激素单一制剂在大多数研究期间占 MHT 的比例超过 50%。在非西班牙裔白人女性中,MHT 使用率因家庭收入与贫困比率、所有种族和民族群体的医疗保险覆盖范围、体重和吸烟状况而有所不同,而非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔女性的 MHT 使用率因教育程度而异。
结论和相关性:这项横断面研究的结果表明,在过去 20 年中,美国绝经后女性中 MHT 的使用率有所下降。与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,少数族裔女性的 MHT 使用率较低。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024-9-6
JAMA Dermatol. 2021-8-1
BMC Womens Health. 2007-10-18
Front Reprod Health. 2025-8-11
BMC Public Health. 2025-5-13
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025-3-3
Mayo Clin Proc. 2023-6
Circulation. 2023-2-14
JAMA. 2023-2-7