• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计用于数据共享:在数据管理和传播中推进健康公平性的考虑因素。

Designing for data sharing: Considerations for advancing health equity in data management and dissemination.

机构信息

Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2024 Nov 16;14(11):637-642. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae049.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibae049
PMID:39331485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11568841/
Abstract

Data sharing, the act of making scientific research data available to others, can accelerate innovation and discoveries, and ultimately enhance public health. The National Cancer Institute Implementation Science Centers in Cancer Control convened a diverse group of research scientists, practitioners, and community partners in three interactive workshops (May-June 2022) to identify and discuss factors that must be considered when designing research for equitable data sharing with a specific emphasis on implementation science and social, behavioral, and population health research. This group identified and operationalized a set of seven key considerations for equitable data sharing-conceptualized as an inclusive process that fairly includes the perspectives and priorities of all partners involved in and impacted by data sharing, with consideration of ethics, history, and benefits-that were integrated into a framework. Key data-sharing components particularly important for health equity included: elevating data sharing into a core research activity, incorporating diverse perspectives, and meaningfully engaging partners in data-sharing decisions throughout the project lifecycle. As the process of data sharing grows in research, it is critical to continue considering the potential positive and adverse impact of data sharing on diverse beneficiaries of health data and research.

摘要

数据共享是将科学研究数据提供给他人的行为,它可以加速创新和发现,最终增进公共健康。国家癌症研究所癌症控制实施科学中心召集了一组多元化的研究科学家、实践者和社区合作伙伴,在三个互动研讨会上(2022 年 5 月至 6 月),确定并讨论了在设计公平的数据共享研究时必须考虑的因素,特别强调实施科学和社会、行为和人口健康研究。该小组确定并实施了一套公平数据共享的七个关键考虑因素——将其概念化为一个包容性的过程,公平地包括所有参与和受数据共享影响的合作伙伴的观点和优先事项,并考虑到伦理、历史和利益——这些因素被整合到一个框架中。对健康公平特别重要的数据共享组成部分包括:将数据共享提升为核心研究活动,纳入多元化的观点,并在整个项目生命周期中,有意义地让合作伙伴参与数据共享决策。随着数据共享在研究中的不断发展,必须继续考虑数据共享对健康数据和研究的不同受益人的潜在积极和不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/11568841/c8d2c4526ef0/ibae049_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/11568841/c8d2c4526ef0/ibae049_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fd/11568841/c8d2c4526ef0/ibae049_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing for data sharing: Considerations for advancing health equity in data management and dissemination.设计用于数据共享:在数据管理和传播中推进健康公平性的考虑因素。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Nov 16;14(11):637-642. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae049.
2
Enhancing Impact: A Call to Action for Equitable Implementation Science.增强影响力:呼吁公平实施科学。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):174-189. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01589-z. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
4
Leveraging an implementation science partnership network to understand how Federally Qualified Health Centers operationalize and address health equity.利用实施科学伙伴关系网络了解联邦合格健康中心如何实施和解决公平问题。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):23-33. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad046.
5
Principles to operationalize equity in cancer research and health outcomes: lessons learned from the cancer prevention and control research network.将公平原则付诸癌症研究和健康结果的实践:从癌症预防和控制研究网络中吸取的经验教训。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Apr;34(4):371-387. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01668-0. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities in health services; diversity, equity, and inclusion; and implementation science.为社区主导的遗传性出血性疾病国家研究蓝图奠定基础:卫生服务中的研究重点;多样性、公平性和包容性;以及实施科学。
Expert Rev Hematol. 2023 Mar;16(sup1):87-106. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2183836.
7
Practitioner perspectives on equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and control.实践者对公平实施癌症预防和控制循证干预措施的看法。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Nov 16;14(11):643-652. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae048.
8
Integrating a focus on health equity in implementation science: Case examples from the national cancer institute's implementation science in cancer control centers (ISC) network.将对健康公平性的关注融入实施科学:来自美国国立癌症研究所癌症控制中心实施科学(ISC)网络的案例
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Sep 29;7(1):e226. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.638. eCollection 2023.
9
Leveraging Science to Advance Health Equity: Preliminary Considerations for Implementing Health Equity Science at State and Local Health Departments.利用科学促进健康公平:州和地方卫生部门实施健康公平科学的初步考量
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(4):467-478. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001956. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
10
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a method for qualitative data integration to advance implementation science within research consortia.开发一种定性数据整合方法,以推动研究联盟内部的实施科学发展。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Feb 25;6(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00701-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships.社区参与式研究伙伴关系中的数据共享。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;325:115895. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115895. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Data Sharing and the Growth of Medical Knowledge.数据共享与医学知识的增长
JAMA. 2022 Dec 27;328(24):2398-2399. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.22837.
3
Data sharing and community-engaged research.数据共享和社区参与式研究。
Science. 2022 Oct 14;378(6616):141-143. doi: 10.1126/science.abq6851. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
4
Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals.可复制的全脑关联研究需要数千人参与。
Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7902):654-660. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers.美国定性数据共享的障碍和促进因素:定性研究人员的调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261719. eCollection 2021.
6
Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Data Governance in Health Research: A Systematic Review.原住民和部落民族在健康研究中的数据治理:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910318.
7
Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines.数据共享实践和根据请求提供数据的可用性因科学学科而异。
Sci Data. 2021 Jul 27;8(1):192. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0.
8
Engage for Equity: A Long-Term Study of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-Engaged Research Practices and Outcomes.参与公平:社区参与式研究和社区参与式研究实践与成果的长期研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):380-390. doi: 10.1177/1090198119897075.
9
Sharing Is Caring-Data Sharing Initiatives in Healthcare.共享即关爱——医疗保健领域的数据共享计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9):3046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093046.
10
Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms.国际卫生研究中负责任的数据共享:原则和规范的系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Mar 28;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0359-9.