Suppr超能文献

通过与ProRoot MTA和Biodentine比较评估Well-Root PT的生物相容性和生物活性潜力。

Evaluation of biocompatibility and bioactive potential of Well-Root PT by comparison with ProRoot MTA and Biodentine.

作者信息

Chae Yong Kwon, Ye Ju Ri, Nam Ok Hyung

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Dent Sci. 2024 Oct;19(4):2218-2225. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Well-Root PT is a novel bioceramic material developed to overcome limitations of conventional calcium silicate cements. The purpose of this study was to assess the biocompatibility and bioactivity of a premixed putty-type cement, Well-Root PT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Identical cylindrical samples were prepared from ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and Well-Root PT. calcium weight volume and calcium ion release from the materials were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy. An rat direct pulp capping model was implemented with the materials ( = 14 per material). The rats were sacrificed at 7 or 28 days. Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

calcium weight volume was 42.83 ± 8.82 % in ProRoot MTA, 47.05 ± 8.83 % in Biodentine, and 29.99 ± 4.94 % in Well-Root PT. Calcium ion releases from Well-Root PT after 7 and 28 days were similar with those from ProRoot MTA, but lower than those from Biodentine ( = 0.001 after 7 and 28 days equally). In an rat model, hematoxylin and eosin analysis showed no significant differences in inflammatory infiltration ( = 0.393) and hard tissue formation scores among the materials ( = 0.905). Also, both CD68 and DSPP expression showed similar results, with no significant differences among the materials (equally  = 0.874 for both markers).

CONCLUSION

Within the limits of this study, Well-Root PT was comparable to ProRoot MTA and Biodentine in terms of biocompatibility and bioactivity.

摘要

背景/目的:Well-Root PT是一种新型生物陶瓷材料,旨在克服传统硅酸钙水门汀的局限性。本研究的目的是评估预混糊剂型水门汀Well-Root PT的生物相容性和生物活性。

材料与方法

用ProRoot MTA、Biodentine和Well-Root PT制备相同的圆柱形样品。通过扫描电子显微镜、能量色散光谱和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱评估材料中的钙重量体积和钙离子释放情况。用这些材料建立大鼠直接盖髓模型(每种材料n = 14)。在7天或28天时处死大鼠。进行苏木精-伊红染色和免疫组织化学分析。

结果

ProRoot MTA中的钙重量体积为42.83 ± 8.82%,Biodentine中的为47.05 ± 8.83%,Well-Root PT中的为29.99 ± 4.94%。Well-Root PT在7天和28天后的钙离子释放与ProRoot MTA相似,但低于Biodentine(7天和28天后均P = 0.001)。在大鼠模型中,苏木精-伊红染色分析显示材料间炎症浸润(P = 0.393)和硬组织形成评分无显著差异(P = 0.905)。此外,CD68和DSPP表达结果相似,材料间无显著差异(两种标志物均P = 0.874)。

结论

在本研究范围内,Well-Root PT在生物相容性和生物活性方面与ProRoot MTA和Biodentine相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/339c/11437307/a31db6668a7c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验