• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

求变,而非守成!只有在变革规范而非现状规范的情况下,控制威胁后的规范从众行为才会出现。

To change, but not to preserve! Norm conformity following control threat only emerges for change norms but not for status quo norms.

作者信息

Stollberg Janine, Fritsche Immo, Jonas Eva

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Wilhelm Wundt Institute for Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Self Identity. 2024 Sep 12;23(5-6):484-504. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2024.2399869. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1080/15298868.2024.2399869
PMID:39355282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11441394/
Abstract

Collectively pursuing social change may help people experience a sense of agency through their group when personal control is threatened, thereby restoring their sense of control. Accordingly, we proposed and found in two studies ( = 177 & 178) that following an experimentally manipulated threat to personal control, group members conform only to ingroup norms (vs. non-norms) framed as proposing social change, but not to those framed as preserving the status quo (in Study 1, we found this only for highly identified group members). This demonstrates the importance of collectively pursued social change for group-based control processes and qualifies the widely held belief that people reject change under conditions of threat.

摘要

当个人控制权受到威胁时,共同追求社会变革可能会帮助人们通过其所在群体体验到一种能动感,从而恢复他们的控制感。因此,我们在两项研究(样本量分别为177人和178人)中提出并发现,在对个人控制权进行实验性操纵的威胁之后,群体成员只遵守被框定为提出社会变革的内群体规范(而非规范),而不遵守被框定为维持现状的规范(在研究1中,我们发现只有高度认同群体的成员才是如此)。这证明了共同追求社会变革对于基于群体的控制过程的重要性,并修正了人们普遍持有的一种观点,即人们在受到威胁的情况下会拒绝变革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8b/11441394/83de6133d5b6/PSAI_A_2399869_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8b/11441394/caae15365cfb/PSAI_A_2399869_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8b/11441394/83de6133d5b6/PSAI_A_2399869_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8b/11441394/caae15365cfb/PSAI_A_2399869_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8b/11441394/83de6133d5b6/PSAI_A_2399869_F0002_B.jpg

相似文献

1
To change, but not to preserve! Norm conformity following control threat only emerges for change norms but not for status quo norms.求变,而非守成!只有在变革规范而非现状规范的情况下,控制威胁后的规范从众行为才会出现。
Self Identity. 2024 Sep 12;23(5-6):484-504. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2024.2399869. eCollection 2024.
2
Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy.社会规范解释了气候政策的优先次序。
Clim Change. 2022;173(1-2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03396-x. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
Striving for group agency: threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups.追求群体能动性:对个人控制权的威胁增加了能动群体的吸引力。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 27;6:649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00649. eCollection 2015.
4
Group norms, intergroup resource allocation, and social reasoning among children and adolescents.儿童和青少年的群体规范、群体间资源分配和社会推理。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Dec;53(12):2333-2339. doi: 10.1037/dev0000392. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics.建模社会规范:规范效用方法与信念动态的整合。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230027. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0027. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
6
Why are they eco-friendly? Attributing eco-friendly descriptive norms to intrinsic motivation increases pro-environmental purchase intention.为什么它们是环保的?将环保描述性规范归因于内在动机可以提高有利于环境的购买意愿。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0265839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265839. eCollection 2022.
7
The Role of Indian Caste Identity and Caste Inconsistent Norms on Status Representation.印度种姓身份和种姓不一致规范在地位表征中的作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;8:487. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00487. eCollection 2017.
8
Neural mechanisms underlying social conformity in an ultimatum game.社会遵从性在最后通牒博弈中的神经机制。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 24;7:896. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00896. eCollection 2013.
9
Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation.年幼的儿童会根据违规者的群体归属有选择性地执行社会规范。
Cognition. 2012 Sep;124(3):325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
10
Social norms and identity relevance: a motivational approach to normative behavior.社会规范与身份相关性:规范行为的动机性方法
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Oct;30(10):1295-309. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264480.

本文引用的文献

1
Do Salient Social Norms Moderate Mortality Salience Effects? A (Challenging) Meta-Analysis of Terror Management Studies.显著的社会规范是否能调节死亡凸显效应?一项(具有挑战性的)死亡管理研究的元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2023 May;27(2):195-225. doi: 10.1177/10888683221107267. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change.系统正当化:实验证据、其情境本质及其对社会变革的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep 19. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12278.
3
Striving for group agency: threat to personal control increases the attractiveness of agentic groups.
追求群体能动性:对个人控制权的威胁增加了能动群体的吸引力。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 27;6:649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00649. eCollection 2015.
4
From "we" to "me": Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being.从“我们”到“我”:群体认同增强了感知到的个人控制感,并对健康和幸福产生影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jul;109(1):53-74. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000019. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world.补偿性控制与结构化世界的吸引力。
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):694-722. doi: 10.1037/a0038703. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
6
Seeking structure in social organization: compensatory control and the psychological advantages of hierarchy.在社会组织中寻求结构:补偿控制与等级制度的心理优势。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Apr;106(4):590-609. doi: 10.1037/a0035620. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
7
Reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religion.宗教的反应式方法动机(RAM)。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):148-61. doi: 10.1037/a0019702.
8
Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: the interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment.规范行为焦点理论与恐惧管理理论:死亡凸显性与规范凸显性对社会判断的交互影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Dec;95(6):1239-51. doi: 10.1037/a0013593.
9
The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense.控制动机在死亡凸显对群体内支持与防御的影响中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):524-41. doi: 10.1037/a0012666.
10
Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification.群体层面的自我定义与自我投入:内群体认同的层级(多成分)模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):144-65. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144.