• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合作开发新疗法:最大化健康和创新。

Collaboration for new therapies: maximizing health and innovation.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Universidad Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

Life Science Consultant, Faro, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;12:1383107. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1383107. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1383107
PMID:39363986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11446746/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Innovative medicines and vaccines can provide direct health benefits to patients and populations by preventing, treating and curing diseases, and also drive wider socioeconomic and productivity gains. However, researching and developing them is complex and risky. Funding for life sciences R&D has different sources: public, charitable/NGO, and private sector. We believe there is consensus that all are required, although there is less understanding about their respective roles, synergies, and funding priorities. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the current life sciences innovation ecosystem in Europe, highlighting challenges for funding and innovation of new therapies and our proposed options to address these.

METHODS

The basis of this paper stems from the reflections made by the co-authors during a webinar with title "Collaboration for new therapies: maximising funding and innovation," in March 2023, with further targeted literature reviews.

RESULTS

We identify eight challenges in the European life sciences ecosystem, some closely related, and nine options that we think might be helpful to address them. Each option on its own can have different levels of 'impact', but collectively will provide synergies among them, and thus maximize their impact.

DISCUSSION

It is critical to ascertain how the strengths of each actor can be leveraged to bring new medicines/treatments to market, quicker and more efficiently. We need a trusted environment, with strategic collaborations between the public and private sectors, and policy initiatives and incentives should be targeted to strengthen the infrastructure with the aim of fostering such optimal alliances.

摘要

简介

创新药物和疫苗可以通过预防、治疗和治愈疾病为患者和人群带来直接的健康益处,同时也能带来更广泛的社会经济和生产力收益。然而,研发创新药物和疫苗非常复杂且具有风险。生命科学研发的资金有不同的来源:公共、慈善/非政府组织和私营部门。我们相信,人们普遍认为所有这些来源都必不可少,尽管对于它们各自的作用、协同作用和资金优先级的理解较少。本文的目的是概述欧洲当前的生命科学创新生态系统,强调新疗法的资金和创新面临的挑战,并提出我们解决这些挑战的建议。

方法

本文的基础源于合著者在 2023 年 3 月以“新疗法的合作:最大化资金和创新”为标题的网络研讨会上的思考,以及进一步有针对性的文献综述。

结果

我们确定了欧洲生命科学生态系统中的八个挑战,其中一些挑战密切相关,并提出了我们认为有助于解决这些挑战的九个选项。每个选项本身都可以具有不同程度的“影响”,但它们共同作用将产生协同效应,从而最大限度地发挥其影响。

讨论

确定如何利用每个参与者的优势将新药/疗法更快、更有效地推向市场至关重要。我们需要一个有信任的环境,公共和私营部门之间进行战略性合作,政策举措和激励措施应针对加强基础设施,以促进这种最佳联盟。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f7/11446746/80caaa15961b/fpubh-12-1383107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f7/11446746/80caaa15961b/fpubh-12-1383107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f7/11446746/80caaa15961b/fpubh-12-1383107-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Collaboration for new therapies: maximizing health and innovation.合作开发新疗法:最大化健康和创新。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;12:1383107. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1383107. eCollection 2024.
2
Towards a European strategy for medicines research (2014-2020): The EUFEPS position paper on Horizon 2020.迈向欧洲药品研究战略(2014-2020 年):欧盟制药工业协会联合会关于“地平线 2020”计划的立场文件。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012 Dec 18;47(5):979-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.09.020. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
3
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
6
Innovation Partnership for a Roadmap on Vaccines in Europe (IPROVE): A vision for the vaccines of tomorrow.创新伙伴关系,以制定欧洲疫苗路线图(IPROVE):为明天的疫苗描绘愿景。
Vaccine. 2018 Feb 21;36(9):1136-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.069. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Consensus document on European brain research.欧洲脑研究共识文件。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;77 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i1-49.
8
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
9
New indicators and indexes for benchmarking university-industry-government innovation in medical and life science clusters: results from the European FP7 Regions of Knowledge HealthTIES project.新的指标和指数,用于基准化医疗和生命科学集群中的产学研创新:来自欧盟第七研发框架计划知识区域 HealthTIES 项目的结果。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 28;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0414-5.
10
The potential of health sector non-governmental organizations: policy options.卫生部门非政府组织的潜力:政策选择
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Mar;9(1):14-24. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.1.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward European harmonization of national myasthenia gravis registries: modified Delphi procedure-based expert consensus on collectable data.迈向欧洲各国重症肌无力登记系统的协调统一:基于德尔菲改进法的可收集数据专家共识
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Mar 11;20(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03520-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying public and private investment in European biopharmaceutical research and development.量化欧洲生物制药研发领域的公共和私人投资。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 May 31;2(6):qxae060. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae060. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Systemic anti-cancer therapy patterns in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Europe.欧洲晚期非小细胞肺癌的全身性抗癌治疗模式。
J Cancer Policy. 2022 Dec;34:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100362. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
3
Estimating the Cost of Industry Investment in Drug Research and Development: A Review of Methods and Results.
估算药物研发行业投资成本:方法与结果综述。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059731. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059731.
4
How Much Does It Cost to Research and Develop a New Drug? A Systematic Review and Assessment.研究和开发一种新药需要多少钱?系统评价和评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1243-1269. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01065-y. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
5
Overuse of diagnostic testing in healthcare: a systematic review.过度使用诊断检测在医疗保健中的应用:一项系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jan;31(1):54-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012576. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
The Innovative Medicines Initiative -10 Years of Public-Private Collaboration.创新药物倡议——公私合作十年。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Dec 3;6:275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00275. eCollection 2019.
7
Health Care Industry Insights: Why the Use of Preventive Services Is Still Low.医疗保健行业洞察:预防性服务使用率为何仍然较低。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Mar 14;16:E30. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180625.
8
Defining Elements of Value in Health Care-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3].医疗保健价值的定义要素——一种卫生经济学方法:一份ISPOR特别工作组报告[3]
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.007.
9
Quantifying the economic impact of government and charity funding of medical research on private research and development funding in the United Kingdom.量化英国政府和慈善机构对医学研究的资助对私人研发资金的经济影响。
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 24;14:32. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0564-z.