Xu Yun, Liu Yang, Ding Ding, Ru Bin, Wan Quan, Ji Zhongwei, Liu Wenlong, Guo Ran, Hu Jiaqi, Zhang Nannan, Xu Langhai, Li Shun, Cai Wenjun
Department of Pain Management, Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Front Surg. 2024 Sep 19;11:1449838. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1449838. eCollection 2024.
To assess the clinical impact of unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) in managing patients with adjacent vertebrae following lumbar fusion.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 21 patients, with a mean age of 67.4 years, who underwent ULBD for adjacent vertebra disease at our department from January 2021 to November 2023. We reviewed demographic data, surgical techniques, imaging studies, and patient-reported outcomes. The study compared Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, and imaging outcomes before surgery, immediately post-surgery, and at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery.
Evaluation of 21 patients with adjacent segment disease (ASD) (13 males, 8 females; mean age 67.42 years) was performed with follow-ups at various intervals post-surgery. Postoperative VAS, NRS, JOA, and SF-36 scores showed significant improvements compared to preoperative scores. Immediately after surgery, there were significant improvements in NRS score (2.76 ± 0.70 vs. 3.71 ± 0.85, < 0.05) and JOA score (15.38 ± 1.02 vs. 9.29 ± 1.01, < 0.05) compared to preoperative scores. Similarly, at 12 months post-surgery, significant improvements were observed in NRS score (1.52 ± 0.51 vs. 3.71 ± 0.85, < 0.05) and JOA score (25.0 ± 1.10 vs. 9.29 ± 1.01, < 0.05) compared to preoperative scores. The clinical satisfaction rate was 95.0% among all patients, with postoperative imaging examinations revealing a significant decompression effect. No complications were reported among the surgical patients.
This study suggests that endoscopic ULBD can be a safe and effective technique for managing symptomatic ASD, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes for patients with ASD. Endoscopic ULBD may serve as an alternative treatment option for ASD with lumbar stenosis.
评估单侧椎板切开双侧减压术(ULBD)在治疗腰椎融合术后相邻椎体疾病患者中的临床效果。
对2021年1月至2023年11月在我科接受ULBD治疗相邻椎体疾病的21例患者进行回顾性分析。我们回顾了人口统计学数据、手术技术、影像学研究以及患者报告的结果。该研究比较了术前、术后即刻、术后1个月、6个月和12个月的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、数字评定量表(NRS)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、简明健康状况调查量表(SF - 36)评分以及影像学结果。
对21例相邻节段疾病(ASD)患者(13例男性,8例女性;平均年龄67.42岁)进行了术后不同时间间隔的随访评估。术后VAS、NRS、JOA和SF - 36评分与术前评分相比有显著改善。术后即刻,与术前评分相比,NRS评分(2.76 ± 0.70 vs. 3.71 ± 0.85,P < 0.05)和JOA评分(15.38 ± 1.02 vs. 9.29 ± 1.01,P < 0.05)有显著改善。同样,术后12个月,与术前评分相比,NRS评分(1.52 ± 0.51 vs. 3.71 ± 0.85,P < 0.05)和JOA评分(25.0 ± 1.10 vs. 9.29 ± 1.01,P < 0.05)有显著改善。所有患者的临床满意率为95.0%,术后影像学检查显示减压效果显著。手术患者中未报告并发症。
本研究表明,内镜下ULBD对于治疗有症状的ASD是一种安全有效的技术,可为ASD患者提供满意的临床结果。内镜下ULBD可能作为腰椎管狭窄症合并ASD的一种替代治疗选择。