• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注视转移熵作为一种衡量在涉及自动化的动态工作空间中注意力分配的方法。

Gaze transition entropy as a measure of attention allocation in a dynamic workspace involving automation.

机构信息

University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Old Dominion University, Norfolk, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):23405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74244-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-74244-4
PMID:39379472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11461703/
Abstract

Real-world work environments require operators to perform multiple tasks with continual support from an automated system. Eye movement is often used as a surrogate measure of operator attention, yet conventional summary measures such as percent dwell time do not capture dynamic transitions of attention in complex visual workspace. This study analyzed eye movement data collected in a controlled a MATB-II task environment using gaze transition entropy analysis. In the study, human subjects performed a compensatory tracking task, a system monitoring task, and a communication task concurrently. The results indicate that both gaze transition entropy and stationary gaze entropy, measures of randomness in eye movements, decrease when the compensatory tracking task required more continuous monitoring. The findings imply that gaze transition entropy reflects attention allocation of operators performing dynamic operational tasks consistently.

摘要

现实工作环境要求操作人员在自动化系统的持续支持下执行多项任务。眼动通常被用作操作人员注意力的替代测量指标,但传统的汇总指标,如停留时间百分比,无法捕捉复杂视觉工作空间中注意力的动态转移。本研究使用注视转移熵分析对在受控的 MATB-II 任务环境中收集的眼动数据进行了分析。在研究中,人类受试者同时执行补偿跟踪任务、系统监控任务和通信任务。结果表明,当补偿跟踪任务需要更连续的监控时,注视转移熵和静止注视熵(衡量眼动随机性的指标)都会降低。研究结果表明,注视转移熵反映了执行动态操作任务的操作人员的注意力分配情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/0c57398d32c0/41598_2024_74244_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/2ae58907d81c/41598_2024_74244_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/61652f186957/41598_2024_74244_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/1ea232c84269/41598_2024_74244_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/0c57398d32c0/41598_2024_74244_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/2ae58907d81c/41598_2024_74244_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/61652f186957/41598_2024_74244_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/1ea232c84269/41598_2024_74244_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/364a/11461703/0c57398d32c0/41598_2024_74244_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Gaze transition entropy as a measure of attention allocation in a dynamic workspace involving automation.注视转移熵作为一种衡量在涉及自动化的动态工作空间中注意力分配的方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):23405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74244-4.
2
Gaze entropy metrics for mental workload estimation are heterogenous during hands-off level 2 automation.注视熵指标在 2 级自动化脱手水平下用于精神工作负荷估计时存在异质性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jul;202:107560. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107560. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
3
Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.多任务工作空间中的自动化信任和注意力分配。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behavior in static and dynamic scenes.注意力同步以及观看任务对静态和动态场景中注视行为的影响。
J Vis. 2013 Jul 17;13(8):16. doi: 10.1167/13.8.16.
5
Gaze allocation in face-to-face communication is affected primarily by task structure and social context, not stimulus-driven factors.在面对面的交流中,注视分配主要受到任务结构和社会语境的影响,而不是由刺激驱动的因素。
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
Acute methamphetamine and alcohol usage alters gaze behaviour during driving: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.急性吸食冰毒和饮酒会改变驾驶时的注视行为:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jul;38(7):636-646. doi: 10.1177/02698811241261024. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
7
Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: evidence from eye movement monitoring.眼睛总是吸引注意力,但注视定向取决于任务:来自眼动监测的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 14;45(5):1019-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
8
Attention and Entropy in Simulated Flight with Varying Cognitive Loads.注意与变认知负荷模拟飞行中的熵。
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020 Jun 1;91(6):489-495. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5504.2020.
9
Eye-Tracking in Physical Human-Robot Interaction: Mental Workload and Performance Prediction.人机物理交互中的眼动追踪:心理负荷与性能预测。
Hum Factors. 2024 Aug;66(8):2104-2119. doi: 10.1177/00187208231204704. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
10
The eye-mind wandering link: Identifying gaze indices of mind wandering across tasks.眼-心 wandered 链接:识别跨任务的 mind wandered 的注视指标。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct;46(10):1201-1221. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000743. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Biological Noise and Its Application: Understanding System Failures and Suggesting a Method to Enhance Functionality Based on the Constrained Disorder Principle.生物噪声及其应用之间的关系:理解系统故障并基于受限无序原理提出一种增强功能的方法。
Biology (Basel). 2025 Mar 27;14(4):349. doi: 10.3390/biology14040349.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of task difficulty on gaze behaviour during landing with visual flight rules in low-time pilots.任务难度对低飞行时长飞行员在目视飞行规则着陆过程中注视行为的影响。
J Eye Mov Res. 2023 Mar 20;16(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.16.1.3. eCollection 2023.
2
Guiding Attention via a Cognitive Aid During a Simulated In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Scenario: A Salience Effort Expectancy Value Model Analysis.在模拟的院内心脏骤停场景中通过认知辅助引导注意力:显著努力期望价值模型分析
Hum Factors. 2023 Dec;65(8):1689-1701. doi: 10.1177/00187208211060586. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
3
Examining the Effect of Interruptions at Different Breakpoints and Frequencies Within a Task.
研究任务中不同断点和频率的中断所产生的影响。
Hum Factors. 2023 Feb;65(1):22-36. doi: 10.1177/00187208211009010. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
4
Gaze entropy measures detect alcohol-induced driver impairment.注视熵测量可检测酒精引起的驾驶员损伤。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107519. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
5
The effects of flight complexity on gaze entropy: An experimental study with fighter pilots.飞行复杂性对视动熵的影响:一项针对战斗机飞行员的实验研究。
Appl Ergon. 2019 May;77:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
A review of gaze entropy as a measure of visual scanning efficiency.眼动熵作为视觉扫描效率的度量指标的综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jan;96:353-366. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.007.
7
Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.多任务工作空间中的自动化信任和注意力分配。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Gaze entropy reflects surgical task load.注视熵反映手术任务负荷。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):5034-5043. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4851-8. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
Time Sharing Between Robotics and Process Control: Validating a Model of Attention Switching.机器人技术与过程控制之间的时间共享:验证注意力切换模型。
Hum Factors. 2016 Mar;58(2):322-43. doi: 10.1177/0018720815622761. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
10
Modeling the control of attention in visual workspaces.建模视觉工作空间中的注意力控制。
Hum Factors. 2011 Apr;53(2):142-53. doi: 10.1177/0018720811404026.