Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Surgery, McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 10;19(10):e0311851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311851. eCollection 2024.
The properties of creative products-novelty and usefulness-are generally agreed upon by researchers. Yet, consensus is lacking on which personal and environmental factors contribute to an individual's creative potential, or to what extent. substantial research work has been conducted in this area, leading to the publication of many systematic reviews and meta-analyses collating the available evidence. However, many of these reviews have differing methodological and theoretical characteristics, and often report conflicting results. To summarize the current review literature on factors associated with creativity and better understand the similarities and discrepancies among reviews on the same topic, we plan to conduct an umbrella review of reviews.
This protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H78YS). We will search MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed reviews exploring factors associated with creativity. The quality of the included reviews will be assessed using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews (ROBIS), and the degree of study overlap across reviews assessed through calculation of the corrected covered area (CCA). Descriptive analyses will be performed to synthesize the results of the included reviews. We plan to use the results to create a holistic framework of the factors associated with creativity, which could be used to cross-validate existing creativity theories, or create new ones.
The results of this umbrella review will be published in a relevant psychology-focused journal and presented at local, national and international conferences. As all data is peer-reviewed and presented in aggregate, we will not require ethics approval.
创新产品的特性——新颖性和有用性,通常被研究人员所认可。然而,对于哪些个人和环境因素有助于个体的创造力,以及在多大程度上有助于个体的创造力,人们尚未达成共识。在这一领域已经进行了大量的研究工作,导致许多系统评价和荟萃分析的发表,这些研究汇总了可用的证据。然而,许多这些综述具有不同的方法学和理论特征,并且经常报告相互冲突的结果。为了总结与创造力相关的因素的现有综述文献,并更好地理解同一主题的综述之间的相似点和差异,我们计划对综述进行伞式评价。
本方案已在开放科学框架(DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/H78YS)中注册。我们将在 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 Google Scholar 中搜索探索与创造力相关的因素的同行评审综述。使用系统评价偏倚风险评估工具(ROBIS)评估纳入综述的质量,并通过计算校正覆盖面积(CCA)评估综述之间的研究重叠程度。将进行描述性分析,以综合纳入综述的结果。我们计划使用这些结果创建一个与创造力相关的因素的整体框架,该框架可用于交叉验证现有的创造力理论,或创建新的理论。
本伞式评价的结果将发表在相关的心理学期刊上,并在当地、国家和国际会议上进行介绍。由于所有数据都是经过同行评审并以汇总形式呈现的,因此我们不需要伦理批准。