LoPresto Lynnea M, Dang Julie H T, Dove Melanie S
Department of Nutrition, School of Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Sacramento, California.
Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2025 Jun;125(6):796-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
The US Department of Agriculture promotes farm to school (F2S) as an evidence-based approach to help school meals meet updated nutrition standards that promote health. California is a key agricultural state with strong support for F2S to promote local agriculture and equitable access to nutritious food for all students.
Examine district characteristics associated with F2S participation among California public districts during the 2018-2019 school year.
Cross-sectional evaluation of 2019 US Department of Agriculture Farm to School Census data.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: California public districts responding to the 2019 US Department of Agriculture F2S Census (N = 572).
Reported participation in F2S activities in 2018-2019. Covariates included district size, annual per-pupil spending, urbanicity, racial/ethnic composition, and percent free and reduced-price meal (% FRPM) eligibility.
Descriptive statistics (unweighted frequency and weighted percent) were reported for demographic characteristics. Weighted, multiple logistic regression assessed associations between demographic characteristics and F2S participation, reported as odds ratios (95% CI).
Nearly 78% of California respondents reported F2S participation. Top activities were serving local food in school lunch (73%) and breakfast (65%) and local food promotion at school (45.5%). The odds of participation among districts with enrollments ≥1000 were 1.79 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.79) times higher than smaller districts and 1.57 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.28) times higher in districts with lower annual per-pupil spending (≤$13 707). No significant differences were found by racial/ethnic composition, % FRPM eligibility, or urbanicity.
Disparities in F2S participation exist for small districts and those with high annual per-pupil spending that may lack the advantages of economies of scale. Grant incentives and support networks for these groups are recommended along with increased monitoring focused on the quality of F2S engagement. Administration of a brief annual state F2S Census could support more timely monitoring and accountability to align with state goals and improve opportunities for data sharing and community engagement.
美国农业部推广农场到学校(F2S)模式,作为一种基于证据的方法,以帮助学校膳食符合促进健康的最新营养标准。加利福尼亚州是一个重要的农业州,大力支持农场到学校模式,以促进当地农业发展,并确保所有学生都能公平地获得营养食品。
研究2018 - 2019学年加利福尼亚州公立学区中与参与农场到学校模式相关的学区特征。
对2019年美国农业部农场到学校普查数据进行横断面评估。
参与者/设置:回复2019年美国农业部农场到学校普查的加利福尼亚州公立学区(N = 572)。
报告2018 - 2019年参与农场到学校活动的情况。协变量包括学区规模、人均年度支出、城市化程度、种族/族裔构成以及免费和减价餐资格百分比(%FRPM)。
报告人口统计学特征的描述性统计数据(未加权频率和加权百分比)。加权多元逻辑回归评估人口统计学特征与参与农场到学校模式之间的关联,以比值比(95%CI)表示。
近78%的加利福尼亚州受访者报告参与了农场到学校模式。主要活动包括在学校午餐(73%)和早餐(65%)中提供当地食品,以及在学校进行当地食品推广(45.5%)。入学人数≥1000人的学区参与的几率比小一些的学区高1.79倍(95%CI 1.15至2.79),人均年度支出较低(≤13707美元)的学区参与几率高1.57倍(95%CI 1.08至2.28)。在种族/族裔构成、%FRPM资格或城市化程度方面未发现显著差异。
小型学区以及人均年度支出较高但可能缺乏规模经济优势的学区在参与农场到学校模式方面存在差异。建议为这些群体提供赠款激励和支持网络,并加强对农场到学校活动质量的监测。开展简短的年度州农场到学校普查可以支持更及时的监测和问责,以符合州目标,并改善数据共享和社区参与的机会。