Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Adv Nutr. 2020 Mar 1;11(2):357-374. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz094.
Farm to school programs (F2SPs) operate in 42% of school districts and are supported in part through federal and state policies as well as philanthropic funding. Although research evaluating the effects of farm to school-related activities on student outcomes is growing, a systematic review of the results and thus a synthesis of implications for future programming have not occurred. The primary objective of this systematic literature review is to summarize and evaluate studies on student outcomes associated with farm to school-related activities up to 1 September, 2017. Four databases spanning 4 research disciplines were used to identify full-text, English-language studies. Twenty-one studies were reviewed: 7 explicitly investigated F2SPs, and 14 evaluated the impact of school-based interventions that were relevant to activities reported in the 2013 and/or 2015 Farm to School Census. All of the F2SP studies (n = 7) and 85.7% of farm to school-related activity studies (n = 12) were multicomponent, and there was a wide variety of implemented intervention components across the reviewed studies. Results from F2SP and farm to school-related activity studies consistently show positive impacts on food and nutrition-related knowledge; most studies also suggest a positive relation between farm to school-related activities and healthy food selection during school meals, nutrition self-efficacy, and willingness to try fruits and vegetables. The impact of farm to school activities on fruit and vegetable consumption and preferences is unclear. The most common F2SP study limitations were study designs that preclude causal inference, outcome measurement with no reported or limited psychometric testing, lack of long-term outcome evaluation, and challenges related to quantifying intervention implementation. These findings underscore the need for more conclusive evidence on the relation between farm to school-related activities and changes in fruit and vegetable consumption.
学校农场项目(F2SP)在 42%的学区开展,并得到联邦和州政策以及慈善资金的部分支持。尽管评估与学校农场相关的活动对学生成果影响的研究在不断增加,但尚未对结果进行系统审查,因此也无法综合得出对未来规划的启示。本系统文献综述的主要目的是总结和评估截至 2017 年 9 月 1 日与学校农场相关的活动对学生成果的影响研究。使用涵盖 4 个研究学科的四个数据库来确定全文和英文研究。共审查了 21 项研究:7 项明确调查了 F2SP,14 项评估了与 2013 年和/或 2015 年学校农场普查报告的活动相关的学校干预措施的影响。所有 F2SP 研究(n=7)和 85.7%的学校农场相关活动研究(n=12)均为多组分,且在审查的研究中实施的干预措施组件种类繁多。F2SP 和学校农场相关活动研究的结果一致表明,这些活动对食品和营养相关知识有积极影响;大多数研究还表明,学校农场相关活动与学校餐中健康食物选择、营养自我效能感和尝试水果和蔬菜的意愿之间存在正相关关系。学校农场活动对水果和蔬菜消费和偏好的影响尚不清楚。最常见的 F2SP 研究局限性是研究设计排除了因果推断、没有报告或有限心理测量测试的结果测量、缺乏长期结果评估以及与量化干预实施相关的挑战。这些发现强调了需要更多关于学校农场相关活动与水果和蔬菜消费变化之间关系的更具结论性的证据。