• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估数字护理导航员对在常规护理中增加患者使用数字心理健康干预措施进行注册的影响。

Evaluation of the impact of a digital care navigator on increasing patient registration with digital mental health interventions in routine care.

作者信息

Jaso-Yim Brittany, Eyllon Mara, Sah Pratha, Pennine Mariesa, Welch George, Schuler Keke, Orth Laura, O'Dea Heather, Rogers Elizabeth, Murillo Lily H, Barnes J Ben, Hoyler Georgia, Peloquin Gabrielle, Jarama Kevin, Nordberg Samuel S, Youn Soo Jeong

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Health, Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, 5 Neponset St, Worcester, MA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2024 Sep 17;38:100777. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100777. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2024.100777
PMID:39410952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11474210/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Less than half of adults with mental health disorders in the United States receive appropriate or timely care. Digital Mental Health Interventions (DMHIs) have the potential to bridge this gap. However, real-world adoption of DMHIs is impeded by patient and provider-level technological barriers. Care navigators have the potential to address these challenges by providing technical support and enhancing patients' experience with DMHIs.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores the effect of a digital care navigator (DCN) on patient registration latency and rates of DMHIs implemented as part of a digital-first behavioral health care model integrated within routine care at a large multispecialty group medical practice.

METHODS

Data were collected from electronic medical records and DMHI registration data were obtained from the DMHI vendors. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the DCN's efforts to help patients register with their DMHIs. Moods median tests evaluated differences in registration latency and weekly registration rate pre- and post- DCN implementation. Change in registration likelihood as a function of DCN outreach latency was investigated using a Kaplan-Meier plot.

RESULTS

During the first eight months, the DCN made 1306 phone calls to 680 unique patients, successfully connecting with 66 %. DCN implementation also increased the median registration rate from 61.9 % to 76.9 %. Results showed that the expediency by which the DCN outreached patients directly impacted registration rate such that of those who were outreached by the DCN on the day of their referral to a DMHI, 96.86 % registered. This number was reduced to 76.15 % if the DCN reached them 1-day following referral, and 41.39 % 5-days after their referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a DCN shows promise for enhancing patient registration rates with DMHIs in routine healthcare settings.

摘要

背景

在美国,患有精神健康障碍的成年人中,不到一半能获得适当或及时的治疗。数字心理健康干预措施(DMHIs)有潜力填补这一差距。然而,患者和提供者层面的技术障碍阻碍了DMHIs在现实世界中的应用。护理导航员有潜力通过提供技术支持和改善患者对DMHIs的体验来应对这些挑战。

目的

本研究探讨数字护理导航员(DCN)对患者注册延迟以及作为大型多专科团体医疗实践中常规护理一部分实施的DMHIs实施率的影响。

方法

从电子病历中收集数据,并从DMHI供应商处获取DMHI注册数据。描述性统计用于描述DCN帮助患者注册DMHIs的工作。 Moods中位数检验评估了DCN实施前后注册延迟和每周注册率的差异。使用Kaplan-Meier图研究注册可能性随DCN outreach延迟的变化。

结果

在最初的八个月里,DCN给680名不同的患者打了1306个电话,成功接通率为66%。DCN的实施还将注册率中位数从61.9%提高到了76.9%。结果表明,DCN直接联系患者的速度直接影响了注册率,在患者被转介到DMHI当天就被DCN联系的患者中,96.86%进行了注册。如果DCN在转介后1天联系到他们,这个数字降至76.15%,在转介后5天联系到他们则为41.39%。

结论

在常规医疗环境中,使用DCN有望提高患者对DMHIs的注册率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a45/11474210/6f24b88a7788/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a45/11474210/54fe3e4b4f46/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a45/11474210/6f24b88a7788/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a45/11474210/54fe3e4b4f46/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a45/11474210/6f24b88a7788/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of a digital care navigator on increasing patient registration with digital mental health interventions in routine care.评估数字护理导航员对在常规护理中增加患者使用数字心理健康干预措施进行注册的影响。
Internet Interv. 2024 Sep 17;38:100777. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100777. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Implementing Technologies to Enhance Coordinated Specialty Care Framework: Implementation Outcomes From a Development and Usability Study.实施技术以加强协调专科护理框架:一项开发与可用性研究的实施成果
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 3;7:e46491. doi: 10.2196/46491.
3
Facilitators of and Barriers to Integrating Digital Mental Health Into County Mental Health Services: Qualitative Interview Analyses.将数字心理健康整合到县级心理健康服务中的促进因素和障碍:定性访谈分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 16;7:e45718. doi: 10.2196/45718.
4
Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review.提供数字心理健康干预措施使用的人力支持:系统元综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 6;25:e42864. doi: 10.2196/42864.
5
Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings.数字心理健康干预在医疗保健环境中的实施策略。
Am Psychol. 2020 Nov;75(8):1080-1092. doi: 10.1037/amp0000686.
6
We Have Spent Time, Money, and Effort Making Self-Help Digital Mental Health Interventions: Is Anyone Going to Come to the Party?我们已经花费了时间、金钱和精力来制作自助式数字心理健康干预措施:会有人来参加派对吗?
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 19;26:e58198. doi: 10.2196/58198.
7
Views of German mental health professionals on the use of digital mental health interventions for eating disorders: a qualitative interview study.德国心理健康专业人员对数字心理健康干预措施用于饮食失调症的看法:一项定性访谈研究
J Eat Disord. 2024 Feb 23;12(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-00978-1.
8
Satisfaction, Perceived Usefulness, and Therapeutic Alliance as Correlates of Participant Engagement in a Pediatric Digital Mental Health Intervention: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.满意度、感知有用性和治疗联盟与儿童数字心理健康干预中参与者参与度的相关性:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 6;7:e49384. doi: 10.2196/49384.
9
The Safety of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review and Recommendations.数字心理健康干预措施的安全性:系统评价与建议
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Oct 9;10:e47433. doi: 10.2196/47433.
10
Equity in Digital Mental Health Interventions in the United States: Where to Next?美国数字心理健康干预中的公平性:下一步在哪里?
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 24;26:e59939. doi: 10.2196/59939.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics Associated With the Use of the Mindfulness Meditation App Headspace in a Large Public Health Deployment: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.在大规模公共卫生部署中使用正念冥想应用程序Headspace的相关特征:横断面调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 22;9:e73457. doi: 10.2196/73457.
2
Strategies to Optimize Recovery in Frail Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Through Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation.通过基于运动的心脏康复优化心血管疾病虚弱患者恢复的策略。
J Lipid Atheroscler. 2025 May;14(2):159-173. doi: 10.12997/jla.2025.14.2.159. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
3
Digital mental health treatment implementation playbook: successful practices from implementation experiences in American healthcare organizations.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing digital mental health interventions at scale: one-year evaluation of a national digital CBT service in Ireland.大规模实施数字心理健康干预措施:爱尔兰一项全国性数字认知行为疗法服务的一年评估
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023 Oct 10;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00592-9.
2
Leveraging Implementation Science to Integrate Digital Mental Health Interventions as part of Routine Care in a Practice Research Network.利用实施科学将数字心理健康干预措施整合到常规护理中,作为实践研究网络的一部分。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 May;51(3):348-357. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01292-9. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
3
Substance use disorder bridge clinics: models, evidence, and future directions.
数字心理健康治疗实施手册:美国医疗保健机构实施经验中的成功做法
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 11;7:1509387. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1509387. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating the Implementation and Clinical Effectiveness of an Innovative Digital First Care Model for Behavioral Health Using the RE-AIM Framework: Quantitative Evaluation.运用 RE-AIM 框架评估创新性数字优先行为健康照护模式的实施及临床效果:定量评估
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 30;26:e54528. doi: 10.2196/54528.
物质使用障碍过渡诊所:模式、证据和未来方向。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 Apr 14;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00365-2.
4
The effects of a sleep-focused smartphone application on insomnia and depressive symptoms: a randomised controlled trial and mediation analysis.基于睡眠的智能手机应用对失眠和抑郁症状的影响:一项随机对照试验和中介分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;64(9):1324-1335. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13795. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
Evaluation of Telehealth Visit Attendance After Implementation of a Patient Navigator Program.实施患者导航员计划后远程医疗就诊出席率的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2245615. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45615.
6
Effect of Engagement With Digital Interventions on Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.参与数字干预对心理健康结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Nov 4;3:764079. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.764079. eCollection 2021.
7
The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality.数字精神病学的发展领域:当前证据以及应用程序、社交媒体、聊天机器人和虚拟现实的未来。
World Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;20(3):318-335. doi: 10.1002/wps.20883.
8
Organizational conditions that influence work engagement and burnout: A qualitative study of mental health workers.影响工作投入和倦怠的组织条件:一项心理健康工作者的定性研究。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2021 Sep;44(3):229-237. doi: 10.1037/prj0000472. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
9
Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.数字心理健康干预措施中用户参与的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24387. doi: 10.2196/24387.
10
Comparing Effectiveness Between a Mobile App Program and Traditional Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Evaluation Study.移动应用程序方案与传统认知行为疗法治疗强迫症的效果比较:评估研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jan 19;8(1):e23778. doi: 10.2196/23778.