• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用 RE-AIM 框架评估创新性数字优先行为健康照护模式的实施及临床效果:定量评估

Evaluating the Implementation and Clinical Effectiveness of an Innovative Digital First Care Model for Behavioral Health Using the RE-AIM Framework: Quantitative Evaluation.

机构信息

Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Worcester, MA, United States.

United Health Group, Minnetonka, MN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 30;26:e54528. doi: 10.2196/54528.

DOI:10.2196/54528
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the United States, innovation is needed to address the increasing need for mental health care services and widen the patient-to-provider ratio. Despite the benefits of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), they have not been effective in addressing patients' behavioral health challenges as stand-alone treatments.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of precision behavioral health (PBH), a digital-first behavioral health care model embedded within routine primary care that refers patients to an ecosystem of evidence-based DMHIs with strategically placed human support.

METHODS

Patient demographic information, triage visit outcomes, multidimensional patient-reported outcome measure, enrollment, and engagement with the DMHIs were analyzed using data from the electronic health record and vendor-reported data files. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework was used to evaluate the implementation and clinical effectiveness outcomes of PBH.

RESULTS

PBH had a 47.58% reach rate, defined as patients accepting the PBH referral from their behavioral health integrated clinician. PBH patients had high DMHI registration rates (79.62%), high activation rates (76.54%), and high retention rates at 15 days (57.69%) and 30 days (44.58%) compared to literature benchmarks. In total, 74.01% (n=168) of patients showed clinical improvement, 22.47% (n=51) showed no clinical change, and 3.52% (n=8) showed clinical deterioration in symptoms. PBH had high adoption rates, with behavioral health integrated clinicians referring on average 4.35 (SD 0.46) patients to PBH per month and 90%-100% of clinicians (n=12) consistently referring at least 1 patient to PBH each month. A third (32%, n=1114) of patients were offered PBH as a treatment option during their triage visit.

CONCLUSIONS

PBH as a care model with evidence-based DMHIs, human support for patients, and integration within routine settings offers a credible service to support patients with mild to moderate mental health challenges. This type of model has the potential to address real-life access to care problems faced by health care settings.

摘要

背景

在美国,需要创新来满足不断增长的精神卫生保健服务需求,并扩大医患比例。尽管数字心理健康干预(DMHI)有其益处,但它们作为单一治疗方法并不能有效解决患者的行为健康挑战。

目的

本研究评估了精准行为健康(PBH)的实施情况和效果,这是一种嵌入常规初级保健中的数字优先行为保健模式,它将患者转介给一个基于证据的 DMHI 生态系统,并提供战略性的人工支持。

方法

使用电子健康记录和供应商报告的数据文件,分析患者的人口统计学信息、分诊就诊结果、多维患者报告结局测量、入组和与 DMHI 的互动情况。使用 RE-AIM(可及性、有效性、采用、实施、维持)框架评估 PBH 的实施和临床效果结果。

结果

PBH 的可及性(即患者接受其行为健康整合临床医生的 PBH 转介)达到了 47.58%。PBH 患者的 DMHI 注册率(79.62%)、激活率(76.54%)和 15 天(57.69%)和 30 天(44.58%)的保留率均高于文献基准。共有 74.01%(n=168)的患者显示出临床改善,22.47%(n=51)显示出无临床变化,3.52%(n=8)的患者症状出现临床恶化。PBH 的采用率很高,行为健康整合临床医生平均每月为 PBH 转介 4.35(SD 0.46)名患者,90%-100%(n=12)的临床医生每月始终为 PBH 转介至少 1 名患者。在分诊就诊时,有三分之一(32%,n=1114)的患者被提供 PBH 作为治疗选择。

结论

作为一种包含基于证据的 DMHI、患者人工支持的护理模式,以及在常规环境中的整合,PBH 为支持有轻度至中度心理健康挑战的患者提供了一种可靠的服务。这种模式有可能解决医疗保健环境中面临的实际获得护理的问题。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Implementation and Clinical Effectiveness of an Innovative Digital First Care Model for Behavioral Health Using the RE-AIM Framework: Quantitative Evaluation.运用 RE-AIM 框架评估创新性数字优先行为健康照护模式的实施及临床效果:定量评估
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 30;26:e54528. doi: 10.2196/54528.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
7
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital mental health treatment implementation playbook: successful practices from implementation experiences in American healthcare organizations.数字心理健康治疗实施手册:美国医疗保健机构实施经验中的成功做法
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 11;7:1509387. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1509387. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of a digital care navigator on increasing patient registration with digital mental health interventions in routine care.评估数字护理导航员对在常规护理中增加患者使用数字心理健康干预措施进行注册的影响。
Internet Interv. 2024 Sep 17;38:100777. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100777. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Implementation Science and Practice-Oriented Research: Convergence and Complementarity.实施科学与面向实践的研究:融合与互补。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 May;51(3):336-347. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01296-5. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
3
Leveraging Implementation Science to Integrate Digital Mental Health Interventions as part of Routine Care in a Practice Research Network.
利用实施科学将数字心理健康干预措施整合到常规护理中,作为实践研究网络的一部分。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 May;51(3):348-357. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01292-9. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
4
The Effect of Periodic Email Prompts on Participant Engagement With a Behavior Change mHealth App: Longitudinal Study.定期电子邮件提示对行为改变移动健康应用程序参与度的影响:纵向研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 May 11;11:e43033. doi: 10.2196/43033.
5
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression: Scoping Review of User Engagement.数字心理健康干预在抑郁症中的应用:用户参与度的范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e39204. doi: 10.2196/39204.
6
Digital therapeutics for mental health: Is attrition the Achilles heel?心理健康的数字疗法:损耗是其致命弱点吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 5;13:900615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900615. eCollection 2022.
7
Effect of Engagement With Digital Interventions on Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.参与数字干预对心理健康结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Nov 4;3:764079. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.764079. eCollection 2021.
8
The effects of psychotherapies for depression on response, remission, reliable change, and deterioration: A meta-analysis.抑郁症心理治疗的反应、缓解、可靠变化和恶化效果的荟萃分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Sep;144(3):288-299. doi: 10.1111/acps.13335. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
9
Initial quantitative development of the Norse Feedback system: a novel clinical feedback system for routine mental healthcare.北欧反馈系统的初步定量开发:一种常规心理保健临床反馈的新系统。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3097-3115. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02825-1. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
10
Organizational conditions that influence work engagement and burnout: A qualitative study of mental health workers.影响工作投入和倦怠的组织条件:一项心理健康工作者的定性研究。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2021 Sep;44(3):229-237. doi: 10.1037/prj0000472. Epub 2021 Apr 1.