• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索在线科学传播中的“质量”:专家关于如何在数字媒体环境中评估和提升科学传播质量的思考。

Exploring 'quality' in science communication online: Expert thoughts on how to assess and promote science communication quality in digital media contexts.

机构信息

Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.

University of the West of England, UK.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):605-621. doi: 10.1177/09636625221148054. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1177/09636625221148054
PMID:36718874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336610/
Abstract

In recent years, the public visibility of science has greatly increased. In the digital media landscape, a wide range of players is now engaged in science communication via various online channels. While these developments offer opportunities, they also entail risks for the quality of science communication. This study explores how the quality of science communication can be assessed and promoted in the increasingly complex digital ecosystem. A two-wave survey with international science communication experts served as a basis to develop a quality framework for digital science communication and to formulate strategies to promote the quality of science communication online. Besides these outcomes, results hint at blind spots in the discourse of science communication quality that demand further investigation and reflection.

摘要

近年来,公众对科学的关注度大大提高。在数字媒体领域,现在有各种各样的参与者通过各种在线渠道参与科学传播。虽然这些发展为科学传播带来了机遇,但也给科学传播的质量带来了风险。本研究探讨了如何在日益复杂的数字生态系统中评估和促进科学传播的质量。这项研究采用了两轮国际科学传播专家调查,以此为基础制定了数字科学传播质量框架,并制定了在线促进科学传播质量的策略。除了这些成果,研究结果还暗示了科学传播质量话语中的盲点,需要进一步调查和反思。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7b/10336610/627915611597/10.1177_09636625221148054-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7b/10336610/6afa68f53f05/10.1177_09636625221148054-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7b/10336610/627915611597/10.1177_09636625221148054-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7b/10336610/6afa68f53f05/10.1177_09636625221148054-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7b/10336610/627915611597/10.1177_09636625221148054-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring 'quality' in science communication online: Expert thoughts on how to assess and promote science communication quality in digital media contexts.探索在线科学传播中的“质量”:专家关于如何在数字媒体环境中评估和提升科学传播质量的思考。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):605-621. doi: 10.1177/09636625221148054. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists.在数字和社交媒体生态系统中传播科学:健康科学家使用的策略范围综述与类型学研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Sep 3;5(3):e14447. doi: 10.2196/14447.
3
Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol.研究人员在数字和社交媒体生态系统中与公众使用的健康科学传播策略:一项系统综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e019833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019833.
4
[Digital health communication and factors of influence].[数字健康通信及其影响因素]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Feb;63(2):160-165. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03086-7.
5
An evidence synthesis of strategies, enablers and barriers for keeping secrets online regarding the procurement and supply of illicit drugs.关于非法药物采购和供应方面的在线保密策略、促成因素和障碍的证据综合分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Jan;75:102621. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102621. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
Will Podcasting and Social Media Replace Journals and Traditional Science Communication? No, but..播客和社交媒体会取代期刊和传统的科学传播吗?不会,但……
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 1;190(8):1625-1631. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab172.
7
Promoting engagement with quality communication in social media.促进社交媒体中优质沟通的参与度。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275534. eCollection 2022.
8
Ethics and Privacy Implications of Using the Internet and Social Media to Recruit Participants for Health Research: A Privacy-by-Design Framework for Online Recruitment.利用互联网和社交媒体招募健康研究参与者的伦理与隐私问题:在线招募的设计即隐私框架
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 6;19(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7029.
9
New media landscapes and the science information consumer.新媒体环境与科学信息消费者
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14096-101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212744110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Engagement With and Acceptability of Digital Media Platforms for Use in Improving Health Behaviors Among Vulnerable Families: Systematic Review.利用数字媒体平台改善弱势群体家庭健康行为的参与度和可接受性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 3;25:e40934. doi: 10.2196/40934.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Motivations and Channels for Nutritional Information Verification in Spanish University Communities.评估西班牙大学社区营养信息核实的动机和渠道
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 28;22(3):357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030357.
2
What are we talking about when we are talking about the audience? Exploring the concept of audience in science communication research and education.当我们谈论受众时,我们在谈论什么?探索科学传播研究与教育中的受众概念。
Public Underst Sci. 2025 May;34(4):408-423. doi: 10.1177/09636625241280349. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
Editorial Message.

本文引用的文献

1
Experience, experts, statistics, or just science? Predictors and consequences of reliance on different evidence types during the COVID-19 infodemic.经验、专家、统计数据,还是仅仅是科学?在 COVID-19 信息疫情期间,依赖不同证据类型的预测因素和后果。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Jul;30(5):515-534. doi: 10.1177/09636625211009685. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality.社交媒体在健康传播中的应用:信息质量的文献综述。
Health Inf Manag. 2023 Jan;52(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/1833358321992683. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
3
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.
编辑寄语。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2024 Jan;29(1):1-3. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230200.
4
Does knowledge make a difference? Understanding how the lay public and experts assess the credibility of information on novel foods.知识会产生影响吗?了解普通大众和专家如何评估新型食品信息的可信度。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Feb;33(2):241-259. doi: 10.1177/09636625231191348. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
4
How to fight an infodemic.如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.
5
Automatically Appraising the Credibility of Vaccine-Related Web Pages Shared on Social Media: A Twitter Surveillance Study.自动评估社交媒体上分享的疫苗相关网页的可信度:一项推特监测研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 4;21(11):e14007. doi: 10.2196/14007.
6
The development and validation of an instrument to measure the quality of health research reports in the lay media.一种用于衡量大众媒体中健康研究报告质量的工具的开发与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4259-y.
7
Defining criteria for good environmental journalism and testing their applicability: An environmental news review as a first step to more evidence based environmental science reporting.定义优秀环境新闻的标准并检验其适用性:作为迈向更具证据基础的环境科学报道的第一步,对环境新闻进行回顾。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 May;26(4):418-433. doi: 10.1177/0963662515597195. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the "new media" online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles?科学2.0的公众传播:通过在线“新媒体”进行的科学传播是一场真正的变革,还是换汤不换药?
EMBO Rep. 2014 Jul;15(7):749-53. doi: 10.15252/embr.201438979. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
9
Bridging the gap between science and decision making.弥合科学与决策之间的差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14055-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213532110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.科学传播的下一步是什么?有前途的方向和挥之不去的干扰。
Am J Bot. 2009 Oct;96(10):1767-78. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900041. Epub 2009 Sep 3.