Manuel Clemente Filipe, Pillitteri Guglielmo, Palucci Vieira Luiz H, Rabbani Alireza, Zmijewski Piotr, Beato Marco
Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center, 4960-320 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Biol Sport. 2024 Oct;41(4):173-185. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.139071. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
New training approaches have emerged advocating for the implementation of compensatory physical training. This approach aims to provide additional training that balances the load typically experienced by non-starters during a match. This may help maintain their readiness and ensures that their physical fitness is not compromised by the reduced exposure to match loads. Thus, this narrative review aims to describe the differences in external loads between starting and non-starting players and describe the studies conducted in compensatory training. Studies examining external load metrics such as total distances covered, high-speed running, and sprinting suggest that, adjusted for playing time, values are often higher in non-starting players. Although not standardized, there is an obvious decrease in exposure for these critical variables in non-starters. Additionally, internal load parameters such as perceived exertion and heart rate tend to be higher in starting players. Regarding the physical fitness impacts, evidence suggests differences observed between starters and non-starters in some aspects of physical performance, although the extent and significance of these differences can vary. The studies on compensatory training are limited, and the typical approach usually centres on running-based exercises and small-sided games, offering differing approaches to address the physical needs. The gap in research underscores the necessity for improved study designs that can shed light on the real impact of compensatory training. Presently, the practice of compensatory training has been adopted, yet a definitive understanding of its genuine influence, particularly in terms of enhancing physical fitness and mitigating injury risks, remains elusive.
新的训练方法已经出现,提倡实施补偿性体能训练。这种方法旨在提供额外的训练,以平衡非首发球员在比赛中通常承受的负荷。这可能有助于保持他们的准备状态,并确保他们的体能不会因比赛负荷暴露减少而受到影响。因此,本叙述性综述旨在描述首发球员和非首发球员之间外部负荷的差异,并描述在补偿性训练方面所进行的研究。对诸如总跑动距离、高速奔跑和冲刺等外部负荷指标的研究表明,在考虑比赛时间的情况下,非首发球员的这些数值往往更高。尽管没有标准化,但这些关键变量在非首发球员中的暴露明显减少。此外,诸如主观用力程度和心率等内部负荷参数在首发球员中往往更高。关于体能影响,有证据表明首发球员和非首发球员在某些体能表现方面存在差异,尽管这些差异的程度和显著性可能各不相同。关于补偿性训练的研究有限,典型的方法通常以跑步练习和小型比赛为中心,提供不同的方法来满足体能需求。研究差距凸显了改进研究设计的必要性,以便能够阐明补偿性训练的实际影响。目前,补偿性训练的做法已经被采用,但对其真正影响的明确理解,特别是在增强体能和降低受伤风险方面,仍然难以捉摸。