Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):2871. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20320-3.
Previous research has highlighted links between occupation and risk of COVID-19 transmission and suggests that occupational risk is influenced by covariates including socio-economic status, and deprivation. This study examined the perspectives of local authority teams of how changes in policy and advice, as set out in the UK government report 'Living with COVID,' affected COVID-19 transmission risk, response and resilience in workplace settings in Greater Manchester, an area that was disproportionately affected by the pandemic.
The project, which took place between August and November 2022, undertook a mixed methods approach to incorporate wide-ranging reflections of changes following the publication of 'Living with COVID'. Quantitative data was collected from local employers (n = 149) and employees (n = 397) using online surveys, and qualitative interview data was collected from Greater Manchester local authority teams (n = 19).
The research highlighted the inequitable impact of the pandemic on those already experiencing health inequalities, including people on more precarious employment contracts or those who were unable to work from home during the pandemic. The study found that the facilitators that helped local authorities to support employers to manage transmission included clear, detailed and timely national and local guidance, good communication, partnership working, funding, and timely access to data. Barriers to supporting employers included contradictory or confusing national guidance, structural inequalities, lack of funding, and delayed access to data. Interview participants reported that they were now utilising lessons learnt during the pandemic, along with the that partnerships developed, in order to tackle wider health issues and to prepare for future pandemics or health crises.
The findings of the study, which concur with previously published research conducted as part of the PROTECT project, highlight the importance of active reflection on the lessons learned during the course of the pandemic. The study draws on PH and EH teams' perspectives of managing COVID-19 transmission, in an area that was disproportionately affected by the pandemic, in order to add to our understanding of the best ways to ensure preparedness for future pandemics or health crises at a national level.
先前的研究强调了职业与 COVID-19 传播风险之间的联系,并表明职业风险受到包括社会经济地位和贫困在内的协变量的影响。本研究调查了大曼彻斯特地区地方当局团队的观点,即英国政府报告《与 COVID-19 共存》中提出的政策和建议的变化如何影响工作场所 COVID-19 传播风险、应对和恢复能力,该地区受大流行的影响不成比例。
该项目于 2022 年 8 月至 11 月期间进行,采用混合方法,广泛反映了《与 COVID-19 共存》出版后的变化。通过在线调查收集了当地雇主(n=149)和员工(n=397)的定量数据,并从大曼彻斯特地方当局团队(n=19)收集了定性访谈数据。
研究强调了大流行对那些已经经历健康不平等的人的不平等影响,包括那些签订更不稳定的就业合同的人或那些在大流行期间无法在家工作的人。研究发现,帮助地方当局支持雇主管理传播的促进因素包括清晰、详细和及时的国家和地方指导、良好的沟通、伙伴关系、资金以及及时获取数据。支持雇主的障碍包括相互矛盾或令人困惑的国家指导、结构性不平等、缺乏资金以及数据延迟获取。访谈参与者报告说,他们现在正在利用大流行期间吸取的经验教训以及建立的伙伴关系,以解决更广泛的健康问题并为未来的大流行或卫生危机做好准备。
本研究的结果与 PROTECT 项目中进行的先前发表的研究一致,强调了在大流行期间积极反思所吸取的经验教训的重要性。该研究借鉴了 PH 和 EH 团队在受大流行影响不成比例的地区管理 COVID-19 传播的观点,以增进我们对确保未来大流行或卫生危机在国家层面做好准备的最佳方法的理解。