Beale Sarah, Hoskins Susan, Byrne Thomas, Fong Wing Lam Erica, Fragaszy Ellen, Geismar Cyril, Kovar Jana, Navaratnam Annalan M D, Nguyen Vincent, Patel Parth, Yavlinsky Alexei, Johnson Anne M, Van Tongeren Martie, Aldridge Robert W, Hayward Andrew
Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, NW1 2DA, UK.
Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 May;16:100352. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100352. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
Workplaces are an important potential source of SARS-CoV-2 exposure; however, investigation into workplace contact patterns is lacking. This study aimed to investigate how workplace attendance and features of contact varied between occupations across the COVID-19 pandemic in England.
Data were obtained from electronic contact diaries (November 2020-November 2021) submitted by employed/self-employed prospective cohort study participants (=4,616). We used mixed models to investigate the effects of occupation and time for: workplace attendance, number of people sharing workspace, time spent sharing workspace, number of close contacts, and usage of face coverings.
Workplace attendance and contact patterns varied across occupations and time. The predicted probability of intense space sharing during the day was highest for healthcare (78% [95% CI: 75-81%]) and education workers (64% [59%-69%]), who also had the highest probabilities for larger numbers of close contacts (36% [32%-40%] and 38% [33%-43%] respectively). Education workers also demonstrated relatively low predicted probability (51% [44%-57%]) of wearing a face covering during close contact. Across all occupational groups, workspace sharing and close contact increased and usage of face coverings decreased during phases of less stringent restrictions.
Major variations in workplace contact patterns and mask use likely contribute to differential COVID-19 risk. Patterns of variation by occupation and restriction phase may inform interventions for future waves of COVID-19 or other respiratory epidemics. Across occupations, increasing workplace contact and reduced face covering usage is concerning given ongoing high levels of community transmission and emergence of variants.
Medical Research Council; HM Government; Wellcome Trust.
工作场所是严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)暴露的一个重要潜在来源;然而,对工作场所接触模式的调查尚缺。本研究旨在调查在英格兰新冠疫情期间不同职业的工作场所出勤情况及接触特征如何变化。
数据来自受雇/自营职业的前瞻性队列研究参与者(=4616人)提交的电子接触日记(2020年11月至2021年11月)。我们使用混合模型研究职业和时间对以下方面的影响:工作场所出勤情况、共享工作空间的人数、共享工作空间的时间、密切接触者数量以及口罩使用情况。
工作场所出勤情况和接触模式因职业和时间而异。医疗工作者(78%[95%置信区间:75%-81%])和教育工作者(64%[59%-69%])白天高强度空间共享的预测概率最高,他们有大量密切接触者的概率也最高(分别为36%[32%-40%]和38%[33%-43%])。教育工作者在密切接触期间佩戴口罩的预测概率也相对较低(51%[44%-57%])。在所有职业群体中,在限制较宽松阶段,工作空间共享和密切接触增加,口罩使用减少。
工作场所接触模式和口罩使用的主要差异可能导致新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)风险不同。职业和限制阶段的变化模式可能为未来新冠疫情或其他呼吸道传染病的干预措施提供参考。鉴于社区传播持续处于高水平以及变异株的出现,各职业工作场所接触增加和口罩使用减少令人担忧。
医学研究理事会;英国政府;惠康信托基金会。