Suppr超能文献

影响澳大利亚初级医疗实践中虚拟护理解决方案采用情况的因素:一项系统综述。

Factors that influence the uptake of virtual care solutions in Australian primary care practice: a systematic scoping review.

作者信息

Delaforce Alana, Maddock Emma, Wheeler Pamela, Jayasena Rajiv, Parkinson Joy

机构信息

Australian E-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Qld, Australia.

Capalaba Medical Centre, Capalaba, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

JBI Evid Implement. 2025 Jul 1;23(3):355-372. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000475.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Uptake of virtual care solutions in primary care settings has increased exponentially, and current evidence suggests high patient satisfaction but mixed clinician views.

AIMS

This paper aimed to identify factors influencing its implementation to support delivery to the right patient, in the right clinical context, at the right time. Further, this paper evaluates how the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) can be used to assess these factors that contribute to the uptake of virtual care innovations.

METHODS

This systematic scoping review identified empirical research on factors influencing the uptake of virtual care solutions in the Australian primary care setting. Searches were undertaken in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The CFIR was used to code factors influencing the implementation of virtual care solutions. Inductive coding was used to generate new constructs where no appropriate CFIR construct could be identified.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible studies were identified as eligible for inclusion. Five common influencing factors were identified. Three are from the existing CFIR framework, and two are newly developed constructs. CFIR constructs included innovation relative advantage, capability, and IT infrastructure. New constructs included accessibility and suitability. A further six new constructs were identified (trust, privacy, governance, unintended consequences, preference, and choice) but these were not prominently mentioned.

CONCLUSIONS

Common factors influence virtual care uptake in Australian primary care. The CFIR assisted in conceptualizing these but was not sufficient for capturing factors unique to virtual care. Newly developed constructs are noted to be of importance in the literature, but further research is needed to understand whether they are applicable in multiple contexts.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A286.

摘要

引言

基层医疗环境中虚拟医疗解决方案的采用呈指数级增长,目前的证据表明患者满意度较高,但临床医生的看法不一。

目的

本文旨在确定影响其实施的因素,以支持在正确的临床环境中、在正确的时间为正确的患者提供服务。此外,本文评估了更新后的实施研究综合框架(CFIR)如何用于评估这些有助于采用虚拟医疗创新的因素。

方法

本系统综述确定了关于影响澳大利亚基层医疗环境中虚拟医疗解决方案采用的因素的实证研究。在Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science中进行了检索。CFIR被用于对影响虚拟医疗解决方案实施的因素进行编码。在无法识别合适的CFIR结构时,采用归纳编码来生成新的结构。

结果

确定了14项符合纳入标准的研究。确定了五个共同的影响因素。其中三个来自现有的CFIR框架,另外两个是新开发的结构。CFIR结构包括创新相对优势、能力和信息技术基础设施。新结构包括可及性和适用性。还确定了另外六个新结构(信任、隐私、治理、意外后果、偏好和选择),但未被重点提及。

结论

共同因素影响澳大利亚基层医疗中虚拟医疗的采用。CFIR有助于对这些因素进行概念化,但不足以捕捉虚拟医疗特有的因素。文献中指出新开发的结构很重要,但需要进一步研究以了解它们是否适用于多种情况。

西班牙语摘要

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A286。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验