Antes Alison L, Mart Adelina, DuBois James M
1 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Dec;11(5):408-423. doi: 10.1177/1556264616668775. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Principal investigators are responsible for a myriad of leadership and management activities in their work. The practices they use to navigate these responsibilities ultimately influence the quality and integrity of research. However, leadership and management roles in research have received scant empirical examination. Semi-structured interviews with 32 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded genetic researchers revealed that they considered leadership and management essential for effective research, but their scientific training inadequately prepared them. We also report management practices that the researchers described using in their labs, as well as their perceptions of a proposed intervention to enhance laboratory leadership. These findings suggest best practices for the research community, future directions for scientific training, and implications for research on leadership and management in science.
主要研究者在其工作中负责众多的领导和管理活动。他们用于履行这些职责的实践最终会影响研究的质量和完整性。然而,研究中的领导和管理角色很少受到实证检验。对32位由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的基因研究人员进行的半结构化访谈显示,他们认为领导和管理对有效开展研究至关重要,但他们所接受的科学训练却并未让他们做好充分准备。我们还报告了研究人员所描述的在其实验室中采用的管理实践,以及他们对一项旨在加强实验室领导力的拟议干预措施的看法。这些发现为研究界提出了最佳实践、科学训练的未来方向,以及对科学领域领导和管理研究的启示。