Tsubouchi Toshiro, Shiomi Hiroya, Suzuki Osamu, Hamatani Noriaki, Takashina Masaaki, Yagi Masashi, Wakisaka Yushi, Ogawa Atsuhiro, Terasawa Ayumi, Akino Yuichi, Ogawa Kazuhiko, Kanai Tatsuaki
Department of Medical Physics, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jan;26(1):e14528. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14528. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
We developed a software program for swiftly calculating dose distributions for carbon ion beams. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of dose calculations using this software and assess the robustness of dose distribution in treating prostate cancer.
At the Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, markers are inserted into the prostate gland and used for position verification. To account for geometric changes along the beam path due to marker translation, a beam-specific planning target volume (bsPTV) is set for each beam. To validate the accuracy of the dose calculations using the developed software, dose distributions for prostate and sarcoma cases were calculated and compared with the treatment planning system. To assess the robustness of the dose distribution, position verification data from 346 cases were utilized to reproduce dose distributions for three matching methods: bone matching, widely adopted in most particle therapy centers; marker translation, which involves direct translation to markers without bone matching; and marker translation after bone matching. The coverage of the target (D of clinical target volume (CTV)) was assessed to evaluate the robustness of the dose distribution. Additionally, statistical analyses were conducted for the dose distributions of each matching method.
The dose calculation for a single condition can be completed very quickly. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among dose distributions considering the three matching methods. When irradiation was performed with bone matching only, the D was reduced by more than 10% in approximately 7.5% of cases, making it as the poorest among the three matching methods. However, there was no significant reduction in target coverage with the other two methods.
We have demonstrated the accuracy of the developed software for rapidly calculating dose distributions for carbon ion beams and confirmed the robustness of the dose distributions based on the bsPTV.
我们开发了一个用于快速计算碳离子束剂量分布的软件程序。本研究旨在评估使用该软件进行剂量计算的准确性,并评估其在治疗前列腺癌时剂量分布的稳健性。
在大阪重离子治疗中心,将标志物插入前列腺并用于位置验证。为了考虑由于标志物平移导致的沿射线路径的几何变化,为每条射线设置了特定于射线的计划靶区(bsPTV)。为了验证所开发软件剂量计算的准确性,计算了前列腺和肉瘤病例的剂量分布,并与治疗计划系统进行比较。为了评估剂量分布的稳健性,可以利用来自346例病例的位置验证数据,通过三种匹配方法重现剂量分布:大多数粒子治疗中心广泛采用的骨匹配;不进行骨匹配直接平移到标志物的标志物平移;以及骨匹配后的标志物平移。评估靶区的覆盖情况(临床靶区(CTV)的D值)以评估剂量分布的稳健性。此外,对每种匹配方法的剂量分布进行了统计分析。
单一条件下的剂量计算可以非常快速地完成。统计分析显示,考虑三种匹配方法时,剂量分布之间存在显著差异。仅采用骨匹配进行照射时,约7.5%的病例中D值降低超过10%,使其成为三种匹配方法中最差的一种。然而,其他两种方法的靶区覆盖没有显著降低。
我们已经证明了所开发的用于快速计算碳离子束剂量分布的软件的准确性,并基于bsPTV证实了剂量分布的稳健性。