Suppr超能文献

Visionix VX120+平台用于干眼筛查的诊断性能

Diagnostic Performance of Visionix VX120+ Platform for Dry Eye Screening.

作者信息

Martínez-Plaza Elena, Barberán-Bernardos Laura, Molina-Martín Ainhoa, Piñero David P

机构信息

Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.

University of Valladolid, 47001 Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 12;14(20):2276. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202276.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of diagnosing dry eye disease (DED) by using the Visionix VX120+, to establish reference values for tear meniscus height (TMH) and non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), and to compare the NIBUT measurements with the fluorescein tear break-up time (FBUT), Methods: fifty-eight subjects (34 dry eye and 24 control) were enrolled. The TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50% were evaluated with the Visionix VX120+, and the FBUT was measured with a slit-lamp. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance, and the Bland-Altman method was performed to analyze the agreement.

RESULTS

The areas under the curve were 0.62, 0.60, and 0.70 for the TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50%, respectively. The optimal cut-off values (sensitivity, specificity) were 0.29 (0.62, 0.67), 5.05 (0.85, 0.46), and 7.35 (0.65, 0.79) for the TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50%, respectively. The mean differences (lower, upper limits of agreement) were -1.10 (-8.78, 6.58) and 1.55 (-5.68, 8.78) for the first NIBUT vs. FBUT and the NIBUT50% vs. FBUT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the NIBUT50% can be a useful tool for dry eye screening, with acceptable values of sensitivity and specificity. First, the NIBUT and NIBUT50% should not be used interchangeably with the FBUT.

摘要

目的

评估使用Visionix VX120+诊断干眼病(DED)的准确性,建立泪河高度(TMH)和非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)的参考值,并将NIBUT测量值与荧光素泪膜破裂时间(FBUT)进行比较。方法:招募了58名受试者(34名干眼患者和24名对照者)。使用Visionix VX120+评估TMH、首次NIBUT和NIBUT50%,并使用裂隙灯测量FBUT。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断性能,并采用Bland-Altman方法分析一致性。

结果

TMH、首次NIBUT和NIBUT50%的曲线下面积分别为0.62、0.60和0.70。TMH、首次NIBUT和NIBUT50%的最佳截断值(敏感性、特异性)分别为0.29(0.62,0.67)、5.05(0.85,0.46)和7.35(0.65,0.79)。首次NIBUT与FBUT以及NIBUT50%与FBUT的平均差异(一致性下限、上限)分别为-1.10(-8.78,6.58)和1.55(-5.68,8.78)。

结论

总之,NIBUT50%可作为干眼筛查的有用工具,其敏感性和特异性值可接受。首先,NIBUT和NIBUT50%不应与FBUT互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990f/11506794/b9f133026349/diagnostics-14-02276-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验