• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Visionix VX120+平台用于干眼筛查的诊断性能

Diagnostic Performance of Visionix VX120+ Platform for Dry Eye Screening.

作者信息

Martínez-Plaza Elena, Barberán-Bernardos Laura, Molina-Martín Ainhoa, Piñero David P

机构信息

Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.

University of Valladolid, 47001 Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 12;14(20):2276. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202276.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14202276
PMID:39451598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11506794/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of diagnosing dry eye disease (DED) by using the Visionix VX120+, to establish reference values for tear meniscus height (TMH) and non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), and to compare the NIBUT measurements with the fluorescein tear break-up time (FBUT), Methods: fifty-eight subjects (34 dry eye and 24 control) were enrolled. The TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50% were evaluated with the Visionix VX120+, and the FBUT was measured with a slit-lamp. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance, and the Bland-Altman method was performed to analyze the agreement.

RESULTS

The areas under the curve were 0.62, 0.60, and 0.70 for the TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50%, respectively. The optimal cut-off values (sensitivity, specificity) were 0.29 (0.62, 0.67), 5.05 (0.85, 0.46), and 7.35 (0.65, 0.79) for the TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50%, respectively. The mean differences (lower, upper limits of agreement) were -1.10 (-8.78, 6.58) and 1.55 (-5.68, 8.78) for the first NIBUT vs. FBUT and the NIBUT50% vs. FBUT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the NIBUT50% can be a useful tool for dry eye screening, with acceptable values of sensitivity and specificity. First, the NIBUT and NIBUT50% should not be used interchangeably with the FBUT.

摘要

目的

评估使用Visionix VX120+诊断干眼病(DED)的准确性,建立泪河高度(TMH)和非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)的参考值,并将NIBUT测量值与荧光素泪膜破裂时间(FBUT)进行比较。方法:招募了58名受试者(34名干眼患者和24名对照者)。使用Visionix VX120+评估TMH、首次NIBUT和NIBUT50%,并使用裂隙灯测量FBUT。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断性能,并采用Bland-Altman方法分析一致性。

结果

TMH、首次NIBUT和NIBUT50%的曲线下面积分别为0.62、0.60和0.70。TMH、首次NIBUT和NIBUT50%的最佳截断值(敏感性、特异性)分别为0.29(0.62,0.67)、5.05(0.85,0.46)和7.35(0.65,0.79)。首次NIBUT与FBUT以及NIBUT50%与FBUT的平均差异(一致性下限、上限)分别为-1.10(-8.78,6.58)和1.55(-5.68,8.78)。

结论

总之,NIBUT50%可作为干眼筛查的有用工具,其敏感性和特异性值可接受。首先,NIBUT和NIBUT50%不应与FBUT互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990f/11506794/9140184b36ff/diagnostics-14-02276-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990f/11506794/b9f133026349/diagnostics-14-02276-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990f/11506794/9140184b36ff/diagnostics-14-02276-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990f/11506794/b9f133026349/diagnostics-14-02276-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990f/11506794/9140184b36ff/diagnostics-14-02276-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Performance of Visionix VX120+ Platform for Dry Eye Screening.Visionix VX120+平台用于干眼筛查的诊断性能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 12;14(20):2276. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202276.
2
Repeatability of non-invasive break-up time measures with a new automated dry eye platform in healthy eyes.新型自动化干眼仪测量健康人非侵入性泪膜破裂时间的可重复性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;40(11):2855-2864. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01470-w. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
3
[Multimodal evaluation of the ocular surface using a the new Lacrydiag device].[使用新型Lacrydiag设备对眼表进行多模态评估]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021 Mar;44(3):313-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.06.045. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
4
[Evaluation of tear film and meibomian gland function in dry eye patients using Keratograph 5M].[使用角膜地形图仪5M评估干眼患者的泪膜和睑板腺功能]
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 May 25;45(4):422-428. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2016.07.14.
5
Ability of non-invasive tear break-up time to determine tear instability in contact lens wearers.非侵入性泪膜破裂时间在隐形眼镜佩戴者中对泪膜不稳定的评估作用。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;42(3):959-968. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02079-3. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
Ocular surface parameters repeatability and agreement -A comparison between Keratograph 5M and IDRA.眼表参数重复性和一致性——Keratograph 5M 与 IDRA 的比较。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Dec;47(6):102281. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102281. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
7
Agreement between invasive and noninvasive measurement of tear film breakup time.泪膜破裂时间的侵袭性与非侵袭性测量之间的一致性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 15;14(1):3852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54219-1.
8
Application of visante optical coherence tomography tear meniscus height measurement in the diagnosis of dry eye disease.应用 Visante 光学相干断层扫描泪膜半月板高度测量诊断干眼。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Oct;117(10):1923-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.057. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tear film break-up time assessed by the simple manual interferometric device.简单手动干涉仪评估的非侵入性泪膜破裂时间的诊断准确性。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Apr;46(2):101776. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101776. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
10
Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement between three different diagnostic imaging platforms for tear film evaluation of normal and dry eye disease.三种不同诊断成像平台评估正常和干眼疾病泪膜的重复性、可再现性和一致性。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Jul;37(10):2042-2047. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02281-2. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comprehensive Study on Tear Meniscus Height Inter-Eye Differences in Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Diagnosis.水液缺乏型干眼诊断中泪膜半月板高度双眼差异的综合研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 23;13(3):659. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030659.
2
Comparing automated and manual assessments of tear break-up time using different non-invasive devices and a fluorescein procedure.比较使用不同非侵入性设备和荧光素程序的泪膜破裂时间的自动和手动评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2516. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52686-0.
3
Reliability and agreement of subjective and objective non-invasive break-up time measurements in contact lens wearers.
隐形眼镜佩戴者主观和客观非侵入性泪膜破裂时间测量的可靠性和一致性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Jan;44(1):124-130. doi: 10.1111/opo.13243. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
4
Changes caused by fluorescein in the tear film evaluated with hybrid break-up time test as a new method - Part Two: Its effect on breakup locations and other quantitative values.应用新方法——混合泪膜破裂时间试验评估荧光素对泪膜的改变——第二部分:对破裂位置和其他定量值的影响。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023 Sep;43:103651. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103651. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Repeatability, reproducibility and agreement between three different diagnostic imaging platforms for tear film evaluation of normal and dry eye disease.三种不同诊断成像平台评估正常和干眼疾病泪膜的重复性、可再现性和一致性。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Jul;37(10):2042-2047. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02281-2. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Dry eye disease and tear film assessment through a novel non-invasive ocular surface analyzer: The OSA protocol.通过新型非侵入性眼表分析仪评估干眼疾病和泪膜:OSA方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 10;9:938484. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.938484. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluation of tear meniscus height using different clinical methods.评估不同临床方法的泪液新月高度。
Clin Exp Optom. 2021 Jul;104(5):583-588. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878854. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Noninvasive Workup in the Setting of Dry Eye Disease.一种新型非侵入性检查在干眼症诊断中的性能
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 11;2020:5804123. doi: 10.1155/2020/5804123. eCollection 2020.
9
Repeatability of non-invasive break-up time measures with a new automated dry eye platform in healthy eyes.新型自动化干眼仪测量健康人非侵入性泪膜破裂时间的可重复性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;40(11):2855-2864. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01470-w. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
10
Correlation of Non-invasive Tear Break-Up Time with Tear Osmolarity and Other Invasive Tear Function Tests.非侵入性泪膜破裂时间与泪液渗透压及其他侵入性泪液功能测试的相关性。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 2;35(1):78-85. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2020.1730916.