Institute of Organoelement Compounds, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Gamaleya National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 123098 Moscow, Russia.
Molecules. 2024 Oct 20;29(20):4961. doi: 10.3390/molecules29204961.
Three types of coatings (contact-based, release-based, and combined coatings with both contact-based and release-based actions) were prepared and tested for the ability to inactivate SARS-CoV-2. In these coatings, quaternary ammonium surfactants were used as active agents since quaternary ammonium compounds are some of the most commonly used disinfectants. To provide contact-based action, the glass and silicon surfaces with covalently attached quaternary ammonium cationic surfactant were prepared using a dimethyloctadecyl[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ammonium chloride modifier. Surface modification was confirmed by attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy, and contact angle measurements. The grafting density of the modifier was estimated by XPS and elemental analysis. To provide release-based action, the widely used quaternary ammonium cationic disinfectant, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), and a newly synthesized cationic gemini surfactant, C18-4-C18, were bound non-covalently to the surface either through hydrophobic or electrostatic interactions. Virus titration revealed that the surfaces with combined contact-based and release-based action and the surfaces with only release-based action completely inactivate SARS-CoV-2. Coatings containing only covalently bound disinfectant are much less effective; they only provide up to 1.25 log10 reduction in the virus titer, probably because of the low disinfectant content in the surface monolayer. No pronounced differences in the activity between the flat and structured surfaces were observed for any of the coatings under study. Comparative studies of free and electrostatically bound disinfectants show that binding to the surface of nanoparticles diminishes the activity. These data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 is more sensitive to the free disinfectants.
三种类型的涂层(接触式、释放式和兼具接触式和释放式作用的组合涂层)被制备并测试了灭活 SARS-CoV-2 的能力。在这些涂层中,季铵盐表面活性剂被用作活性成分,因为季铵化合物是最常用的消毒剂之一。为了提供接触式作用,使用共价附着的季铵阳离子表面活性剂的玻璃和硅表面使用十八烷基[3-(三甲氧基硅基)丙基]氯化铵修饰剂进行了制备。通过衰减全反射红外光谱、X 射线光电子能谱(XPS)、扫描电子显微镜和接触角测量法确认了表面改性。通过 XPS 和元素分析估计了修饰剂的接枝密度。为了提供释放式作用,广泛使用的季铵阳离子消毒剂苯扎氯铵(BAC)和新合成的阳离子双子表面活性剂 C18-4-C18 通过疏水或静电相互作用非共价结合到表面。病毒滴定表明,具有兼具接触式和释放式作用的表面和仅具有释放式作用的表面可完全灭活 SARS-CoV-2。仅含有共价结合消毒剂的涂层的效果要差得多;它们仅能使病毒滴度降低 1.25 log10,可能是因为表面单层中的消毒剂含量低。对于任何研究中的涂层,在活性方面,平面和结构化表面之间均未观察到明显差异。对自由和静电结合的消毒剂的比较研究表明,与纳米颗粒表面的结合会降低其活性。这些数据表明,SARS-CoV-2 对游离消毒剂更为敏感。