Davies Livestock Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
Foundation for Rabbit Free Australia, P.O. Box 145, Collinswood, Adelaide, SA 5081, Australia.
Viruses. 2024 Sep 30;16(10):1553. doi: 10.3390/v16101553.
Surveillance of wildlife virus impacts can be passive or active. Both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, especially regarding cost and knowledge that can be gained. Monitoring of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (GI.1 and GI.2) in South Australia has utilised both strategies and their methods and gained insights are discussed. Active strategies to monitor the continuing impact of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus 2 (GI.2) on susceptible lagomorphs in countries such as the USA, Mexico, South Africa, Spain, France and Portugal are encouraged to gain critical insights into the evolution, spread and impact of this virus. Furthermore, there are lessons here for the international monitoring of diseases in wildlife, particularly where there is a risk of them becoming zoonotic.
野生动物病毒影响的监测可以是被动的，也可以是主动的。这两种方法各有优缺点，特别是在成本和可以获得的知识方面。南澳大利亚州对兔出血症病毒（GI.1 和 GI.2）的监测同时采用了这两种策略，讨论了它们的方法和获得的见解。鼓励美国、墨西哥、南非、西班牙、法国和葡萄牙等国家采取积极策略，监测兔出血症病毒 2（GI.2）对易感兔形目动物的持续影响，以深入了解该病毒的进化、传播和影响。此外，这也为国际上监测野生动物疾病提供了经验教训，特别是在这些疾病有可能成为人畜共患病的情况下。
