Department of Ophthalmology, Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Haikou, Hainan, 570208, China.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 29;24(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03722-0.
To evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology in recognizing tessellated fundus in students aged 7-14 years.
A retrospective study was conducted to collect consecutive fundus photographs for visual function screening of students aged 7-14 years old in Haikou City from June 2018 to May 2019, and 1907 cases were included in the study. Among them, 949 cases were male and 958cases were female. The results were manually analyzed by two attending ophthalmologists to ensure the accuracy of the results. In case of discrepancies between the results analyzed by the two methods, the manual results were used as the standard. To assess the sensitivity and specificity of AI in recognizing tessellated fundus, a Kappa consistency test was performed comparing the results of manual recognition with those of AI recognition.
Among 1907 cases, 1782 cases, or 93.4%, were completely consistent with the recognition results of manual and AI; 125 cases, or 6.6%, were analyzed with differences. The diagnostic rates of manual and AI for tessellated fundus were 26.1% and 26.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and area of the ROC curve (AUC) of AI for recognizing tessellated fundus in students aged 7-14 years were 88.0%, 95.4% and 0.917, respectively. The results of test showed that that the manual and AI identification results were highly consistent (κ = 0.831, P = 0.000).
AI analysis has high specificity and sensitivity for tessellated fundus identification in students aged 7-14 years, and it is feasible to apply artificial intelligence to visual function screening in students aged 7-14 years.
评估人工智能(AI)技术识别 7-14 岁学生棋盘格眼底的准确性。
本回顾性研究收集了 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 5 月海口市 7-14 岁学生视力功能筛查的连续眼底照片,共纳入 1907 例,其中男 949 例,女 958 例。两名主治眼科医生对结果进行人工分析,以确保结果的准确性。如果两种方法分析的结果存在差异,则以手动结果为准。为评估 AI 识别棋盘格眼底的灵敏度和特异性,通过 Kappa 一致性检验比较手动识别和 AI 识别的结果。
在 1907 例中,1782 例(93.4%)与手动和 AI 识别结果完全一致;125 例(6.6%)存在差异。手动和 AI 对棋盘格眼底的诊断率分别为 26.1%和 26.4%。AI 识别 7-14 岁学生棋盘格眼底的灵敏度、特异性和 ROC 曲线(AUC)面积分别为 88.0%、95.4%和 0.917。检验结果表明,手动和 AI 识别结果高度一致(κ=0.831,P=0.000)。
AI 分析对 7-14 岁学生棋盘格眼底的识别具有较高的特异性和灵敏度,将人工智能应用于 7-14 岁学生的视力功能筛查是可行的。