• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用锥形束计算机断层扫描合成的后前位头影测量图像评估基于多阶段卷积神经网络的全自动地标识别系统。

Evaluation of a multi-stage convolutional neural network-based fully automated landmark identification system using cone-beam computed tomographysynthesized posteroanterior cephalometric images.

作者信息

Kim Min-Jung, Liu Yi, Oh Song Hee, Ahn Hyo-Won, Kim Seong-Hun, Nelson Gerald

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Korean J Orthod. 2021 Mar 25;51(2):77-85. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.77.

DOI:10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.77
PMID:33678623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7940808/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of a multi-stage convolutional neural network (CNN) model-based automated identification system for posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric landmarks.

METHODS

The multi-stage CNN model was implemented with a personal computer. A total of 430 PA-cephalograms synthesized from cone-beam computed tomography scans (CBCT-PA) were selected as samples. Twenty-three landmarks used for Tweemac analysis were manually identified on all CBCT-PA images by a single examiner. Intra-examiner reproducibility was confirmed by repeating the identification on 85 randomly selected images, which were subsequently set as test data, with a two-week interval before training. For initial learning stage of the multi-stage CNN model, the data from 345 of 430 CBCT-PA images were used, after which the multi-stage CNN model was tested with previous 85 images. The first manual identification on these 85 images was set as a truth ground. The mean radial error (MRE) and successful detection rate (SDR) were calculated to evaluate the errors in manual identification and artificial intelligence (AI) prediction.

RESULTS

The AI showed an average MRE of 2.23 ± 2.02 mm with an SDR of 60.88% for errors of 2 mm or lower. However, in a comparison of the repetitive task, the AI predicted landmarks at the same position, while the MRE for the repeated manual identification was 1.31 ± 0.94 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated identification for CBCT-synthesized PA cephalometric landmarks did not sufficiently achieve the clinically favorable error range of less than 2 mm. However, AI landmark identification on PA cephalograms showed better consistency than manual identification.

摘要

目的

评估基于多阶段卷积神经网络(CNN)模型的前后位(PA)头影测量标志点自动识别系统的准确性。

方法

使用个人计算机实现多阶段CNN模型。从锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT-PA)合成的430张PA头颅侧位片被选为样本。由一名检查者在所有CBCT-PA图像上手动识别用于Tweemac分析的23个标志点。通过在85张随机选择的图像上重复识别来确认检查者内的可重复性,这些图像随后被设置为测试数据,在训练前间隔两周。在多阶段CNN模型的初始学习阶段,使用了430张CBCT-PA图像中的345张数据,之后用之前的85张图像对多阶段CNN模型进行测试。将这85张图像上的首次手动识别设置为真值标准。计算平均径向误差(MRE)和成功检测率(SDR)以评估手动识别和人工智能(AI)预测中的误差。

结果

对于2mm或更低的误差,AI显示平均MRE为2.23±2.02mm,SDR为60.88%。然而,在重复任务的比较中,AI预测的标志点在相同位置,而重复手动识别的MRE为1.31±0.94mm。

结论

CBCT合成的PA头影测量标志点的自动识别未能充分达到临床上小于2mm的有利误差范围。然而,PA头颅侧位片上的AI标志点识别显示出比手动识别更好的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/a25a16186776/kjod-51-2-77-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/78a89a3d9288/kjod-51-2-77-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/ef7d12472958/kjod-51-2-77-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/ddcdd4555171/kjod-51-2-77-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/5cc1745ad3b1/kjod-51-2-77-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/439f62c449b1/kjod-51-2-77-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/a25a16186776/kjod-51-2-77-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/78a89a3d9288/kjod-51-2-77-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/ef7d12472958/kjod-51-2-77-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/ddcdd4555171/kjod-51-2-77-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/5cc1745ad3b1/kjod-51-2-77-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/439f62c449b1/kjod-51-2-77-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c6e/7940808/a25a16186776/kjod-51-2-77-f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a multi-stage convolutional neural network-based fully automated landmark identification system using cone-beam computed tomographysynthesized posteroanterior cephalometric images.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描合成的后前位头影测量图像评估基于多阶段卷积神经网络的全自动地标识别系统。
Korean J Orthod. 2021 Mar 25;51(2):77-85. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.77.
2
Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images.基于多阶段卷积神经网络与 CBCT 组合图像的自动头影测量标志点识别系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;21(2):505. doi: 10.3390/s21020505.
3
A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.一项关于锥形束计算机断层扫描生成的正位和侧位头颅侧位片上标志点识别可重复性的比较研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Jan;49(1):41-48. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.1.41. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
4
Accuracy of auto-identification of the posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using cascade convolution neural network algorithm and cephalometric images of different quality from nationwide multiple centers.使用级联卷积神经网络算法和来自全国多个中心的不同质量的头影测量图像对头影测量后前位标志点进行自动识别的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Apr;161(4):e361-e371. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.11.011. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.基于人工智能的自动头影测量分析准确性评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02881-8.
6
Automatic identification of posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using a novel deep learning algorithm: a comparative study with human experts.利用新型深度学习算法自动识别前后位头颅测量标志点:与人类专家的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 19;13(1):15506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42870-z.
7
Accuracy of posteroanterior cephalogram landmarks and measurements identification using a cascaded convolutional neural network algorithm: A multicenter study.使用级联卷积神经网络算法识别后前位头颅侧位片标志点和测量值的准确性:一项多中心研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2024 Jan 25;54(1):48-58. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.075. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
8
Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能驱动的头影测量分析能否替代手动描记?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Aug 1;46(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae029.
9
[Automated cephalometric landmark identification and location based on convolutional neural network].基于卷积神经网络的自动头影测量标志点识别与定位
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 9;58(12):1249-1256. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20230829-00118.
10
Convolutional neural network-based automated maxillary alveolar bone segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images.基于卷积神经网络的锥形束 CT 图像上颌牙槽骨自动分割。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Jun;34(6):565-574. doi: 10.1111/clr.14063. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
2D-to-3D: Predicting three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric measurements from two conventional X-ray images : From 2D to 3D with a computational tool without using computed tomography.二维到三维:从两张传统X射线图像预测三维头影测量值:借助计算工具从二维到三维,无需使用计算机断层扫描。
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00599-6.
2
Accuracy of web-based automated versus digital manual cephalometric landmark identification.基于网络的自动化与数字手动头影测量标志点识别的准确性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 1;28(11):621. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06021-6.
3
Does the FARNet neural network algorithm accurately identify Posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks?

本文引用的文献

1
Convolutional-neural-network-based diagnosis of appendicitis via CT scans in patients with acute abdominal pain presenting in the emergency department.基于卷积神经网络的 CT 扫描在急诊科急性腹痛患者中对阑尾炎的诊断。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 12;10(1):9556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66674-7.
2
Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: A scoping review.卷积神经网络在口腔医学影像诊断中的应用:范围综述。
J Dent. 2019 Dec;91:103226. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103226. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:
FARNet 神经网络算法能否准确识别后前头颅定位标志点?
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01478-z.
4
Machine Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Class III Malocclusions in Children.用于诊断儿童III类错牙合畸形的机器学习算法
Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 24;11(7):762. doi: 10.3390/children11070762.
5
AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review.正畸学中的人工智能:革新诊断与治疗计划——全面综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 7;13(2):344. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020344.
6
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Dentistry, a Comprehensive Review of Literature.人工智能在临床牙科中的应用:文献综述
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Dec 1;24(4):356-371. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.96835.1969. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: Current State and Future Perspectives.人工智能在正畸学中的应用:现状与未来展望。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;11(20):2760. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202760.
8
Automatic identification of posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using a novel deep learning algorithm: a comparative study with human experts.利用新型深度学习算法自动识别前后位头颅测量标志点:与人类专家的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 19;13(1):15506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42870-z.
9
Machine Learning Predictive Model as Clinical Decision Support System in Orthodontic Treatment Planning.机器学习预测模型作为正畸治疗计划中的临床决策支持系统
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Dec 20;11(1):1. doi: 10.3390/dj11010001.
10
Development, Application, and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Cephalometric Landmark Identification and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.人工智能在头影测量标志点识别与诊断中的发展、应用及性能:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 5;10(12):2454. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122454.
自动识别头影测量标志点:
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):69-76. doi: 10.2319/022019-129.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: .自动识别头影测量标志点:.
Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):903-909. doi: 10.2319/022019-127.1. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.一项关于锥形束计算机断层扫描生成的正位和侧位头颅侧位片上标志点识别可重复性的比较研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Jan;49(1):41-48. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.1.41. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
6
Medical Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Review.基于卷积神经网络的医学图像分析:综述
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 8;42(11):226. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1088-1.
7
Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.改变头部位置对锥形束计算机断层扫描和传统后前位头颅侧位片上进行的颌面区域横向测量准确性的影响。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Jul;46(5):20160180. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160180. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Fully automated quantitative cephalometry using convolutional neural networks.使用卷积神经网络的全自动定量头影测量法。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jan;4(1):014501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.014501. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
9
Landmark errors on posteroanterior cephalograms.后前位头颅X线片上的标志性误差。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Aug;150(2):324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.01.016.
10
Natural head position: An overview.自然头位:综述。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S424-7. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163488.