Vig Ayushi, Sinha Arvind, Yadav Taruna, Krishnamurthy Shreyas, Bhatt Somya, Rathod Kirtikumar J, Pathak Manish, Saxena Rahul, Khera Pushpinder Singh
Department of Pediatric Surgery and Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024 Sep-Oct;29(5):479-483. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_89_24. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in children, often requiring imaging for confirmation due to diverse presentations. While computed tomography scan is favored in many centers for its sensitivity, it comes with radiation exposure and higher costs. Ultrasonography, being radiation-free and cost-effective, is gaining popularity, especially in pediatric cases. However, its reported accuracy varies in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in pediatric appendicitis cases and to determine its precision in distinguishing between simple and complicated cases of appendicitis.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on children with suspected appendicitis who presented to the department of pediatric surgery. All patients underwent ultrasonography followed by appendicectomy based on considered clinical decision. Ultrasonography findings were compared with intraoperative observations categorized as uncomplicated or complicated appendicitis.
Among 152 patients, ultrasonography accurately diagnosed appendicitis in 94.6% of cases, with 5.38% having nonvisualized appendices. In our group, the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound to detect appendicitis were 94.62% and 95.65%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the test is 95.63%. However, in our study, the sensitivity of the ultrasonography to correctly identify if it is a simple or complicated appendicitis was only 54.9% but had a specificity of 98.7%. Thus, ultrasonography showed a much lower sensitivity (54.9%) in distinguishing between simple and complicated appendicitis.
Ultrasonography demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing pediatric appendicitis, making it a promising preoperative investigation. However, it may not accurately differentiate between simple and complicated cases. A comprehensive approach involving clinical and laboratory parameters alongside secondary imaging may be necessary for accurate diagnosis, especially in cases of perforated appendicitis.
急性阑尾炎是儿童常见的外科急症,由于临床表现多样,常需影像学检查来确诊。虽然计算机断层扫描因其敏感性在许多中心受到青睐,但它存在辐射暴露和成本较高的问题。超声检查无辐射且成本效益高,越来越受欢迎,尤其是在儿科病例中。然而,其报道的准确性在文献中有所不同。本研究旨在评估超声检查在儿科阑尾炎病例中的诊断准确性,并确定其区分单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎病例的精确性。
对儿科外科就诊的疑似阑尾炎患儿进行回顾性分析。所有患者均接受超声检查,然后根据临床决策进行阑尾切除术。将超声检查结果与术中观察结果进行比较,术中观察结果分为非复杂性或复杂性阑尾炎。
在152例患者中,超声检查准确诊断阑尾炎的病例占94.6%,5.38%的患者阑尾未显示。在我们的研究组中,超声检测阑尾炎的敏感性和特异性分别为94.62%和95.65%。该检查的诊断准确性为95.63%。然而,在我们的研究中,超声检查正确识别单纯性或复杂性阑尾炎的敏感性仅为54.9%,但特异性为98.7%。因此,超声检查在区分单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎方面的敏感性要低得多(54.9%)。
超声检查在诊断儿科阑尾炎方面显示出高敏感性和特异性,使其成为一种有前景的术前检查方法。然而,它可能无法准确区分单纯性和复杂性病例。对于准确诊断,尤其是在穿孔性阑尾炎病例中,可能需要一种综合方法,包括临床和实验室参数以及二次成像。