Rapid reviews methods series: considerations and recommendations for evidence synthesis in rapid reviews.
作者信息
King Valerie J, Nussbaumer-Streit Barbara, Shaw Elizabeth, Devane Declan, Kahwati Leila, Viswanathan Meera, Gartlehner Gerald
机构信息
Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA
Health Management & Policy, Health Systems & Policy, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, USA.
出版信息
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Nov 22;29(6):419-422. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112617.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rapid reviews methods series: considerations and recommendations for evidence synthesis in rapid reviews.快速综述方法系列：快速综述中证据综合的考量与建议
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Nov 22;29(6):419-422. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112617.
2
Key concepts in rapid reviews: an overview.快速综述的关键概念：概述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;175:111518. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111518. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Methods for the Development of Healthcare Practice Recommendations Using Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.利用系统评价和荟萃分析制定医疗保健实践建议的方法。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 8;12:699968. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.699968. eCollection 2021.
5
6
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence.改善研究证据在指南制定中的应用：8. 证据的综合与呈现。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Dec 5;4:20. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-20.
7
Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews.考科蓝快速评价方法学组为快速评价提供循证指导。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
8
Use of systematic reviews in clinical practice guidelines: case study of smoking cessation.系统评价在临床实践指南中的应用：戒烟案例研究
BMJ. 2001 Oct 13;323(7317):833-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7317.833.
9
Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.快速综述方法系列：快速定性证据综合指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):194-200. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620.
10
Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews.论文 2：进行快速审查。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 30;11(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02011-5.
本文引用的文献
1
Health economic evaluations of preventative care for perinatal anxiety and associated disorders: a rapid review.围产期焦虑及相关障碍预防性保健的健康经济评价：快速综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 27;14(2):e068941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068941.
2
Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness.Cochrane有效性快速综述方法指南的更新建议。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 6;384:e076335. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076335.
3
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.有哪些研究证据快速综述的最佳方法？系统综述和原始研究的综述。
Res Synth Methods. 2024 Jan;15(1):2-20. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1664. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users.快速评论方法系列：将患者和公众合作伙伴、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者作为知识使用者纳入其中。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):55-61. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112070.
5
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence.快速综述方法系列：评估证据确定性指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):50-54. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112111.
6
Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.优先级 III：使用詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系确定的前 10 项快速审查方法学研究优先事项。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
7
Telehealth for Substance Use Disorders: A Rapid Review for the 2021 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Guidelines for Management of Substance Use Disorders.远程医疗在物质使用障碍中的应用：对 2021 年美国退伍军人事务部和美国国防部物质使用障碍管理指南的快速回顾。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 May;175(5):691-700. doi: 10.7326/M21-3931. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline.系统评价中不进行荟萃分析的综合 (SWiM)：报告指南。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6890.
9
Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews.报告定量数据叙述性综合缺乏透明度：系统评价的方法学评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;105:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.019. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis.同一领域，不同物种：五种知识综合类型的目的不同，方法实施和质量也不同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
Zotero 插件