Elias Heidi, Larios Lindsay
Faculty of Graduate Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, Department of Midwifery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Birth. 2025 Sep;52(3):482-490. doi: 10.1111/birt.12893. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
Immigrants and newcomers are identified by many provincial midwifery associations as "priority populations." Recently, newcomer populations have shifted considerably, with more people coming to Canada with precarious immigration status who are increasingly ineligible for public healthcare insurance and facing barriers to accessing care. Our aims were to: (1) gain an understanding of the policies related to equitable access to midwifery care and how they may apply to migrant groups without public healthcare insurance and (2) identify existing policy themes, gaps, and regulatory barriers that limit access for this vulnerable population in Canada.
We conducted a high-level document content analysis using a health equity framework. We aimed to identify language related to equitable access in midwifery services, with particular emphasis on uninsured populations. A total of 64 documents were analyzed, including legislation and publicly available statements from midwifery regulatory bodies and associations.
Midwifery regulatory authorities and associations across Canada are consistent in establishing an expectation that midwives will provide accessible care to diverse clientele. However, how these commitments are put into practice varies considerably between jurisdictions. We compared the cases of Manitoba and Ontario to illustrate the disconnect between commitments to priority populations and implementation.
While there is a clearly demonstrated intention to provide equitable access to midwifery care to all people, including "priority populations" like migrants and newcomers, in practice, these commitments have not been fully realized. Equity is encumbered by broader structural issues, such as the growth in the number of newcomers without access to public health insurance. Moves toward equity within midwifery and healthcare more broadly need to meaningfully engage with other policy sectors, such as immigration, to be able to adapt to emerging issues affecting reproductive care, such as the growing precarity of newcomer populations in Canada.
许多省级助产士协会将移民和新移民确定为“优先群体”。最近,新移民群体发生了很大变化,越来越多持不稳定移民身份来到加拿大的人没有资格享受公共医疗保险,在获得护理方面面临障碍。我们的目标是:(1)了解与公平获得助产护理相关的政策,以及这些政策如何适用于没有公共医疗保险的移民群体;(2)确定限制加拿大这一弱势群体获得护理的现有政策主题、差距和监管障碍。
我们使用健康公平框架进行了高层次的文件内容分析。我们旨在确定与助产服务公平获得相关的表述,特别强调未参保人群。共分析了64份文件,包括立法以及助产监管机构和协会公开的声明。
加拿大各地的助产监管机构和协会一致期望助产士为不同客户提供可及的护理。然而,这些承诺在不同司法管辖区的实施情况差异很大。我们比较了曼尼托巴省和安大略省的情况,以说明对优先群体的承诺与实施之间的脱节。
虽然有明确的意图为所有人,包括移民和新移民等“优先群体”提供公平的助产护理,但实际上,这些承诺并未完全实现。公平受到更广泛的结构性问题的阻碍,例如无法获得公共医疗保险的新移民数量的增加。在助产领域以及更广泛的医疗保健领域实现公平的举措需要与其他政策部门,如移民部门进行有意义的互动,以便能够适应影响生殖护理的新出现问题,例如加拿大新移民群体日益不稳定的状况。