Stangherlin Stefen, Ding Yuzhe, Liu Juewen
Department of Chemistry, Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Small Methods. 2024 Nov 7:e2401572. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202401572.
Since 1990, numerous aptamers have been isolated and discovered for use in various analytical, biomedical, and environmental applications. This trend continues to date. A critical step in the characterization of aptamer binding is to measure its binding affinity toward both target and non-target molecules. Dissociation constant (K) is the most commonly used value in characterizing aptamer binding. In this article, homogenous assays are reviewed for aptamers that can bind small-molecule targets. The reviewed methods include label-free methods, such as isothermal titration calorimetry, intrinsic fluorescence of target molecules, DNA staining dyes, and nuclease digestion assays, and labeled methods, such as the strand displacement reaction. Some methods are not recommended, such as those based on the aggregation of gold nanoparticles and the desorption of fluorophore-labeled DNA from nanomaterials. The difference between the measured apparent K and the true K of aptamer binding is stressed. In addition, avoiding the titration regime and paying attention to the time required to reach equilibrium are discussed. Finally, it is important to include mutated non-binding sequences as controls.
自1990年以来,人们已经分离和发现了许多适体,用于各种分析、生物医学和环境应用。这一趋势一直持续到现在。表征适体结合的关键步骤是测量其对靶标和非靶标分子的结合亲和力。解离常数(K)是表征适体结合时最常用的值。在本文中,对可结合小分子靶标的适体的均相分析方法进行了综述。所综述的方法包括无标记方法,如等温滴定量热法、靶标分子的固有荧光、DNA染色染料和核酸酶消化分析,以及标记方法,如链置换反应。一些方法不被推荐,如基于金纳米颗粒聚集和荧光团标记DNA从纳米材料上解吸的方法。强调了测量的适体结合表观K与真实K之间的差异。此外,还讨论了避免滴定范围以及注意达到平衡所需的时间。最后,纳入突变的非结合序列作为对照很重要。