• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

滚动查找关于隆胸疾病的答案:应用经过验证的工具评估YouTube和TikTok上内容的质量

Scrolling for Answers About Breast Implant Illness: Application of Validated Tools to Assess the Quality of Content on YouTube and TikTok.

作者信息

Via Ioschpe Anais Di, Roy Nikita, James Justin, Alexis Malory, Kim Esther, Oleru Olachi O, Seyidova Nargiz, Henderson Peter W

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

CUNY School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Apr 2:22925503241234936. doi: 10.1177/22925503241234936.

DOI:10.1177/22925503241234936
PMID:39553514
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11561925/
Abstract

Popular video-sharing platforms YouTube and TikTok offer a plethora of information on the topic of breast implant illness (BII). As a largely patient-driven phenomenon, it is important to understand the influence of social media on patient knowledge regarding BII. This study sought to evaluate the quality, reliability, visibility, and popularity of YouTube and TikTok videos about BII. Two validated tools for health information, DISCERN and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), were utilized to evaluate the quality of information regarding the topic of BII on YouTube and TikTok. High DISCERN score indicates content of superior quality and reliability, while elevated PEMAT scores signify content that is easily understandable and actionable for viewers. The search phrase "breast implant illness" was used to screen videos, which were sorted based on relevance and view count. The first 100 videos that fulfilled inclusion criteria were independently graded by three reviewers. TikTok videos of longer duration, a higher number of shares, and in the patient education category were all significantly associated with a higher total DISCERN score ( < 0.05). YouTube videos that included a provider or a patient were significantly more likely to have a higher total DISCERN and PEMAT understandability score (all  < 0.05). Discussion of physician education, operation details, and patient experience was significantly associated with higher total DISCERN and PEMAT understandability scores (all  < 0.05). Total DISCERN and PEMAT scores for videos regarding BII on two popular social media platforms are low. Video length, patient experience categorization, and the presence of a provider are worth considering when developing high-quality online content for breast reconstruction and augmentation patients.

摘要

热门视频分享平台YouTube和TikTok提供了大量关于隆胸疾病(BII)的信息。作为一种主要由患者推动的现象,了解社交媒体对患者有关BII知识的影响很重要。本研究旨在评估YouTube和TikTok上关于BII的视频的质量、可靠性、可见性和受欢迎程度。使用两种经过验证的健康信息工具,即DISCERN和患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT),来评估YouTube和TikTok上有关BII主题的信息质量。DISCERN得分高表明内容质量和可靠性高,而PEMAT得分高则表示内容对观众来说易于理解且可采取行动。搜索短语“隆胸疾病”用于筛选视频,并根据相关性和观看次数进行排序。前100个符合纳入标准的视频由三位评审员独立评分。时长较长、分享次数较多且属于患者教育类别的TikTok视频都与更高的DISCERN总分显著相关(<0.05)。包含医疗服务提供者或患者的YouTube视频更有可能获得更高的DISCERN总分和PEMAT可理解性得分(均<0.05)。对医生教育、手术细节和患者体验的讨论与更高的DISCERN总分和PEMAT可理解性得分显著相关(均<0.05)。两个热门社交媒体平台上关于BII的视频的DISCERN和PEMAT总分较低。在为乳房重建和隆胸患者开发高质量在线内容时,视频长度、患者体验分类以及医疗服务提供者的参与值得考虑。

相似文献

1
Scrolling for Answers About Breast Implant Illness: Application of Validated Tools to Assess the Quality of Content on YouTube and TikTok.滚动查找关于隆胸疾病的答案:应用经过验证的工具评估YouTube和TikTok上内容的质量
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Apr 2:22925503241234936. doi: 10.1177/22925503241234936.
2
Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.抖音、快手和哔哩哔哩上与食管癌相关视频的信息质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23475-9.
3
Assessing quality, reliability and accuracy of polycystic ovary syndrome-related content on TikTok: A video-based cross-sectional analysis.评估TikTok上多囊卵巢综合征相关内容的质量、可靠性和准确性:基于视频的横断面分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70007.
4
Evaluation of social media videos on weight-loss surgery and GLP-1 agonists: a content quality and reliability analysis.社交媒体视频对减肥手术和GLP-1激动剂的评估:内容质量与可靠性分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11938-4.
5
YouTube and Bilibili as sources of information on oral cancer: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube和哔哩哔哩作为口腔癌信息来源:横断面内容分析研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02898-9.
6
Assessing the Video Content Quality of TikTok and Bilibili as Health Information Sources for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-Sectional Study.评估抖音和哔哩哔哩作为系统性红斑狼疮健康信息来源的视频内容质量:一项横断面研究。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Jun;28(6):e70341. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.70341.
7
Is YouTube a Reliable Source for Laryngomalacia Information?YouTube是喉软化症信息的可靠来源吗?
Cureus. 2025 Jun 2;17(6):e85252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85252. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
The quality and reliability of short videos about premature ovarian failure on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于卵巢早衰短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251351077. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351077. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
YouTube as a Source for Arabic-Speaking Parent Education on the Oral Hygiene of Children: A Social Media Content Analysis.YouTube作为阿拉伯语家长儿童口腔卫生教育的来源:一项社交媒体内容分析
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jul-Aug;42(4):1469-1477. doi: 10.1111/phn.13551. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
10
A Content Analysis of YouTube Videos on Allergic Rhinitis Management.关于过敏性鼻炎管理的YouTube视频内容分析。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr;77(4):1760-1767. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05396-6. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Arabic version of the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT): translation and validation.患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)的阿拉伯语版本:翻译与验证
Saudi Pharm J. 2025 Jun 5;33(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s44446-025-00013-7.

本文引用的文献

1
TikTok and YouTube as sources of information on anal fissure: A comparative analysis.TikTok 和 YouTube 作为肛裂信息来源的比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;10:1000338. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000338. eCollection 2022.
2
Cluster headache - The worst possible pain on YouTube.丛集性头痛 - 在 YouTube 上最严重的疼痛。
Headache. 2022 Oct;62(9):1222-1226. doi: 10.1111/head.14368. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
3
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.YouTube 视频作为睾丸扭转信息来源的质量评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:905609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609. eCollection 2022.
4
Assessing Vasectomy-Related Information on YouTube: An Analysis of the Quality, Understandability, and Actionability of Information.评估 YouTube 上的输精管切除术相关信息:信息质量、可理解性和可操作性分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 Mar-Apr;16(2):15579883221094716. doi: 10.1177/15579883221094716.
5
[About the communication of health research: generating trust through information and education.].关于健康研究的传播:通过信息与教育建立信任。
Recenti Prog Med. 2022 Mar;113(3):151-156. doi: 10.1701/3761.37478.
6
Evaluation of YouTube videos on primary bladder pain syndrome.原发性膀胱疼痛综合征相关 YouTube 视频评估
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 May;33(5):1251-1258. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05107-7. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
7
Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information?睾丸疼痛与YouTube™:上传的视频是获取信息的可靠来源吗?
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Mar;35(2):140-146. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00536-w. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
8
Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok.YouTube 和 TikTok 上治疗勃起功能障碍视频的横断面和对比分析。
Andrologia. 2022 Jun;54(5):e14392. doi: 10.1111/and.14392. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
9
Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust.透明地沟通 COVID-19 疫苗的负面特征会降低其接受度,但会增加信任。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 20;118(29). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024597118. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Breast Implant Illness (BII): Real Syndrome or a Social Media Phenomenon? A Narrative Review of the Literature.乳房植入病(BII):真实综合征还是社交媒体现象?文献综述的叙述性评价。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Feb;46(1):43-57. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02428-8. Epub 2021 Jul 6.